网约车对传统出行方式的影响:基于中国网约车监管政策有效性的实证研究

IF 6.8 1区 工程技术 Q1 ECONOMICS
Zhuolun Wang, Yan Lin, Biao Xue
{"title":"网约车对传统出行方式的影响:基于中国网约车监管政策有效性的实证研究","authors":"Zhuolun Wang,&nbsp;Yan Lin,&nbsp;Biao Xue","doi":"10.1016/j.tra.2025.104594","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Ride-hailing regulatory policy first clarifies the legal status of ride-hailing services and establishes an access framework to standardize their operations. Subsequently, local governments implement differentiated enforcement rules based on this framework, laying a solid foundation for the healthy development of China’s ride-hailing industry. However, it is necessary to further evaluate whether this policy changes the impact of ride-hailing services on traditional travel modes. This study focuses on 72 Chinese cities (40 of which introduced ride-hailing and 45 of which implemented policy) between 2010 and 2017, selecting bus ridership and private car ownership as measures of traditional travel modes, using difference-in-differences (DID) and difference-in-difference-in-differences (DDD) methods, and exploring the impacts of ride-hailing services on traditional travel modes before and after regulatory policy. The results reveal that (1) before the regulatory policy implementation, the entry of ride-hailing services significantly decreases bus ridership but has no significant negative impact on private car ownership; (2) the regulatory policy implementation significantly mitigates the negative impact of ride-hailing services on bus ridership and private car ownership; and (3) the loose policy is significantly effective in alleviating the negative impacts of ride-hailing services on bus ridership and private car ownership. The research results have important implications for the Chinese government in regulating emerging transportation modes in urban areas.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49421,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice","volume":"199 ","pages":"Article 104594"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of ride-hailing services on traditional travel modes: an empirical study based on the validity of Chinese ride-hailing regulatory policy\",\"authors\":\"Zhuolun Wang,&nbsp;Yan Lin,&nbsp;Biao Xue\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tra.2025.104594\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Ride-hailing regulatory policy first clarifies the legal status of ride-hailing services and establishes an access framework to standardize their operations. Subsequently, local governments implement differentiated enforcement rules based on this framework, laying a solid foundation for the healthy development of China’s ride-hailing industry. However, it is necessary to further evaluate whether this policy changes the impact of ride-hailing services on traditional travel modes. This study focuses on 72 Chinese cities (40 of which introduced ride-hailing and 45 of which implemented policy) between 2010 and 2017, selecting bus ridership and private car ownership as measures of traditional travel modes, using difference-in-differences (DID) and difference-in-difference-in-differences (DDD) methods, and exploring the impacts of ride-hailing services on traditional travel modes before and after regulatory policy. The results reveal that (1) before the regulatory policy implementation, the entry of ride-hailing services significantly decreases bus ridership but has no significant negative impact on private car ownership; (2) the regulatory policy implementation significantly mitigates the negative impact of ride-hailing services on bus ridership and private car ownership; and (3) the loose policy is significantly effective in alleviating the negative impacts of ride-hailing services on bus ridership and private car ownership. The research results have important implications for the Chinese government in regulating emerging transportation modes in urban areas.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49421,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice\",\"volume\":\"199 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104594\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856425002228\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856425002228","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

网约车监管政策首先明确了网约车服务的法律地位,建立准入框架,规范其运营。随后,各地政府在此框架下实施差异化的执行细则,为中国网约车行业的健康发展奠定了坚实的基础。然而,有必要进一步评估这一政策是否会改变网约车服务对传统出行方式的影响。本研究以2010 - 2017年中国72个城市(其中40个城市引入网约车,45个城市实施网约车政策)为研究对象,选取公交客流量和私家车保有量作为衡量传统出行方式的指标,采用差分中的差分(DID)和差分中的差分(DDD)方法,探讨网约车服务在政策调控前后对传统出行方式的影响。结果表明:(1)调控政策实施前,网约车的进入显著降低了公交客流量,但对私家车保有量没有显著的负面影响;(2)监管政策的实施显著缓解了网约车服务对公交客流量和私家车保有量的负面影响;③宽松政策显著缓解了网约车服务对公交客流量和私家车保有量的负面影响。研究结果对中国政府调控城市新兴交通方式具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The impact of ride-hailing services on traditional travel modes: an empirical study based on the validity of Chinese ride-hailing regulatory policy
Ride-hailing regulatory policy first clarifies the legal status of ride-hailing services and establishes an access framework to standardize their operations. Subsequently, local governments implement differentiated enforcement rules based on this framework, laying a solid foundation for the healthy development of China’s ride-hailing industry. However, it is necessary to further evaluate whether this policy changes the impact of ride-hailing services on traditional travel modes. This study focuses on 72 Chinese cities (40 of which introduced ride-hailing and 45 of which implemented policy) between 2010 and 2017, selecting bus ridership and private car ownership as measures of traditional travel modes, using difference-in-differences (DID) and difference-in-difference-in-differences (DDD) methods, and exploring the impacts of ride-hailing services on traditional travel modes before and after regulatory policy. The results reveal that (1) before the regulatory policy implementation, the entry of ride-hailing services significantly decreases bus ridership but has no significant negative impact on private car ownership; (2) the regulatory policy implementation significantly mitigates the negative impact of ride-hailing services on bus ridership and private car ownership; and (3) the loose policy is significantly effective in alleviating the negative impacts of ride-hailing services on bus ridership and private car ownership. The research results have important implications for the Chinese government in regulating emerging transportation modes in urban areas.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.20
自引率
7.80%
发文量
257
审稿时长
9.8 months
期刊介绍: Transportation Research: Part A contains papers of general interest in all passenger and freight transportation modes: policy analysis, formulation and evaluation; planning; interaction with the political, socioeconomic and physical environment; design, management and evaluation of transportation systems. Topics are approached from any discipline or perspective: economics, engineering, sociology, psychology, etc. Case studies, survey and expository papers are included, as are articles which contribute to unification of the field, or to an understanding of the comparative aspects of different systems. Papers which assess the scope for technological innovation within a social or political framework are also published. The journal is international, and places equal emphasis on the problems of industrialized and non-industrialized regions. Part A''s aims and scope are complementary to Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Part C: Emerging Technologies and Part D: Transport and Environment. Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review. Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. The complete set forms the most cohesive and comprehensive reference of current research in transportation science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信