Katelyn Miyasaki, Sangwoo Han, Olivia Carton, Rebecca M. Kandell, Jonathan Gunn, Ester J. Kwon
{"title":"肽修饰脂质纳米颗粒的制备方法","authors":"Katelyn Miyasaki, Sangwoo Han, Olivia Carton, Rebecca M. Kandell, Jonathan Gunn, Ester J. Kwon","doi":"10.1016/j.jconrel.2025.114030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) are a promising non-viral gene carrier, but one significant unmet challenge is cell-specific delivery in extrahepatic organs. Peptides are one class of targeting ligand that have been used to target nanoparticles, including LNPs. Herein, we compared two formulation approaches that use the polyethylene glycol (PEG)-lipid to display targeting peptides: (1) post-conjugation targeted (PCT), in which LNPs were formulated with PEG-lipid with chemical handles and subsequently modified with peptides, and (2) in-line targeted (ILT), in which peptide-PEG-lipid conjugates were directly used in LNP formulation<em>.</em> We observed that PCT and ILT LNPs had similar physicochemical properties, but ILT LNPs aggregated when formulated with a large peptide. Using cyclic RGD as a model ligand, we observed that while binding and uptake of LNPs in cultured cells were similar between approaches, PCT LNPs led to higher activity. Systemic administration revealed that LNPs formulated with both methods led to shifts in organ biodistribution compared to untargeted LNPs, but PCT resulted in higher transfection compared to ILT. Finally, analysis of cell tropism showed that the transfection activity of cRGD LNPs was shifted towards endothelial cells in multiple organs. We conclude that while PCT LNPs required more processing steps over the ILT LNPs, they led to superior formulations that led to active peptide targeting.","PeriodicalId":15450,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Controlled Release","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Formulation methods for peptide-modified lipid nanoparticles\",\"authors\":\"Katelyn Miyasaki, Sangwoo Han, Olivia Carton, Rebecca M. Kandell, Jonathan Gunn, Ester J. Kwon\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jconrel.2025.114030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) are a promising non-viral gene carrier, but one significant unmet challenge is cell-specific delivery in extrahepatic organs. Peptides are one class of targeting ligand that have been used to target nanoparticles, including LNPs. Herein, we compared two formulation approaches that use the polyethylene glycol (PEG)-lipid to display targeting peptides: (1) post-conjugation targeted (PCT), in which LNPs were formulated with PEG-lipid with chemical handles and subsequently modified with peptides, and (2) in-line targeted (ILT), in which peptide-PEG-lipid conjugates were directly used in LNP formulation<em>.</em> We observed that PCT and ILT LNPs had similar physicochemical properties, but ILT LNPs aggregated when formulated with a large peptide. Using cyclic RGD as a model ligand, we observed that while binding and uptake of LNPs in cultured cells were similar between approaches, PCT LNPs led to higher activity. Systemic administration revealed that LNPs formulated with both methods led to shifts in organ biodistribution compared to untargeted LNPs, but PCT resulted in higher transfection compared to ILT. Finally, analysis of cell tropism showed that the transfection activity of cRGD LNPs was shifted towards endothelial cells in multiple organs. We conclude that while PCT LNPs required more processing steps over the ILT LNPs, they led to superior formulations that led to active peptide targeting.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15450,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Controlled Release\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Controlled Release\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2025.114030\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Controlled Release","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2025.114030","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Formulation methods for peptide-modified lipid nanoparticles
Lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) are a promising non-viral gene carrier, but one significant unmet challenge is cell-specific delivery in extrahepatic organs. Peptides are one class of targeting ligand that have been used to target nanoparticles, including LNPs. Herein, we compared two formulation approaches that use the polyethylene glycol (PEG)-lipid to display targeting peptides: (1) post-conjugation targeted (PCT), in which LNPs were formulated with PEG-lipid with chemical handles and subsequently modified with peptides, and (2) in-line targeted (ILT), in which peptide-PEG-lipid conjugates were directly used in LNP formulation. We observed that PCT and ILT LNPs had similar physicochemical properties, but ILT LNPs aggregated when formulated with a large peptide. Using cyclic RGD as a model ligand, we observed that while binding and uptake of LNPs in cultured cells were similar between approaches, PCT LNPs led to higher activity. Systemic administration revealed that LNPs formulated with both methods led to shifts in organ biodistribution compared to untargeted LNPs, but PCT resulted in higher transfection compared to ILT. Finally, analysis of cell tropism showed that the transfection activity of cRGD LNPs was shifted towards endothelial cells in multiple organs. We conclude that while PCT LNPs required more processing steps over the ILT LNPs, they led to superior formulations that led to active peptide targeting.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Controlled Release (JCR) proudly serves as the Official Journal of the Controlled Release Society and the Japan Society of Drug Delivery System.
Dedicated to the broad field of delivery science and technology, JCR publishes high-quality research articles covering drug delivery systems and all facets of formulations. This includes the physicochemical and biological properties of drugs, design and characterization of dosage forms, release mechanisms, in vivo testing, and formulation research and development across pharmaceutical, diagnostic, agricultural, environmental, cosmetic, and food industries.
Priority is given to manuscripts that contribute to the fundamental understanding of principles or demonstrate the advantages of novel technologies in terms of safety and efficacy over current clinical standards. JCR strives to be a leading platform for advancements in delivery science and technology.