保留射血分数的心力衰竭患者右心室超声心动图参数与HFA-PEFF评分的关系。

Hacı Ali Kürklü, Türkan Seda Tan, Nil Özyüncü, Kerim Esenboğa, İrem Dinçer
{"title":"保留射血分数的心力衰竭患者右心室超声心动图参数与HFA-PEFF评分的关系。","authors":"Hacı Ali Kürklü, Türkan Seda Tan, Nil Özyüncü, Kerim Esenboğa, İrem Dinçer","doi":"10.5543/tkda.2025.25905","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a leading clinical syndrome, accounting for more than 50% of hospitalizations due to heart failure. The HFA-PEFF algorithm, used for the diagnosis of HFpEF, also has prognostic value. The primary purpose of this work was to explore the relationship between the HFA-PEFF score and right ventricular (RV) echocardiographic parameters.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>127 patients diagnosed with HFpEF between January 2021 and November 2024, with adequate transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) images, were retrospectively evaluated. Patients were categorized into three prognostic risk groups based on their HFA-PEFF scores: low (0-2), intermediate (3-4) and high (5-6). RV function was assessed using Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), tricuspid annular S' velocity and RV free wall longitudinal strain (RVFW GLS). The relationship between the HFA-PEFF score and RV parameters was evaluated using One-way ANOVA and Spearman correlation analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients with high HFA-PEFF scores showed significant deterioration in TAPSE and RV GLS values. A moderate negative correlation was observed between HFA-PEFF score and RVFW GLS (r = 0.50, P < 0.001), while a mild negative correlation was found with TAPSE (r = -0.35, P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In HFpEF patients with poor prognosis as identified by the HFA-PEFF score, there was a marked deterioration in RV parameters, particularly RVFW 2D GLS and TAPSE. These findings suggest that incorporating RV parameters into HFpEF diagnostic and prognostic algorithms might provide additional clinical value.</p>","PeriodicalId":94261,"journal":{"name":"Turk Kardiyoloji Dernegi arsivi : Turk Kardiyoloji Derneginin yayin organidir","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association Between Right Ventricular Echocardiographic Parameters and HFA-PEFF Score in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction.\",\"authors\":\"Hacı Ali Kürklü, Türkan Seda Tan, Nil Özyüncü, Kerim Esenboğa, İrem Dinçer\",\"doi\":\"10.5543/tkda.2025.25905\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a leading clinical syndrome, accounting for more than 50% of hospitalizations due to heart failure. The HFA-PEFF algorithm, used for the diagnosis of HFpEF, also has prognostic value. The primary purpose of this work was to explore the relationship between the HFA-PEFF score and right ventricular (RV) echocardiographic parameters.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>127 patients diagnosed with HFpEF between January 2021 and November 2024, with adequate transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) images, were retrospectively evaluated. Patients were categorized into three prognostic risk groups based on their HFA-PEFF scores: low (0-2), intermediate (3-4) and high (5-6). RV function was assessed using Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), tricuspid annular S' velocity and RV free wall longitudinal strain (RVFW GLS). The relationship between the HFA-PEFF score and RV parameters was evaluated using One-way ANOVA and Spearman correlation analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients with high HFA-PEFF scores showed significant deterioration in TAPSE and RV GLS values. A moderate negative correlation was observed between HFA-PEFF score and RVFW GLS (r = 0.50, P < 0.001), while a mild negative correlation was found with TAPSE (r = -0.35, P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In HFpEF patients with poor prognosis as identified by the HFA-PEFF score, there was a marked deterioration in RV parameters, particularly RVFW 2D GLS and TAPSE. These findings suggest that incorporating RV parameters into HFpEF diagnostic and prognostic algorithms might provide additional clinical value.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94261,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Turk Kardiyoloji Dernegi arsivi : Turk Kardiyoloji Derneginin yayin organidir\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Turk Kardiyoloji Dernegi arsivi : Turk Kardiyoloji Derneginin yayin organidir\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5543/tkda.2025.25905\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turk Kardiyoloji Dernegi arsivi : Turk Kardiyoloji Derneginin yayin organidir","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5543/tkda.2025.25905","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:心力衰竭伴保留射血分数(HFpEF)是一种主要的临床综合征,占因心力衰竭住院的50%以上。用于HFpEF诊断的HFA-PEFF算法也具有预后价值。本研究的主要目的是探讨HFA-PEFF评分与右心室超声心动图参数之间的关系。方法:回顾性分析2021年1月至2024年11月诊断为HFpEF的127例经胸超声心动图(TTE)图像充足的患者。根据患者的HFA-PEFF评分将患者分为三个预后风险组:低(0-2)、中(3-4)和高(5-6)。采用三尖瓣环平面收缩位移(TAPSE)、三尖瓣环S’速度和右心室自由壁纵向应变(RVFW GLS)评估右心室功能。采用单因素方差分析和Spearman相关分析评价HFA-PEFF评分与RV参数之间的关系。结果:HFA-PEFF评分高的患者TAPSE和RV GLS值明显恶化。HFA-PEFF评分与RVFW GLS呈中度负相关(r = 0.50, P < 0.001),与TAPSE呈轻度负相关(r = -0.35, P < 0.001)。结论:HFA-PEFF评分判定预后不良的HFpEF患者,RV参数明显恶化,尤其是RVFW 2D GLS和TAPSE。这些发现表明,将RV参数纳入HFpEF诊断和预后算法可能会提供额外的临床价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Association Between Right Ventricular Echocardiographic Parameters and HFA-PEFF Score in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction.

Objective: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a leading clinical syndrome, accounting for more than 50% of hospitalizations due to heart failure. The HFA-PEFF algorithm, used for the diagnosis of HFpEF, also has prognostic value. The primary purpose of this work was to explore the relationship between the HFA-PEFF score and right ventricular (RV) echocardiographic parameters.

Methods: 127 patients diagnosed with HFpEF between January 2021 and November 2024, with adequate transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) images, were retrospectively evaluated. Patients were categorized into three prognostic risk groups based on their HFA-PEFF scores: low (0-2), intermediate (3-4) and high (5-6). RV function was assessed using Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), tricuspid annular S' velocity and RV free wall longitudinal strain (RVFW GLS). The relationship between the HFA-PEFF score and RV parameters was evaluated using One-way ANOVA and Spearman correlation analysis.

Results: Patients with high HFA-PEFF scores showed significant deterioration in TAPSE and RV GLS values. A moderate negative correlation was observed between HFA-PEFF score and RVFW GLS (r = 0.50, P < 0.001), while a mild negative correlation was found with TAPSE (r = -0.35, P < 0.001).

Conclusion: In HFpEF patients with poor prognosis as identified by the HFA-PEFF score, there was a marked deterioration in RV parameters, particularly RVFW 2D GLS and TAPSE. These findings suggest that incorporating RV parameters into HFpEF diagnostic and prognostic algorithms might provide additional clinical value.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信