使用形成性评价来适应工作环境内部和之间的共同创造过程：一项健康级联研究

IF 3.9 3区医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH

Public Health Pub Date : 2025-07-10 DOI:10.1016/j.puhe.2025.105853

Mira Vogelsang , Lauren McCaffrey , Gemma C. Ryde , Maïté Verloigne , Lea Delfmann , Philippa M. Dall

{"title":"使用形成性评价来适应工作环境内部和之间的共同创造过程：一项健康级联研究","authors":"Mira Vogelsang , Lauren McCaffrey , Gemma C. Ryde , Maïté Verloigne , Lea Delfmann , Philippa M. Dall","doi":"10.1016/j.puhe.2025.105853","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Co-creation offers a promising approach to developing tailored health promotion interventions, but it requires adaptable processes responsive to contextual needs. Formative evaluation supports this adaptability through continuous reflection and informed adaptations. This study examines adaptations through formative evaluation in co-creation processes within and between different workplace contexts to advance the evaluation, transferability, and public health impact of co-creation.</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>A qualitative study examining adaptations to co-creation processes through thematic analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A co-creation process to develop a context-specific solution to reduce workplace sedentary behaviour was implemented in three small-to-medium-sized enterprises (6–8 sessions per company). Data from a pilot session, project meetings, co-creator feedback, and facilitator reflections were systematically linked to the resulting adaptations they informed. Reasons for adaptations were derived through thematic analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Adaptations occurred at two stages: planned adaptations, made before implementing the co-creation process, based on pilot data and project meeting logs, and responsive adaptations, made during implementation, informed by co-creator evaluations and facilitator reflections. Three main reasons for adaptations emerged: tailoring to context, enhancing process effectiveness, and fostering engagement.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Formative evaluation is crucial in evaluating co-creation processes. It ensures that these processes remain relevant, effective, and engaging, with skilled facilitators and end-user input being key. Replicating co-creation processes in new contexts requires the documentation of previous adaptations to identify core elements while allowing flexibility. These insights support the design of adaptable, evidence-based co-creation processes and help advance their evaluation and implementation in diverse contexts to develop effective and tailored solutions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49651,"journal":{"name":"Public Health","volume":"247 ","pages":"Article 105853"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using formative evaluation to adapt a co-creation process within and between workplace contexts: A Health CASCADE study\",\"authors\":\"Mira Vogelsang , Lauren McCaffrey , Gemma C. Ryde , Maïté Verloigne , Lea Delfmann , Philippa M. Dall\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.puhe.2025.105853\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Co-creation offers a promising approach to developing tailored health promotion interventions, but it requires adaptable processes responsive to contextual needs. Formative evaluation supports this adaptability through continuous reflection and informed adaptations. This study examines adaptations through formative evaluation in co-creation processes within and between different workplace contexts to advance the evaluation, transferability, and public health impact of co-creation.</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>A qualitative study examining adaptations to co-creation processes through thematic analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A co-creation process to develop a context-specific solution to reduce workplace sedentary behaviour was implemented in three small-to-medium-sized enterprises (6–8 sessions per company). Data from a pilot session, project meetings, co-creator feedback, and facilitator reflections were systematically linked to the resulting adaptations they informed. Reasons for adaptations were derived through thematic analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Adaptations occurred at two stages: planned adaptations, made before implementing the co-creation process, based on pilot data and project meeting logs, and responsive adaptations, made during implementation, informed by co-creator evaluations and facilitator reflections. Three main reasons for adaptations emerged: tailoring to context, enhancing process effectiveness, and fostering engagement.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Formative evaluation is crucial in evaluating co-creation processes. It ensures that these processes remain relevant, effective, and engaging, with skilled facilitators and end-user input being key. Replicating co-creation processes in new contexts requires the documentation of previous adaptations to identify core elements while allowing flexibility. These insights support the design of adaptable, evidence-based co-creation processes and help advance their evaluation and implementation in diverse contexts to develop effective and tailored solutions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49651,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Public Health\",\"volume\":\"247 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105853\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0033350625002999\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0033350625002999","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

共同创造为制定量身定制的健康促进干预措施提供了一种有希望的方法，但它需要适应环境需求的适应性过程。形成性评价通过持续的反思和知情的适应来支持这种适应性。本研究通过对不同工作场所环境中共同创造过程的形成性评估来考察适应性，以推进共同创造的评估、可转移性和公共卫生影响。研究设计一项定性研究，通过主题分析考察对共同创造过程的适应。方法在三家中小型企业（每家公司6-8次）实施了一项共同创造流程，以开发针对具体情况的解决方案，以减少工作场所久坐行为。来自试点会议、项目会议、共同创建者反馈和推动者反思的数据被系统地与他们所告知的最终调整联系起来。通过主题分析得出了改编的原因。调整分两个阶段进行：计划调整，在实施共同创造过程之前进行，基于试点数据和项目会议日志；响应调整，在实施过程中进行，根据共同创造者的评估和推动者的反思。进行调整的三个主要原因出现了：根据环境进行调整、提高过程效率和促进参与。结论形成性评价是评价共同创造过程的关键。它确保这些过程保持相关性、有效性和参与性，熟练的促进者和最终用户的输入是关键。在新的上下文中复制共同创建过程需要记录以前的调整，以便在允许灵活性的同时识别核心元素。这些见解支持设计适应性强、以证据为基础的共同创造流程，并有助于推进其在不同背景下的评估和实施，以制定有效和量身定制的解决方案。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Using formative evaluation to adapt a co-creation process within and between workplace contexts: A Health CASCADE study

Objectives

Co-creation offers a promising approach to developing tailored health promotion interventions, but it requires adaptable processes responsive to contextual needs. Formative evaluation supports this adaptability through continuous reflection and informed adaptations. This study examines adaptations through formative evaluation in co-creation processes within and between different workplace contexts to advance the evaluation, transferability, and public health impact of co-creation.

Study design

A qualitative study examining adaptations to co-creation processes through thematic analysis.

Methods

A co-creation process to develop a context-specific solution to reduce workplace sedentary behaviour was implemented in three small-to-medium-sized enterprises (6–8 sessions per company). Data from a pilot session, project meetings, co-creator feedback, and facilitator reflections were systematically linked to the resulting adaptations they informed. Reasons for adaptations were derived through thematic analysis.

Results

Adaptations occurred at two stages: planned adaptations, made before implementing the co-creation process, based on pilot data and project meeting logs, and responsive adaptations, made during implementation, informed by co-creator evaluations and facilitator reflections. Three main reasons for adaptations emerged: tailoring to context, enhancing process effectiveness, and fostering engagement.

Conclusion

Formative evaluation is crucial in evaluating co-creation processes. It ensures that these processes remain relevant, effective, and engaging, with skilled facilitators and end-user input being key. Replicating co-creation processes in new contexts requires the documentation of previous adaptations to identify core elements while allowing flexibility. These insights support the design of adaptable, evidence-based co-creation processes and help advance their evaluation and implementation in diverse contexts to develop effective and tailored solutions.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生

CiteScore

7.60

自引率

0.00%

发文量

280

审稿时长

37 days

期刊介绍： Public Health is an international, multidisciplinary peer-reviewed journal. It publishes original papers, reviews and short reports on all aspects of the science, philosophy, and practice of public health.