belimumab和anifrolumab治疗系统性红斑狼疮的实际疗效:疾病活动性和糖皮质激素减少的可比趋势

IF 2.9 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY
Ryota Sato, Masaru Shimizu, Yuya Kondo, Kazushi Maruo, Yuki Kuroda, Hiroshi Ebe, Mizuki Yagishita, Naoto Umeda, Seiji Mogi, Ayako Ohyama, Ayako Kitada, Saori Abe, Hiromitsu Asashima, Haruka Miki, Hiroto Tsuboi, Isao Matsumoto
{"title":"belimumab和anifrolumab治疗系统性红斑狼疮的实际疗效:疾病活动性和糖皮质激素减少的可比趋势","authors":"Ryota Sato, Masaru Shimizu, Yuya Kondo, Kazushi Maruo, Yuki Kuroda, Hiroshi Ebe, Mizuki Yagishita, Naoto Umeda, Seiji Mogi, Ayako Ohyama, Ayako Kitada, Saori Abe, Hiromitsu Asashima, Haruka Miki, Hiroto Tsuboi, Isao Matsumoto","doi":"10.1080/25785826.2025.2528296","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite the proven efficacy of belimumab and anifrolumab for SLE, their relative effectiveness remains uncertain owing to conflicting indirect comparison studies. We conducted a comparative effectiveness study using multicenter health records to evaluate the adjusted 12-month changes in the SLE Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K), glucocorticoid dose, anti-DNA antibody titers, and CH50 levels, along with the adjusted hazard ratios of discontinuation and adverse events. A total of 58 bionaïve lupus patients (belimumab: 36, anifrolumab: 22) who initiated belimumab or anifrolumab on or after January 1, 2022 were identified and followed for up to 2 years. Adjusted changes in the SLEDAI-2K, glucocorticoid dose, and anti-DNA antibody titers were similar, with between-group differences (belimumab - anifrolumab) of -0.4 SLEDAI-2K units (95% CI: -4.8, 4.0), 1.4 mg/day (95% CI: -5.1, 7.9), and -2.7 IU/mL (95% CI: -27, 21), respectively. Belimumab was associated with a greater increase in adjusted CH50 levels (between-group difference: 5.3 CH50/mL, 95% CI: -8.9, 20) and a lower adjusted hazard ratio of discontinuation (0.68, 95% CI: 0.12, 3.7). Infection was the most common adverse event (belimumab: 31%, anifrolumab: 41%). Our findings suggest both treatments provide similar effectiveness, with belimumab offering potential benefits in CH50 levels, treatment continuity, and infection risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":37286,"journal":{"name":"Immunological Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Real-world effectiveness of belimumab and anifrolumab in systemic lupus erythematosus: comparable trends in disease activity and glucocorticoid reduction.\",\"authors\":\"Ryota Sato, Masaru Shimizu, Yuya Kondo, Kazushi Maruo, Yuki Kuroda, Hiroshi Ebe, Mizuki Yagishita, Naoto Umeda, Seiji Mogi, Ayako Ohyama, Ayako Kitada, Saori Abe, Hiromitsu Asashima, Haruka Miki, Hiroto Tsuboi, Isao Matsumoto\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/25785826.2025.2528296\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Despite the proven efficacy of belimumab and anifrolumab for SLE, their relative effectiveness remains uncertain owing to conflicting indirect comparison studies. We conducted a comparative effectiveness study using multicenter health records to evaluate the adjusted 12-month changes in the SLE Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K), glucocorticoid dose, anti-DNA antibody titers, and CH50 levels, along with the adjusted hazard ratios of discontinuation and adverse events. A total of 58 bionaïve lupus patients (belimumab: 36, anifrolumab: 22) who initiated belimumab or anifrolumab on or after January 1, 2022 were identified and followed for up to 2 years. Adjusted changes in the SLEDAI-2K, glucocorticoid dose, and anti-DNA antibody titers were similar, with between-group differences (belimumab - anifrolumab) of -0.4 SLEDAI-2K units (95% CI: -4.8, 4.0), 1.4 mg/day (95% CI: -5.1, 7.9), and -2.7 IU/mL (95% CI: -27, 21), respectively. Belimumab was associated with a greater increase in adjusted CH50 levels (between-group difference: 5.3 CH50/mL, 95% CI: -8.9, 20) and a lower adjusted hazard ratio of discontinuation (0.68, 95% CI: 0.12, 3.7). Infection was the most common adverse event (belimumab: 31%, anifrolumab: 41%). Our findings suggest both treatments provide similar effectiveness, with belimumab offering potential benefits in CH50 levels, treatment continuity, and infection risk.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37286,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Immunological Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Immunological Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/25785826.2025.2528296\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Immunological Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/25785826.2025.2528296","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管已证实belimumab和anifrolumab治疗SLE的有效性,但由于相互矛盾的间接比较研究,它们的相对有效性仍然不确定。我们使用多中心健康记录进行了一项比较有效性研究,以评估调整后的SLE疾病活动指数2000 (SLEDAI-2K)、糖皮质激素剂量、抗dna抗体滴度和CH50水平的12个月变化,以及调整后的停药和不良事件的危险比。共有58例bionaïve狼疮患者(belimumab: 36例,anifrolumab: 22例)在2022年1月1日或之后开始使用belimumab或anifrolumab,并进行了长达2年的随访。SLEDAI-2K、糖皮质激素剂量和抗dna抗体滴度的调整变化相似,组间差异(贝利单抗- anifrolumab)分别为-0.4 SLEDAI-2K单位(95% CI: -4.8, 4.0)、1.4 mg/天(95% CI: -5.1, 7.9)和-2.7 IU/mL (95% CI: -27, 21)。贝利单抗与调整后的CH50水平显著升高(组间差异:5.3 CH50/mL, 95% CI: -8.9, 20)和较低的停药调整风险比相关(0.68,95% CI: 0.12, 3.7)。感染是最常见的不良事件(belimumab: 31%, anifrolumab: 41%)。我们的研究结果表明,两种治疗方法具有相似的疗效,贝利单抗在CH50水平、治疗连续性和感染风险方面具有潜在的益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Real-world effectiveness of belimumab and anifrolumab in systemic lupus erythematosus: comparable trends in disease activity and glucocorticoid reduction.

Despite the proven efficacy of belimumab and anifrolumab for SLE, their relative effectiveness remains uncertain owing to conflicting indirect comparison studies. We conducted a comparative effectiveness study using multicenter health records to evaluate the adjusted 12-month changes in the SLE Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K), glucocorticoid dose, anti-DNA antibody titers, and CH50 levels, along with the adjusted hazard ratios of discontinuation and adverse events. A total of 58 bionaïve lupus patients (belimumab: 36, anifrolumab: 22) who initiated belimumab or anifrolumab on or after January 1, 2022 were identified and followed for up to 2 years. Adjusted changes in the SLEDAI-2K, glucocorticoid dose, and anti-DNA antibody titers were similar, with between-group differences (belimumab - anifrolumab) of -0.4 SLEDAI-2K units (95% CI: -4.8, 4.0), 1.4 mg/day (95% CI: -5.1, 7.9), and -2.7 IU/mL (95% CI: -27, 21), respectively. Belimumab was associated with a greater increase in adjusted CH50 levels (between-group difference: 5.3 CH50/mL, 95% CI: -8.9, 20) and a lower adjusted hazard ratio of discontinuation (0.68, 95% CI: 0.12, 3.7). Infection was the most common adverse event (belimumab: 31%, anifrolumab: 41%). Our findings suggest both treatments provide similar effectiveness, with belimumab offering potential benefits in CH50 levels, treatment continuity, and infection risk.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Immunological Medicine
Immunological Medicine Medicine-Immunology and Allergy
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
2.30%
发文量
19
审稿时长
19 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信