Veronica Y Chollette, Blair H Altman, Jennifer K McGee-Avila, Emily M Grenen, Paul B Jacobsen, Sarah Kobrin
{"title":"国家癌症研究所癌症中心和护理安全网设置之间的宫颈癌筛查合作,2022年。","authors":"Veronica Y Chollette, Blair H Altman, Jennifer K McGee-Avila, Emily M Grenen, Paul B Jacobsen, Sarah Kobrin","doi":"10.1177/00333549251316190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Supporting medically underserved and socially disadvantaged populations, particularly in relation to cervical cancer, requires identifying coordination gaps. However, approaches to address the cervical cancer screening process between cancer centers and safety-net settings of care (hereinafter, safety-net settings) are poorly understood. We describe interactions and identify opportunities to guide cancer centers that aim to strengthen cervical cancer prevention, screening, and treatment for patients referred to them from safety-net settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We administered a 15-item online survey from January 12 through February 9, 2022, to National Cancer Institute (NCI) cancer centers; the intended audience was associate directors of community outreach and engagement and/or associate directors of population sciences. Of 64 eligible cancer centers, 47 (73.4%) completed the survey; however, 7 cancer centers were excluded from analysis because they reported not having a formal arrangement with safety-net settings. We developed survey items in consultation with subject matter experts and conducted pilot testing before administration to sites.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The most common forms of partnership between NCI cancer centers and safety-net settings were referrals and consultations (34 of 40; 85.0%). We identified multilevel barriers affecting coordination and follow-up of abnormal cervical cancer screening test results. Communication between safety-net settings and cancer center staff was the most reported systems-level challenge to care coordination (35 of 40; 87.2%). Collection and synthesis of patient data presented the primary systems-level challenge to following up to abnormal cancer screening (34 of 40; 85.0%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Collaborations between cancer centers and safety-net settings are common but limited by challenges in care delivery and coordination. Our findings underscore the importance of identifying intervention points to optimize the management of cervical cancer care for patients in safety-net settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":20793,"journal":{"name":"Public Health Reports","volume":" ","pages":"333549251316190"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12237950/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cervical Cancer Screening Collaborations Between National Cancer Institute Cancer Centers and Safety-Net Settings of Care, 2022.\",\"authors\":\"Veronica Y Chollette, Blair H Altman, Jennifer K McGee-Avila, Emily M Grenen, Paul B Jacobsen, Sarah Kobrin\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00333549251316190\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Supporting medically underserved and socially disadvantaged populations, particularly in relation to cervical cancer, requires identifying coordination gaps. However, approaches to address the cervical cancer screening process between cancer centers and safety-net settings of care (hereinafter, safety-net settings) are poorly understood. We describe interactions and identify opportunities to guide cancer centers that aim to strengthen cervical cancer prevention, screening, and treatment for patients referred to them from safety-net settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We administered a 15-item online survey from January 12 through February 9, 2022, to National Cancer Institute (NCI) cancer centers; the intended audience was associate directors of community outreach and engagement and/or associate directors of population sciences. Of 64 eligible cancer centers, 47 (73.4%) completed the survey; however, 7 cancer centers were excluded from analysis because they reported not having a formal arrangement with safety-net settings. We developed survey items in consultation with subject matter experts and conducted pilot testing before administration to sites.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The most common forms of partnership between NCI cancer centers and safety-net settings were referrals and consultations (34 of 40; 85.0%). We identified multilevel barriers affecting coordination and follow-up of abnormal cervical cancer screening test results. Communication between safety-net settings and cancer center staff was the most reported systems-level challenge to care coordination (35 of 40; 87.2%). Collection and synthesis of patient data presented the primary systems-level challenge to following up to abnormal cancer screening (34 of 40; 85.0%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Collaborations between cancer centers and safety-net settings are common but limited by challenges in care delivery and coordination. Our findings underscore the importance of identifying intervention points to optimize the management of cervical cancer care for patients in safety-net settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20793,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Public Health Reports\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"333549251316190\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12237950/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Public Health Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00333549251316190\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00333549251316190","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Cervical Cancer Screening Collaborations Between National Cancer Institute Cancer Centers and Safety-Net Settings of Care, 2022.
Objectives: Supporting medically underserved and socially disadvantaged populations, particularly in relation to cervical cancer, requires identifying coordination gaps. However, approaches to address the cervical cancer screening process between cancer centers and safety-net settings of care (hereinafter, safety-net settings) are poorly understood. We describe interactions and identify opportunities to guide cancer centers that aim to strengthen cervical cancer prevention, screening, and treatment for patients referred to them from safety-net settings.
Methods: We administered a 15-item online survey from January 12 through February 9, 2022, to National Cancer Institute (NCI) cancer centers; the intended audience was associate directors of community outreach and engagement and/or associate directors of population sciences. Of 64 eligible cancer centers, 47 (73.4%) completed the survey; however, 7 cancer centers were excluded from analysis because they reported not having a formal arrangement with safety-net settings. We developed survey items in consultation with subject matter experts and conducted pilot testing before administration to sites.
Results: The most common forms of partnership between NCI cancer centers and safety-net settings were referrals and consultations (34 of 40; 85.0%). We identified multilevel barriers affecting coordination and follow-up of abnormal cervical cancer screening test results. Communication between safety-net settings and cancer center staff was the most reported systems-level challenge to care coordination (35 of 40; 87.2%). Collection and synthesis of patient data presented the primary systems-level challenge to following up to abnormal cancer screening (34 of 40; 85.0%).
Conclusions: Collaborations between cancer centers and safety-net settings are common but limited by challenges in care delivery and coordination. Our findings underscore the importance of identifying intervention points to optimize the management of cervical cancer care for patients in safety-net settings.
期刊介绍:
Public Health Reports is the official journal of the Office of the U.S. Surgeon General and the U.S. Public Health Service and has been published since 1878. It is published bimonthly, plus supplement issues, through an official agreement with the Association of Schools and Programs of Public Health. The journal is peer-reviewed and publishes original research and commentaries in the areas of public health practice and methodology, original research, public health law, and public health schools and teaching. Issues contain regular commentaries by the U.S. Surgeon General and executives of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Health.
The journal focuses upon such topics as tobacco control, teenage violence, occupational disease and injury, immunization, drug policy, lead screening, health disparities, and many other key and emerging public health issues. In addition to the six regular issues, PHR produces supplemental issues approximately 2-5 times per year which focus on specific topics that are of particular interest to our readership. The journal''s contributors are on the front line of public health and they present their work in a readable and accessible format.