Hyun Yang, Soon Sun Kim, Seong Hee Kang, Jieun Kwon, Do Young Kim, Eunju Kim, Hyun Phil Shin, Jeong Il Yu, Jeong-Ju Yoo, Eileen L Yoon, Sangheun Lee, Young Eun Chon, Janghan Jung, Jaekyung Cheon, Woosun Choi, Seul Ki Han, Ji Eun Han, Moon Haeng Hur, Hyun Woong Lee, Hyung Joon Kim
{"title":"韩国肝细胞癌全身治疗指征的专家调查:衔接临床实践和报销标准。","authors":"Hyun Yang, Soon Sun Kim, Seong Hee Kang, Jieun Kwon, Do Young Kim, Eunju Kim, Hyun Phil Shin, Jeong Il Yu, Jeong-Ju Yoo, Eileen L Yoon, Sangheun Lee, Young Eun Chon, Janghan Jung, Jaekyung Cheon, Woosun Choi, Seul Ki Han, Ji Eun Han, Moon Haeng Hur, Hyun Woong Lee, Hyung Joon Kim","doi":"10.17998/jlc.2025.07.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This survey aimed to collect expert opinions from multidisciplinary specialists involved in the management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in Korea regarding real-world criteria for systemic therapy indications. In response to discrepancies between national reimbursement policies and clinical decision-making, members of the Korean Liver Cancer Association and Korean Association for the Study of the Liver participated in a web-based survey from February 4 to 14, 2025. A total of 89 respondents, primarily experienced clinicians, provided their views on major clinical scenarios including infiltrative HCC, bilobar multifocal disease, huge tumors, vascular invasion, extrahepatic metastasis, and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) refractoriness. There was high agreement for including infiltrative HCC (69.7%), suspected portal vein invasion (70.8%), and TACE refractoriness (82.0%) as systemic therapy indications. TACE refractoriness, in particular, aligns with current guideline definitions. Additionally, over half of respondents (51.7%) supported extrahepatic metastasis under similar conditions. Notably, multidisciplinary discussion was emphasized across scenarios, but many respondents also favored allowing primary physician discretion in select cases. This report provides consolidated expert input to inform future updates to reimbursement policies and promote alignment with real-world clinical practice. These findings may help bridge the gap between national coverage criteria and clinical decision in systemic therapy for HCC.</p>","PeriodicalId":94087,"journal":{"name":"Journal of liver cancer","volume":" ","pages":"160-168"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12518990/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Expert survey on systemic therapy indications for hepatocellular carcinoma in Korea: bridging clinical practice and reimbursement criteria.\",\"authors\":\"Hyun Yang, Soon Sun Kim, Seong Hee Kang, Jieun Kwon, Do Young Kim, Eunju Kim, Hyun Phil Shin, Jeong Il Yu, Jeong-Ju Yoo, Eileen L Yoon, Sangheun Lee, Young Eun Chon, Janghan Jung, Jaekyung Cheon, Woosun Choi, Seul Ki Han, Ji Eun Han, Moon Haeng Hur, Hyun Woong Lee, Hyung Joon Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.17998/jlc.2025.07.02\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This survey aimed to collect expert opinions from multidisciplinary specialists involved in the management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in Korea regarding real-world criteria for systemic therapy indications. In response to discrepancies between national reimbursement policies and clinical decision-making, members of the Korean Liver Cancer Association and Korean Association for the Study of the Liver participated in a web-based survey from February 4 to 14, 2025. A total of 89 respondents, primarily experienced clinicians, provided their views on major clinical scenarios including infiltrative HCC, bilobar multifocal disease, huge tumors, vascular invasion, extrahepatic metastasis, and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) refractoriness. There was high agreement for including infiltrative HCC (69.7%), suspected portal vein invasion (70.8%), and TACE refractoriness (82.0%) as systemic therapy indications. TACE refractoriness, in particular, aligns with current guideline definitions. Additionally, over half of respondents (51.7%) supported extrahepatic metastasis under similar conditions. Notably, multidisciplinary discussion was emphasized across scenarios, but many respondents also favored allowing primary physician discretion in select cases. This report provides consolidated expert input to inform future updates to reimbursement policies and promote alignment with real-world clinical practice. These findings may help bridge the gap between national coverage criteria and clinical decision in systemic therapy for HCC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94087,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of liver cancer\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"160-168\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12518990/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of liver cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17998/jlc.2025.07.02\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of liver cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17998/jlc.2025.07.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Expert survey on systemic therapy indications for hepatocellular carcinoma in Korea: bridging clinical practice and reimbursement criteria.
This survey aimed to collect expert opinions from multidisciplinary specialists involved in the management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in Korea regarding real-world criteria for systemic therapy indications. In response to discrepancies between national reimbursement policies and clinical decision-making, members of the Korean Liver Cancer Association and Korean Association for the Study of the Liver participated in a web-based survey from February 4 to 14, 2025. A total of 89 respondents, primarily experienced clinicians, provided their views on major clinical scenarios including infiltrative HCC, bilobar multifocal disease, huge tumors, vascular invasion, extrahepatic metastasis, and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) refractoriness. There was high agreement for including infiltrative HCC (69.7%), suspected portal vein invasion (70.8%), and TACE refractoriness (82.0%) as systemic therapy indications. TACE refractoriness, in particular, aligns with current guideline definitions. Additionally, over half of respondents (51.7%) supported extrahepatic metastasis under similar conditions. Notably, multidisciplinary discussion was emphasized across scenarios, but many respondents also favored allowing primary physician discretion in select cases. This report provides consolidated expert input to inform future updates to reimbursement policies and promote alignment with real-world clinical practice. These findings may help bridge the gap between national coverage criteria and clinical decision in systemic therapy for HCC.