采掘后的治理和矿业遗产的形成:法国和巴西采石场再认证的制度途径

IF 3.6 2区 社会学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Úrsula de Azevedo Ruchkys (Associate Professor) , Eugênia Viana Cerqueira , Luciano José Alvarenga , Dionisio Tadeu de Azevedo
{"title":"采掘后的治理和矿业遗产的形成:法国和巴西采石场再认证的制度途径","authors":"Úrsula de Azevedo Ruchkys (Associate Professor) ,&nbsp;Eugênia Viana Cerqueira ,&nbsp;Luciano José Alvarenga ,&nbsp;Dionisio Tadeu de Azevedo","doi":"10.1016/j.exis.2025.101731","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This article analyzes contrasting forms of meaning-making and valuation of mined landscapes, employing a comparative approach between the Beaujolais Geopark in France and former quarries in Ouro Preto, Brazil. The investigation draws on the four landscape concepts proposed by Bloxam (2009) — socially constructed, contact, historically associated, and dynamic — in articulation with Evolutionary Governance Theory (EGT). The findings indicate that, in both contexts, mining functioned as a structuring force for territorial identities, but followed distinct trajectories. While Beaujolais repurposed former quarries into cultural and educational facilities through a coordinated territorial project, the quarries of Ouro Preto — associated with the extraction of quartzite, soapstone, and dolomitic limestone — remain on the margins of heritage policies. The results underscore the need for inclusive interpretive strategies and heritage-oriented governance models in regions shaped by extractive legacies and regulatory gaps. By mapping alternative institutional pathways, the article contributes to contemporary debates on post-mining futures, cultural reconversion, and the role of communities in steering territorial transitions. The analysis reveals that the valorization of these landscapes depends on factors such as symbolic continuity, institutional frameworks, and community engagement. The study contributes to expanding the understanding of geoheritage by demonstrating how post-mining contexts can become drivers of territorial reinterpretation and the construction of sustainable futures.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47848,"journal":{"name":"Extractive Industries and Society-An International Journal","volume":"24 ","pages":"Article 101731"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Post-extraction governance and the making of mining heritage: Institutional pathways for quarry requalification in France and Brazil\",\"authors\":\"Úrsula de Azevedo Ruchkys (Associate Professor) ,&nbsp;Eugênia Viana Cerqueira ,&nbsp;Luciano José Alvarenga ,&nbsp;Dionisio Tadeu de Azevedo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.exis.2025.101731\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This article analyzes contrasting forms of meaning-making and valuation of mined landscapes, employing a comparative approach between the Beaujolais Geopark in France and former quarries in Ouro Preto, Brazil. The investigation draws on the four landscape concepts proposed by Bloxam (2009) — socially constructed, contact, historically associated, and dynamic — in articulation with Evolutionary Governance Theory (EGT). The findings indicate that, in both contexts, mining functioned as a structuring force for territorial identities, but followed distinct trajectories. While Beaujolais repurposed former quarries into cultural and educational facilities through a coordinated territorial project, the quarries of Ouro Preto — associated with the extraction of quartzite, soapstone, and dolomitic limestone — remain on the margins of heritage policies. The results underscore the need for inclusive interpretive strategies and heritage-oriented governance models in regions shaped by extractive legacies and regulatory gaps. By mapping alternative institutional pathways, the article contributes to contemporary debates on post-mining futures, cultural reconversion, and the role of communities in steering territorial transitions. The analysis reveals that the valorization of these landscapes depends on factors such as symbolic continuity, institutional frameworks, and community engagement. The study contributes to expanding the understanding of geoheritage by demonstrating how post-mining contexts can become drivers of territorial reinterpretation and the construction of sustainable futures.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47848,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Extractive Industries and Society-An International Journal\",\"volume\":\"24 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101731\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Extractive Industries and Society-An International Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214790X25001200\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Extractive Industries and Society-An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214790X25001200","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文通过对法国博若莱地质公园和巴西欧鲁普雷图前采石场的比较,分析了开采景观意义形成和价值评估的不同形式。该研究借鉴了Bloxam(2009)提出的四个景观概念——社会构建、接触、历史关联和动态——并结合了进化治理理论(EGT)。研究结果表明,在这两种情况下,采矿都是领土特性的结构力量,但遵循不同的轨迹。博若莱通过一个协调的领土项目,将以前的采石场改造成文化和教育设施,而欧鲁普雷托的采石场——与石英岩、皂石和白云石的开采有关——仍然处于遗产政策的边缘。研究结果强调,在受采掘遗产和监管缺口影响的地区,需要制定包容性的解释战略和以遗产为导向的治理模式。通过绘制替代性制度路径,本文有助于当代关于采矿后未来、文化再转换以及社区在指导领土过渡中的作用的辩论。分析表明,这些景观的价值取决于象征性的连续性、制度框架和社区参与等因素。该研究通过展示采矿后的背景如何成为领土重新解释和可持续未来建设的驱动因素,有助于扩大对地质遗产的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Post-extraction governance and the making of mining heritage: Institutional pathways for quarry requalification in France and Brazil
This article analyzes contrasting forms of meaning-making and valuation of mined landscapes, employing a comparative approach between the Beaujolais Geopark in France and former quarries in Ouro Preto, Brazil. The investigation draws on the four landscape concepts proposed by Bloxam (2009) — socially constructed, contact, historically associated, and dynamic — in articulation with Evolutionary Governance Theory (EGT). The findings indicate that, in both contexts, mining functioned as a structuring force for territorial identities, but followed distinct trajectories. While Beaujolais repurposed former quarries into cultural and educational facilities through a coordinated territorial project, the quarries of Ouro Preto — associated with the extraction of quartzite, soapstone, and dolomitic limestone — remain on the margins of heritage policies. The results underscore the need for inclusive interpretive strategies and heritage-oriented governance models in regions shaped by extractive legacies and regulatory gaps. By mapping alternative institutional pathways, the article contributes to contemporary debates on post-mining futures, cultural reconversion, and the role of communities in steering territorial transitions. The analysis reveals that the valorization of these landscapes depends on factors such as symbolic continuity, institutional frameworks, and community engagement. The study contributes to expanding the understanding of geoheritage by demonstrating how post-mining contexts can become drivers of territorial reinterpretation and the construction of sustainable futures.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
19.40%
发文量
135
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信