Shilin Sun, Min Liu, Han Liu, Wenyuan He, Ying Zheng, Boyang Zheng, Weiwei Quan
{"title":"中国心血管内科医师胜任力模型构建研究。","authors":"Shilin Sun, Min Liu, Han Liu, Wenyuan He, Ying Zheng, Boyang Zheng, Weiwei Quan","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-09512-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Since the beginning of the 21st century, China's socioeconomic progress has altered lifestyles, accelerated urbanization, and population aging, significantly raising the risk of cardiovascular diseases (CVD). Currently, CVD stands as China's primary cause of death, necessitating the establishment of a high-quality cardiovascular workforce. While international research on competence models for cardiovascular physicians exists, the unique characteristics of Chinese CVD warrant a tailored approach. Despite numerous studies on competence models for clinical physicians in China, a model specific to cardiovascular physicians, aligned with the Chinese context, is lacking. This study aims to develop such a model to address CVD challenges and aid in recruitment, assessment, and training, aligning with the objectives of the \"Healthy China 2030\" plan. Utilizing a modified Delphi method, this study conducted two rounds of Delphi surveys involving 20 experts from renowned cardiovascular departments in Guangdong Province, China, based on literature reviews, behavioral event interviews, and expert consultations. Rigor and scientific validity were enhanced through measures such as experts' positive coefficient, experts' authority coefficient, and experts' coordination coefficient. Weightings for primary and secondary indicators were calculated using the Analytic Hierarchy Process and percentage weighting methods. The final cardiovascular physician competency model, tailored to the Chinese context, was determined. In both rounds of the Delphi surveys, the experts' positive coefficient exceeded 80%, the authority coefficient exceeded 0.7, and the p-values for the coordination coefficient were less than 0.01. These results indicate high accuracy and reliability, with strong expert consensus. The study developed a competency model comprising 8 primary indicators and 60 secondary indicators, with assigned weightings for each indicator. By utilizing an improved Delphi consensus process, the research team developed a competency model tailored to the Chinese context for cardiovascular physicians. This model encompasses various elements of clinical performance and professional behavior, and it is designed to provide effective guidance for the recruitment, evaluation, and residency training of cardiovascular physicians in China.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"24327"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12234680/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Study on the construction of a Chinese cardiovascular physician competency model.\",\"authors\":\"Shilin Sun, Min Liu, Han Liu, Wenyuan He, Ying Zheng, Boyang Zheng, Weiwei Quan\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41598-025-09512-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Since the beginning of the 21st century, China's socioeconomic progress has altered lifestyles, accelerated urbanization, and population aging, significantly raising the risk of cardiovascular diseases (CVD). Currently, CVD stands as China's primary cause of death, necessitating the establishment of a high-quality cardiovascular workforce. While international research on competence models for cardiovascular physicians exists, the unique characteristics of Chinese CVD warrant a tailored approach. Despite numerous studies on competence models for clinical physicians in China, a model specific to cardiovascular physicians, aligned with the Chinese context, is lacking. This study aims to develop such a model to address CVD challenges and aid in recruitment, assessment, and training, aligning with the objectives of the \\\"Healthy China 2030\\\" plan. Utilizing a modified Delphi method, this study conducted two rounds of Delphi surveys involving 20 experts from renowned cardiovascular departments in Guangdong Province, China, based on literature reviews, behavioral event interviews, and expert consultations. Rigor and scientific validity were enhanced through measures such as experts' positive coefficient, experts' authority coefficient, and experts' coordination coefficient. Weightings for primary and secondary indicators were calculated using the Analytic Hierarchy Process and percentage weighting methods. The final cardiovascular physician competency model, tailored to the Chinese context, was determined. In both rounds of the Delphi surveys, the experts' positive coefficient exceeded 80%, the authority coefficient exceeded 0.7, and the p-values for the coordination coefficient were less than 0.01. These results indicate high accuracy and reliability, with strong expert consensus. The study developed a competency model comprising 8 primary indicators and 60 secondary indicators, with assigned weightings for each indicator. By utilizing an improved Delphi consensus process, the research team developed a competency model tailored to the Chinese context for cardiovascular physicians. This model encompasses various elements of clinical performance and professional behavior, and it is designed to provide effective guidance for the recruitment, evaluation, and residency training of cardiovascular physicians in China.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"24327\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12234680/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-09512-y\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-09512-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Study on the construction of a Chinese cardiovascular physician competency model.
Since the beginning of the 21st century, China's socioeconomic progress has altered lifestyles, accelerated urbanization, and population aging, significantly raising the risk of cardiovascular diseases (CVD). Currently, CVD stands as China's primary cause of death, necessitating the establishment of a high-quality cardiovascular workforce. While international research on competence models for cardiovascular physicians exists, the unique characteristics of Chinese CVD warrant a tailored approach. Despite numerous studies on competence models for clinical physicians in China, a model specific to cardiovascular physicians, aligned with the Chinese context, is lacking. This study aims to develop such a model to address CVD challenges and aid in recruitment, assessment, and training, aligning with the objectives of the "Healthy China 2030" plan. Utilizing a modified Delphi method, this study conducted two rounds of Delphi surveys involving 20 experts from renowned cardiovascular departments in Guangdong Province, China, based on literature reviews, behavioral event interviews, and expert consultations. Rigor and scientific validity were enhanced through measures such as experts' positive coefficient, experts' authority coefficient, and experts' coordination coefficient. Weightings for primary and secondary indicators were calculated using the Analytic Hierarchy Process and percentage weighting methods. The final cardiovascular physician competency model, tailored to the Chinese context, was determined. In both rounds of the Delphi surveys, the experts' positive coefficient exceeded 80%, the authority coefficient exceeded 0.7, and the p-values for the coordination coefficient were less than 0.01. These results indicate high accuracy and reliability, with strong expert consensus. The study developed a competency model comprising 8 primary indicators and 60 secondary indicators, with assigned weightings for each indicator. By utilizing an improved Delphi consensus process, the research team developed a competency model tailored to the Chinese context for cardiovascular physicians. This model encompasses various elements of clinical performance and professional behavior, and it is designed to provide effective guidance for the recruitment, evaluation, and residency training of cardiovascular physicians in China.
期刊介绍:
We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections.
Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021).
•Engineering
Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live.
•Physical sciences
Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics.
•Earth and environmental sciences
Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems.
•Biological sciences
Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants.
•Health sciences
The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.