国家癌症研究所癌症中心和护理安全网设置之间的宫颈癌筛查合作,2022年。

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Veronica Y Chollette, Blair H Altman, Jennifer K McGee-Avila, Emily M Grenen, Paul B Jacobsen, Sarah Kobrin
{"title":"国家癌症研究所癌症中心和护理安全网设置之间的宫颈癌筛查合作,2022年。","authors":"Veronica Y Chollette, Blair H Altman, Jennifer K McGee-Avila, Emily M Grenen, Paul B Jacobsen, Sarah Kobrin","doi":"10.1177/00333549251316190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Supporting medically underserved and socially disadvantaged populations, particularly in relation to cervical cancer, requires identifying coordination gaps. However, approaches to address the cervical cancer screening process between cancer centers and safety-net settings of care (hereinafter, safety-net settings) are poorly understood. We describe interactions and identify opportunities to guide cancer centers that aim to strengthen cervical cancer prevention, screening, and treatment for patients referred to them from safety-net settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We administered a 15-item online survey from January 12 through February 9, 2022, to National Cancer Institute (NCI) cancer centers; the intended audience was associate directors of community outreach and engagement and/or associate directors of population sciences. Of 64 eligible cancer centers, 47 (73.4%) completed the survey; however, 7 cancer centers were excluded from analysis because they reported not having a formal arrangement with safety-net settings. We developed survey items in consultation with subject matter experts and conducted pilot testing before administration to sites.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The most common forms of partnership between NCI cancer centers and safety-net settings were referrals and consultations (34 of 40; 85.0%). We identified multilevel barriers affecting coordination and follow-up of abnormal cervical cancer screening test results. Communication between safety-net settings and cancer center staff was the most reported systems-level challenge to care coordination (35 of 40; 87.2%). Collection and synthesis of patient data presented the primary systems-level challenge to following up to abnormal cancer screening (34 of 40; 85.0%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Collaborations between cancer centers and safety-net settings are common but limited by challenges in care delivery and coordination. Our findings underscore the importance of identifying intervention points to optimize the management of cervical cancer care for patients in safety-net settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":20793,"journal":{"name":"Public Health Reports","volume":" ","pages":"333549251316190"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12237950/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cervical Cancer Screening Collaborations Between National Cancer Institute Cancer Centers and Safety-Net Settings of Care, 2022.\",\"authors\":\"Veronica Y Chollette, Blair H Altman, Jennifer K McGee-Avila, Emily M Grenen, Paul B Jacobsen, Sarah Kobrin\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00333549251316190\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Supporting medically underserved and socially disadvantaged populations, particularly in relation to cervical cancer, requires identifying coordination gaps. However, approaches to address the cervical cancer screening process between cancer centers and safety-net settings of care (hereinafter, safety-net settings) are poorly understood. We describe interactions and identify opportunities to guide cancer centers that aim to strengthen cervical cancer prevention, screening, and treatment for patients referred to them from safety-net settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We administered a 15-item online survey from January 12 through February 9, 2022, to National Cancer Institute (NCI) cancer centers; the intended audience was associate directors of community outreach and engagement and/or associate directors of population sciences. Of 64 eligible cancer centers, 47 (73.4%) completed the survey; however, 7 cancer centers were excluded from analysis because they reported not having a formal arrangement with safety-net settings. We developed survey items in consultation with subject matter experts and conducted pilot testing before administration to sites.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The most common forms of partnership between NCI cancer centers and safety-net settings were referrals and consultations (34 of 40; 85.0%). We identified multilevel barriers affecting coordination and follow-up of abnormal cervical cancer screening test results. Communication between safety-net settings and cancer center staff was the most reported systems-level challenge to care coordination (35 of 40; 87.2%). Collection and synthesis of patient data presented the primary systems-level challenge to following up to abnormal cancer screening (34 of 40; 85.0%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Collaborations between cancer centers and safety-net settings are common but limited by challenges in care delivery and coordination. Our findings underscore the importance of identifying intervention points to optimize the management of cervical cancer care for patients in safety-net settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20793,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Public Health Reports\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"333549251316190\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12237950/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Public Health Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00333549251316190\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00333549251316190","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:支持医疗服务不足和社会处境不利的人口,特别是在宫颈癌方面,需要确定协调差距。然而,在癌症中心和护理安全网设置(以下简称安全网设置)之间解决宫颈癌筛查过程的方法知之甚少。我们描述了相互作用,并确定了指导癌症中心的机会,旨在加强宫颈癌的预防,筛查和治疗患者转介到他们的安全网设置。方法:我们于2022年1月12日至2月9日对美国国家癌症研究所(NCI)癌症中心进行了一项15项在线调查;目标听众是社区外展和参与的副主任和/或人口科学的副主任。在64个符合条件的癌症中心中,47个(73.4%)完成了调查;然而,有7家癌症中心被排除在分析之外,因为它们报告说没有正式安排安全网设置。我们在与主题专家协商后制定了调查项目,并在给药到现场之前进行了试点测试。结果:NCI癌症中心和安全网设置之间最常见的合作形式是转诊和咨询(34 / 40;85.0%)。我们发现了影响异常宫颈癌筛查结果协调和随访的多重障碍。安全网设置和癌症中心工作人员之间的沟通是对护理协调最具挑战性的系统级挑战(35 / 40;87.2%)。患者数据的收集和综合提出了对异常癌症筛查随访的主要系统级挑战(34 / 40;85.0%)。结论:癌症中心和安全网之间的合作是常见的,但受到护理提供和协调方面的挑战的限制。我们的研究结果强调了确定干预点的重要性,以优化在安全网设置的宫颈癌患者护理管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cervical Cancer Screening Collaborations Between National Cancer Institute Cancer Centers and Safety-Net Settings of Care, 2022.

Objectives: Supporting medically underserved and socially disadvantaged populations, particularly in relation to cervical cancer, requires identifying coordination gaps. However, approaches to address the cervical cancer screening process between cancer centers and safety-net settings of care (hereinafter, safety-net settings) are poorly understood. We describe interactions and identify opportunities to guide cancer centers that aim to strengthen cervical cancer prevention, screening, and treatment for patients referred to them from safety-net settings.

Methods: We administered a 15-item online survey from January 12 through February 9, 2022, to National Cancer Institute (NCI) cancer centers; the intended audience was associate directors of community outreach and engagement and/or associate directors of population sciences. Of 64 eligible cancer centers, 47 (73.4%) completed the survey; however, 7 cancer centers were excluded from analysis because they reported not having a formal arrangement with safety-net settings. We developed survey items in consultation with subject matter experts and conducted pilot testing before administration to sites.

Results: The most common forms of partnership between NCI cancer centers and safety-net settings were referrals and consultations (34 of 40; 85.0%). We identified multilevel barriers affecting coordination and follow-up of abnormal cervical cancer screening test results. Communication between safety-net settings and cancer center staff was the most reported systems-level challenge to care coordination (35 of 40; 87.2%). Collection and synthesis of patient data presented the primary systems-level challenge to following up to abnormal cancer screening (34 of 40; 85.0%).

Conclusions: Collaborations between cancer centers and safety-net settings are common but limited by challenges in care delivery and coordination. Our findings underscore the importance of identifying intervention points to optimize the management of cervical cancer care for patients in safety-net settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Public Health Reports
Public Health Reports 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
6.10%
发文量
164
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Public Health Reports is the official journal of the Office of the U.S. Surgeon General and the U.S. Public Health Service and has been published since 1878. It is published bimonthly, plus supplement issues, through an official agreement with the Association of Schools and Programs of Public Health. The journal is peer-reviewed and publishes original research and commentaries in the areas of public health practice and methodology, original research, public health law, and public health schools and teaching. Issues contain regular commentaries by the U.S. Surgeon General and executives of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Health. The journal focuses upon such topics as tobacco control, teenage violence, occupational disease and injury, immunization, drug policy, lead screening, health disparities, and many other key and emerging public health issues. In addition to the six regular issues, PHR produces supplemental issues approximately 2-5 times per year which focus on specific topics that are of particular interest to our readership. The journal''s contributors are on the front line of public health and they present their work in a readable and accessible format.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信