原发性前交叉韧带撕裂的冠状排列模式:胫骨优势对内翻和外翻排列的影响。

Adam B Thompson,Luke V Tollefson,Nicholas I Kennedy,Evan P Shoemaker,Christopher M LaPrade,Robert F LaPrade
{"title":"原发性前交叉韧带撕裂的冠状排列模式:胫骨优势对内翻和外翻排列的影响。","authors":"Adam B Thompson,Luke V Tollefson,Nicholas I Kennedy,Evan P Shoemaker,Christopher M LaPrade,Robert F LaPrade","doi":"10.1177/03635465251354972","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nWhile the effect of increased posterior tibial slope on the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-deficient knee is increasingly recognized, the specific patterns of coronal alignment and their effects on concomitant knee abnormalities remain relatively underappreciated.\r\n\r\nPURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS\r\nThe purpose of this study was to evaluate overall coronal-plane alignment in patients with primary ACL tears, identifying individual mechanical femoral and tibial angles, and whether secondary concomitant injuries associated with ACL tears were related to overall or individual mechanical femoral and tibial alignment. Our null hypothesis was that there would be no differences in the tibial or femoral influence among the coronal alignment groups.\r\n\r\nSTUDY DESIGN\r\nCase series; Level of evidence, 4.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nThe preoperative coronal alignment of patients undergoing primary ACL reconstructions were assessed retrospectively between June 2019 and July 2024. Patients were categorized into neutral, varus, and valgus groups based on their long-limb coronal mechanical axis. Coronal measurements were obtained, including the mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA) and mechanical medial proximal tibial angle (mMPTA), to determine individual alignment of the femur and the tibia. The neutral mLDFA and mMPTA were defined by a range within 1 standard deviation from the mean mLDFA and mMPTA values of the neutral group. Varus and valgus alignment were assessed, including if the variation originated from the tibia, the femur, or both. Comparisons to posterior tibial slope, sex, and concomitant injuries were analyzed.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nThe study consisted of 250 patients (116 female). The mean mLDFA was 86.3° ± 1.7°, and the mean mMPTA was 87.3° ± 2.2°. The mean mechanical hip-knee-ankle angle and joint line convergence angle were 179.9° ± 2.9° and 1.3° ± 1.0°, respectively. On the basis of the mechanical axis, 113 patients were classified as having neutral alignment, 77 as having varus alignment, and 60 as having valgus alignment. The mMPTA was the primary cause of overall alignment in both the varus (54.5%) and valgus (65.0%) groups. Female patients had a significantly higher mMPTA than male patients (88.1° vs 86.7°, respectively), indicating less overall tibial varus alignment (P < .001), and there were significantly more female patients in the valgus group (P < .001). Concomitant meniscal, chondral, and ligament injuries displayed no significant associations between each coronal alignment group.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nThe present study found that overall varus and valgus alignment were influenced more often by the tibia, or the mMPTA, than by the femur, especially for valgus alignment. Additionally, female patients exhibited significantly more overall valgus alignment than male patients, with the tibia being the primary determinant of valgus alignment. Finally, coronal alignment did not influence concomitant meniscal, chondral, or ligament injuries.","PeriodicalId":517411,"journal":{"name":"The American Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":"63 1","pages":"3635465251354972"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Coronal Alignment Patterns in Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears: The Influence of Tibial Dominance on Both Varus and Valgus Alignment.\",\"authors\":\"Adam B Thompson,Luke V Tollefson,Nicholas I Kennedy,Evan P Shoemaker,Christopher M LaPrade,Robert F LaPrade\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/03635465251354972\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\r\\nWhile the effect of increased posterior tibial slope on the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-deficient knee is increasingly recognized, the specific patterns of coronal alignment and their effects on concomitant knee abnormalities remain relatively underappreciated.\\r\\n\\r\\nPURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS\\r\\nThe purpose of this study was to evaluate overall coronal-plane alignment in patients with primary ACL tears, identifying individual mechanical femoral and tibial angles, and whether secondary concomitant injuries associated with ACL tears were related to overall or individual mechanical femoral and tibial alignment. Our null hypothesis was that there would be no differences in the tibial or femoral influence among the coronal alignment groups.\\r\\n\\r\\nSTUDY DESIGN\\r\\nCase series; Level of evidence, 4.\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHODS\\r\\nThe preoperative coronal alignment of patients undergoing primary ACL reconstructions were assessed retrospectively between June 2019 and July 2024. Patients were categorized into neutral, varus, and valgus groups based on their long-limb coronal mechanical axis. Coronal measurements were obtained, including the mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA) and mechanical medial proximal tibial angle (mMPTA), to determine individual alignment of the femur and the tibia. The neutral mLDFA and mMPTA were defined by a range within 1 standard deviation from the mean mLDFA and mMPTA values of the neutral group. Varus and valgus alignment were assessed, including if the variation originated from the tibia, the femur, or both. Comparisons to posterior tibial slope, sex, and concomitant injuries were analyzed.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nThe study consisted of 250 patients (116 female). The mean mLDFA was 86.3° ± 1.7°, and the mean mMPTA was 87.3° ± 2.2°. The mean mechanical hip-knee-ankle angle and joint line convergence angle were 179.9° ± 2.9° and 1.3° ± 1.0°, respectively. On the basis of the mechanical axis, 113 patients were classified as having neutral alignment, 77 as having varus alignment, and 60 as having valgus alignment. The mMPTA was the primary cause of overall alignment in both the varus (54.5%) and valgus (65.0%) groups. Female patients had a significantly higher mMPTA than male patients (88.1° vs 86.7°, respectively), indicating less overall tibial varus alignment (P < .001), and there were significantly more female patients in the valgus group (P < .001). Concomitant meniscal, chondral, and ligament injuries displayed no significant associations between each coronal alignment group.\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSION\\r\\nThe present study found that overall varus and valgus alignment were influenced more often by the tibia, or the mMPTA, than by the femur, especially for valgus alignment. Additionally, female patients exhibited significantly more overall valgus alignment than male patients, with the tibia being the primary determinant of valgus alignment. Finally, coronal alignment did not influence concomitant meniscal, chondral, or ligament injuries.\",\"PeriodicalId\":517411,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The American Journal of Sports Medicine\",\"volume\":\"63 1\",\"pages\":\"3635465251354972\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The American Journal of Sports Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465251354972\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465251354972","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:虽然胫骨后斜度增加对前交叉韧带(ACL)缺陷膝关节的影响越来越被认识到,但冠状位对齐的特定模式及其对伴随膝关节异常的影响仍然相对不被重视。目的/假设本研究的目的是评估原发性前交叉韧带撕裂患者的整体冠状面对齐,确定单个机械股骨和胫骨角度,以及与前交叉韧带撕裂相关的继发性伴随损伤是否与整体或单个机械股骨和胫骨对齐有关。我们的原假设是冠状排列组对胫骨或股骨的影响没有差异。研究设计案例系列;证据等级,4级。方法回顾性评估2019年6月至2024年7月行原发性ACL重建患者的术前冠状位对齐情况。根据患者的长肢冠状机械轴分为中性、内翻和外翻组。获得冠状面测量,包括机械股骨外侧远端角(mLDFA)和机械胫骨内侧近端角(mMPTA),以确定股骨和胫骨的个别对齐。中性mLDFA和mMPTA的定义范围为与中性组mLDFA和mMPTA平均值相差1个标准差。评估内翻和外翻对齐,包括变异是否起源于胫骨、股骨或两者。比较胫骨后坡、性别和伴发损伤。结果共纳入250例患者,其中女性116例。平均mLDFA为86.3°±1.7°,平均mMPTA为87.3°±2.2°。平均机械髋关节-膝关节-踝关节角为179.9°±2.9°,关节线收敛角为1.3°±1.0°。根据机械轴,113例患者为中性对准,77例为内翻对准,60例为外翻对准。在内翻组(54.5%)和外翻组(65.0%)中,mMPTA是导致整体对准的主要原因。女性患者的mMPTA明显高于男性患者(分别为88.1°和86.7°),表明胫骨内翻整体对准程度较低(P < 0.001),外翻组女性患者明显多于男性患者(P < 0.001)。同时发生的半月板、软骨和韧带损伤在冠状动脉排列组之间没有明显的相关性。结论本研究发现,胫骨或mMPTA比股骨更容易影响整体内翻和外翻对准,尤其是外翻对准。此外,女性患者比男性患者表现出更多的整体外翻对齐,胫骨是外翻对齐的主要决定因素。最后,冠状面对准不影响伴随的半月板、软骨或韧带损伤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Coronal Alignment Patterns in Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears: The Influence of Tibial Dominance on Both Varus and Valgus Alignment.
BACKGROUND While the effect of increased posterior tibial slope on the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-deficient knee is increasingly recognized, the specific patterns of coronal alignment and their effects on concomitant knee abnormalities remain relatively underappreciated. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS The purpose of this study was to evaluate overall coronal-plane alignment in patients with primary ACL tears, identifying individual mechanical femoral and tibial angles, and whether secondary concomitant injuries associated with ACL tears were related to overall or individual mechanical femoral and tibial alignment. Our null hypothesis was that there would be no differences in the tibial or femoral influence among the coronal alignment groups. STUDY DESIGN Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS The preoperative coronal alignment of patients undergoing primary ACL reconstructions were assessed retrospectively between June 2019 and July 2024. Patients were categorized into neutral, varus, and valgus groups based on their long-limb coronal mechanical axis. Coronal measurements were obtained, including the mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA) and mechanical medial proximal tibial angle (mMPTA), to determine individual alignment of the femur and the tibia. The neutral mLDFA and mMPTA were defined by a range within 1 standard deviation from the mean mLDFA and mMPTA values of the neutral group. Varus and valgus alignment were assessed, including if the variation originated from the tibia, the femur, or both. Comparisons to posterior tibial slope, sex, and concomitant injuries were analyzed. RESULTS The study consisted of 250 patients (116 female). The mean mLDFA was 86.3° ± 1.7°, and the mean mMPTA was 87.3° ± 2.2°. The mean mechanical hip-knee-ankle angle and joint line convergence angle were 179.9° ± 2.9° and 1.3° ± 1.0°, respectively. On the basis of the mechanical axis, 113 patients were classified as having neutral alignment, 77 as having varus alignment, and 60 as having valgus alignment. The mMPTA was the primary cause of overall alignment in both the varus (54.5%) and valgus (65.0%) groups. Female patients had a significantly higher mMPTA than male patients (88.1° vs 86.7°, respectively), indicating less overall tibial varus alignment (P < .001), and there were significantly more female patients in the valgus group (P < .001). Concomitant meniscal, chondral, and ligament injuries displayed no significant associations between each coronal alignment group. CONCLUSION The present study found that overall varus and valgus alignment were influenced more often by the tibia, or the mMPTA, than by the femur, especially for valgus alignment. Additionally, female patients exhibited significantly more overall valgus alignment than male patients, with the tibia being the primary determinant of valgus alignment. Finally, coronal alignment did not influence concomitant meniscal, chondral, or ligament injuries.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信