Ulrica Lennborn , Anna Johansson , Erik Lindgren , Elisabet I. Nielsen , Håkan Sandler , Robert Kronstrand , Johan Ahlner , Fredrik C. Kugelberg , Sten Rubertsson
{"title":"重症监护患者死前与死后镇痛、镇静药物血药浓度的比较","authors":"Ulrica Lennborn , Anna Johansson , Erik Lindgren , Elisabet I. Nielsen , Håkan Sandler , Robert Kronstrand , Johan Ahlner , Fredrik C. Kugelberg , Sten Rubertsson","doi":"10.1016/j.forsciint.2025.112551","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) often receive analgesic and sedative drugs. There is limited knowledge about the resulting drug concentrations in blood in the critically ill patient, and how these concentrations change after death. In this single-centre prospective study of deceased patients from a general ICU, the aim was to describe blood concentrations and post-mortem redistribution for ten common analgesic and sedative drugs.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We included 46 patients who died during intensive care. Blood samples were collected pre-mortem (before death), peri-mortem (within one hour after death) and post-mortem (through aortic arch sampling at the morgue or during clinical or forensic autopsy). Samples were analysed for clonidine, dexmedetomidine, fentanyl, ketamine, ketobemidone, morphine, midazolam, paracetamol, propofol and thiopental.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Post-mortem redistribution was significant for fentanyl, with a mean concentration increase from 3.1 ng/g to 5.2 ng/g (p = 0.002). There was no correlation between neither cumulative fentanyl dose nor post-mortem interval and post-mortem concentration changes. For the other drugs, the changes during the post-mortem interval were not significant. Median peri-mortem concentrations were 2.3–9 times higher than observed concentrations in a larger cohort of living ICU patients.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In conclusion, of the investigated drugs, only fentanyl showed a predominant positive post-mortem redistribution, whereas for the other drugs, post-mortem changes were unpredictable. We also conclude that concentrations from the living may not be comparable to those obtained even shortly after death. These concentration differences, as well as the observed post-mortem changes, can influence toxicological interpretation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12341,"journal":{"name":"Forensic science international","volume":"375 ","pages":"Article 112551"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of pre-mortem and post-mortem blood concentrations of analgesic and sedative drugs in intensive care patients\",\"authors\":\"Ulrica Lennborn , Anna Johansson , Erik Lindgren , Elisabet I. Nielsen , Håkan Sandler , Robert Kronstrand , Johan Ahlner , Fredrik C. Kugelberg , Sten Rubertsson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.forsciint.2025.112551\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) often receive analgesic and sedative drugs. There is limited knowledge about the resulting drug concentrations in blood in the critically ill patient, and how these concentrations change after death. In this single-centre prospective study of deceased patients from a general ICU, the aim was to describe blood concentrations and post-mortem redistribution for ten common analgesic and sedative drugs.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We included 46 patients who died during intensive care. Blood samples were collected pre-mortem (before death), peri-mortem (within one hour after death) and post-mortem (through aortic arch sampling at the morgue or during clinical or forensic autopsy). Samples were analysed for clonidine, dexmedetomidine, fentanyl, ketamine, ketobemidone, morphine, midazolam, paracetamol, propofol and thiopental.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Post-mortem redistribution was significant for fentanyl, with a mean concentration increase from 3.1 ng/g to 5.2 ng/g (p = 0.002). There was no correlation between neither cumulative fentanyl dose nor post-mortem interval and post-mortem concentration changes. For the other drugs, the changes during the post-mortem interval were not significant. Median peri-mortem concentrations were 2.3–9 times higher than observed concentrations in a larger cohort of living ICU patients.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In conclusion, of the investigated drugs, only fentanyl showed a predominant positive post-mortem redistribution, whereas for the other drugs, post-mortem changes were unpredictable. We also conclude that concentrations from the living may not be comparable to those obtained even shortly after death. These concentration differences, as well as the observed post-mortem changes, can influence toxicological interpretation.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12341,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Forensic science international\",\"volume\":\"375 \",\"pages\":\"Article 112551\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Forensic science international\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0379073825001896\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, LEGAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forensic science international","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0379073825001896","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of pre-mortem and post-mortem blood concentrations of analgesic and sedative drugs in intensive care patients
Background
Patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) often receive analgesic and sedative drugs. There is limited knowledge about the resulting drug concentrations in blood in the critically ill patient, and how these concentrations change after death. In this single-centre prospective study of deceased patients from a general ICU, the aim was to describe blood concentrations and post-mortem redistribution for ten common analgesic and sedative drugs.
Methods
We included 46 patients who died during intensive care. Blood samples were collected pre-mortem (before death), peri-mortem (within one hour after death) and post-mortem (through aortic arch sampling at the morgue or during clinical or forensic autopsy). Samples were analysed for clonidine, dexmedetomidine, fentanyl, ketamine, ketobemidone, morphine, midazolam, paracetamol, propofol and thiopental.
Results
Post-mortem redistribution was significant for fentanyl, with a mean concentration increase from 3.1 ng/g to 5.2 ng/g (p = 0.002). There was no correlation between neither cumulative fentanyl dose nor post-mortem interval and post-mortem concentration changes. For the other drugs, the changes during the post-mortem interval were not significant. Median peri-mortem concentrations were 2.3–9 times higher than observed concentrations in a larger cohort of living ICU patients.
Conclusion
In conclusion, of the investigated drugs, only fentanyl showed a predominant positive post-mortem redistribution, whereas for the other drugs, post-mortem changes were unpredictable. We also conclude that concentrations from the living may not be comparable to those obtained even shortly after death. These concentration differences, as well as the observed post-mortem changes, can influence toxicological interpretation.
期刊介绍:
Forensic Science International is the flagship journal in the prestigious Forensic Science International family, publishing the most innovative, cutting-edge, and influential contributions across the forensic sciences. Fields include: forensic pathology and histochemistry, chemistry, biochemistry and toxicology, biology, serology, odontology, psychiatry, anthropology, digital forensics, the physical sciences, firearms, and document examination, as well as investigations of value to public health in its broadest sense, and the important marginal area where science and medicine interact with the law.
The journal publishes:
Case Reports
Commentaries
Letters to the Editor
Original Research Papers (Regular Papers)
Rapid Communications
Review Articles
Technical Notes.