决策能力评估。对辅助自杀请求的适用性进行系统审查和分析。

IF 6.7
Leonie Kupsch, Jakov Gather, Jochen Vollmann, Stephan Nadolny, Jan Schildmann
{"title":"决策能力评估。对辅助自杀请求的适用性进行系统审查和分析。","authors":"Leonie Kupsch, Jakov Gather, Jochen Vollmann, Stephan Nadolny, Jan Schildmann","doi":"10.1192/j.eurpsy.2025.10041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Decisional capacity is an important requirement for assisted suicide, which has been legalized in an increasing number of countries. While several instruments have been developed over the past few decades to assess the capacity to consent to treatment, little is known about their applicability to assessing capacity in the context of requests for assisted suicide.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Systematic review of instruments assessing decisional capacity published up to March 2024. Data concerning criteria for determining decisional capacity, psychometric properties, and other aspects were extracted from all instruments included. Selected instruments were analyzed regarding their applicability to requests for assisted suicide.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 23 instruments assessing the capacity to consent to treatment. There is considerable heterogeneity regarding the criteria utilized for assessing decisional capacity and their operationalization. Next to more cognitive abilities, some instruments directly incorporated emotions and values. Five instruments were assessed for applicability to requests for assisted suicide. The framing of decisional capacity within the context of disease and treatment options frequently limits the application of instruments to assess decisional capacity in the context of requests for assisted suicide.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>No instrument could be identified that could be applied to assessing decisional capacity in the context of requests for assisted suicide without any limitations or without necessitating adjustments. Further normative and empirical work is required for developing an instrument that could be applicable in this context.</p>","PeriodicalId":520621,"journal":{"name":"European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists","volume":"68 1","pages":"e91"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12260724/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of decisional capacity. A systematic review and analysis of instruments regarding their applicability to requests for assisted suicide.\",\"authors\":\"Leonie Kupsch, Jakov Gather, Jochen Vollmann, Stephan Nadolny, Jan Schildmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1192/j.eurpsy.2025.10041\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Decisional capacity is an important requirement for assisted suicide, which has been legalized in an increasing number of countries. While several instruments have been developed over the past few decades to assess the capacity to consent to treatment, little is known about their applicability to assessing capacity in the context of requests for assisted suicide.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Systematic review of instruments assessing decisional capacity published up to March 2024. Data concerning criteria for determining decisional capacity, psychometric properties, and other aspects were extracted from all instruments included. Selected instruments were analyzed regarding their applicability to requests for assisted suicide.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 23 instruments assessing the capacity to consent to treatment. There is considerable heterogeneity regarding the criteria utilized for assessing decisional capacity and their operationalization. Next to more cognitive abilities, some instruments directly incorporated emotions and values. Five instruments were assessed for applicability to requests for assisted suicide. The framing of decisional capacity within the context of disease and treatment options frequently limits the application of instruments to assess decisional capacity in the context of requests for assisted suicide.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>No instrument could be identified that could be applied to assessing decisional capacity in the context of requests for assisted suicide without any limitations or without necessitating adjustments. Further normative and empirical work is required for developing an instrument that could be applicable in this context.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520621,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists\",\"volume\":\"68 1\",\"pages\":\"e91\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12260724/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2025.10041\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2025.10041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:决策能力是协助自杀的重要要求,在越来越多的国家已经合法化。虽然在过去的几十年里已经开发了一些工具来评估同意治疗的能力,但人们对它们在评估协助自杀请求背景下的能力方面的适用性知之甚少。方法:系统回顾截至2024年3月发表的决策能力评估工具。从包括的所有工具中提取有关决定决策能力、心理测量特性和其他方面的标准的数据。分析了所选工具对协助自杀请求的适用性。结果:我们确定了23种评估同意治疗能力的工具。用于评估决策能力及其运作的标准存在相当大的差异。除了更多的认知能力之外,一些工具直接融入了情感和价值观。评估了五种工具对协助自杀请求的适用性。在疾病和治疗选择的背景下界定决策能力,往往限制了在请求协助自杀的情况下评估决策能力的工具的应用。结论:在没有任何限制或必要调整的情况下,无法确定可以用于评估协助自杀请求背景下的决策能力的工具。需要进一步的规范和实证工作,以制定一项可适用于这方面的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of decisional capacity. A systematic review and analysis of instruments regarding their applicability to requests for assisted suicide.

Background: Decisional capacity is an important requirement for assisted suicide, which has been legalized in an increasing number of countries. While several instruments have been developed over the past few decades to assess the capacity to consent to treatment, little is known about their applicability to assessing capacity in the context of requests for assisted suicide.

Methods: Systematic review of instruments assessing decisional capacity published up to March 2024. Data concerning criteria for determining decisional capacity, psychometric properties, and other aspects were extracted from all instruments included. Selected instruments were analyzed regarding their applicability to requests for assisted suicide.

Results: We identified 23 instruments assessing the capacity to consent to treatment. There is considerable heterogeneity regarding the criteria utilized for assessing decisional capacity and their operationalization. Next to more cognitive abilities, some instruments directly incorporated emotions and values. Five instruments were assessed for applicability to requests for assisted suicide. The framing of decisional capacity within the context of disease and treatment options frequently limits the application of instruments to assess decisional capacity in the context of requests for assisted suicide.

Conclusions: No instrument could be identified that could be applied to assessing decisional capacity in the context of requests for assisted suicide without any limitations or without necessitating adjustments. Further normative and empirical work is required for developing an instrument that could be applicable in this context.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信