肽修饰脂质纳米颗粒的制备方法

IF 10.5 1区 医学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Katelyn Miyasaki, Sangwoo Han, Olivia Carton, Rebecca M. Kandell, Jonathan Gunn, Ester J. Kwon
{"title":"肽修饰脂质纳米颗粒的制备方法","authors":"Katelyn Miyasaki, Sangwoo Han, Olivia Carton, Rebecca M. Kandell, Jonathan Gunn, Ester J. Kwon","doi":"10.1016/j.jconrel.2025.114030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) are a promising non-viral gene carrier, but one significant unmet challenge is cell-specific delivery in extrahepatic organs. Peptides are one class of targeting ligand that have been used to target nanoparticles, including LNPs. Herein, we compared two formulation approaches that use the polyethylene glycol (PEG)-lipid to display targeting peptides: (1) post-conjugation targeted (PCT), in which LNPs were formulated with PEG-lipid with chemical handles and subsequently modified with peptides, and (2) in-line targeted (ILT), in which peptide-PEG-lipid conjugates were directly used in LNP formulation<em>.</em> We observed that PCT and ILT LNPs had similar physicochemical properties, but ILT LNPs aggregated when formulated with a large peptide. Using cyclic RGD as a model ligand, we observed that while binding and uptake of LNPs in cultured cells were similar between approaches, PCT LNPs led to higher activity. Systemic administration revealed that LNPs formulated with both methods led to shifts in organ biodistribution compared to untargeted LNPs, but PCT resulted in higher transfection compared to ILT. Finally, analysis of cell tropism showed that the transfection activity of cRGD LNPs was shifted towards endothelial cells in multiple organs. We conclude that while PCT LNPs required more processing steps over the ILT LNPs, they led to superior formulations that led to active peptide targeting.","PeriodicalId":15450,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Controlled Release","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Formulation methods for peptide-modified lipid nanoparticles\",\"authors\":\"Katelyn Miyasaki, Sangwoo Han, Olivia Carton, Rebecca M. Kandell, Jonathan Gunn, Ester J. Kwon\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jconrel.2025.114030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) are a promising non-viral gene carrier, but one significant unmet challenge is cell-specific delivery in extrahepatic organs. Peptides are one class of targeting ligand that have been used to target nanoparticles, including LNPs. Herein, we compared two formulation approaches that use the polyethylene glycol (PEG)-lipid to display targeting peptides: (1) post-conjugation targeted (PCT), in which LNPs were formulated with PEG-lipid with chemical handles and subsequently modified with peptides, and (2) in-line targeted (ILT), in which peptide-PEG-lipid conjugates were directly used in LNP formulation<em>.</em> We observed that PCT and ILT LNPs had similar physicochemical properties, but ILT LNPs aggregated when formulated with a large peptide. Using cyclic RGD as a model ligand, we observed that while binding and uptake of LNPs in cultured cells were similar between approaches, PCT LNPs led to higher activity. Systemic administration revealed that LNPs formulated with both methods led to shifts in organ biodistribution compared to untargeted LNPs, but PCT resulted in higher transfection compared to ILT. Finally, analysis of cell tropism showed that the transfection activity of cRGD LNPs was shifted towards endothelial cells in multiple organs. We conclude that while PCT LNPs required more processing steps over the ILT LNPs, they led to superior formulations that led to active peptide targeting.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15450,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Controlled Release\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Controlled Release\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2025.114030\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Controlled Release","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2025.114030","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

脂质纳米颗粒(LNPs)是一种很有前途的非病毒基因载体,但在肝外器官的细胞特异性递送是一个重要的尚未解决的挑战。肽是一类靶向配体,已被用于靶向纳米颗粒,包括LNPs。在此,我们比较了两种使用聚乙二醇(PEG)-脂质来展示靶向肽的配方方法:(1)后偶联靶向(PCT),其中LNPs与聚乙二醇-脂质通过化学处理配制,然后用肽修饰;(2)内联靶向(ILT),其中肽-PEG-脂质偶联物直接用于LNP配方。我们观察到PCT和ILT LNPs具有相似的物理化学性质,但ILT LNPs在与一个大肽组成时聚集。使用环状RGD作为模型配体,我们观察到尽管两种方法在培养细胞中LNPs的结合和摄取相似,但PCT LNPs具有更高的活性。系统给药显示,与非靶向LNPs相比,用两种方法配制的LNPs导致器官生物分布的改变,但与ILT相比,PCT导致更高的转染。最后,细胞向性分析表明,cRGD LNPs的转染活性向多器官内皮细胞转移。我们得出结论,尽管PCT LNPs比ILT LNPs需要更多的加工步骤,但它们导致了更优越的配方,从而导致了活性肽靶向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Formulation methods for peptide-modified lipid nanoparticles

Formulation methods for peptide-modified lipid nanoparticles
Lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) are a promising non-viral gene carrier, but one significant unmet challenge is cell-specific delivery in extrahepatic organs. Peptides are one class of targeting ligand that have been used to target nanoparticles, including LNPs. Herein, we compared two formulation approaches that use the polyethylene glycol (PEG)-lipid to display targeting peptides: (1) post-conjugation targeted (PCT), in which LNPs were formulated with PEG-lipid with chemical handles and subsequently modified with peptides, and (2) in-line targeted (ILT), in which peptide-PEG-lipid conjugates were directly used in LNP formulation. We observed that PCT and ILT LNPs had similar physicochemical properties, but ILT LNPs aggregated when formulated with a large peptide. Using cyclic RGD as a model ligand, we observed that while binding and uptake of LNPs in cultured cells were similar between approaches, PCT LNPs led to higher activity. Systemic administration revealed that LNPs formulated with both methods led to shifts in organ biodistribution compared to untargeted LNPs, but PCT resulted in higher transfection compared to ILT. Finally, analysis of cell tropism showed that the transfection activity of cRGD LNPs was shifted towards endothelial cells in multiple organs. We conclude that while PCT LNPs required more processing steps over the ILT LNPs, they led to superior formulations that led to active peptide targeting.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Controlled Release
Journal of Controlled Release 医学-化学综合
CiteScore
18.50
自引率
5.60%
发文量
700
审稿时长
39 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Controlled Release (JCR) proudly serves as the Official Journal of the Controlled Release Society and the Japan Society of Drug Delivery System. Dedicated to the broad field of delivery science and technology, JCR publishes high-quality research articles covering drug delivery systems and all facets of formulations. This includes the physicochemical and biological properties of drugs, design and characterization of dosage forms, release mechanisms, in vivo testing, and formulation research and development across pharmaceutical, diagnostic, agricultural, environmental, cosmetic, and food industries. Priority is given to manuscripts that contribute to the fundamental understanding of principles or demonstrate the advantages of novel technologies in terms of safety and efficacy over current clinical standards. JCR strives to be a leading platform for advancements in delivery science and technology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信