Sarah H Heil, Loren S Kock, Roxanne F Harfmann, Kristin B Ashford, Janine Barnett, Andrea McCubbin, Michael J DeSarno, Stephen T Higgins
{"title":"试点随机临床试验检查使用极低尼古丁含量香烟在怀孕期间在美国。","authors":"Sarah H Heil, Loren S Kock, Roxanne F Harfmann, Kristin B Ashford, Janine Barnett, Andrea McCubbin, Michael J DeSarno, Stephen T Higgins","doi":"10.1016/j.ypmed.2025.108351","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Randomized controlled trials have shown that reducing the nicotine content of cigarettes decreases the number of cigarettes smoked per day (CPD) without engendering compensatory smoking. The present study examined whether those effects extend to smoking during pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Pregnant participants (≤25 weeks gestational age) in the U.S. with less than an Associate's degree and not planning to quit smoking were randomly assigned to smoke their usual brand (UB) cigarettes or very low nicotine content (VLNC) cigarettes (0.4 mg nicotine/g of tobacco) for 12 weeks. The primary outcome was total CPD at 12 weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline characteristics did not differ between conditions (14 UB, 16 VLNC), but smoking-related variables were indicative of heavy smoking and moderate-high nicotine dependence. Mean (±SE) total CPD at 12 weeks among completers (11 UB, 12 VLNC) did not differ between conditions (18.4 ± 2.3 and 16.3 ± 2.6, respectively), nor did it vary over time. VLNC cigarette use did not lead to compensatory smoking, greater withdrawal or craving, or any severe or serious adverse events, and birth outcomes were within normal ranges on average.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results suggest this sample of pregnant participants did not realize the same benefits of VLNC cigarettes that other not-pregnant samples have, although there was also no evidence of harm in the form of compensatory smoking or other adverse events. The sample's smoking characteristics suggest they were especially resistant to changing their smoking and it remains possible that those with more representative smoking patterns during pregnancy will respond to VLNC cigarettes as other populations have.</p><p><strong>Clinicaltrials: </strong>govID:NCT04033237.</p>","PeriodicalId":20339,"journal":{"name":"Preventive medicine","volume":" ","pages":"108351"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pilot randomized clinical trial examining use of very low nicotine content cigarettes during pregnancy in the United States.\",\"authors\":\"Sarah H Heil, Loren S Kock, Roxanne F Harfmann, Kristin B Ashford, Janine Barnett, Andrea McCubbin, Michael J DeSarno, Stephen T Higgins\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ypmed.2025.108351\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Randomized controlled trials have shown that reducing the nicotine content of cigarettes decreases the number of cigarettes smoked per day (CPD) without engendering compensatory smoking. The present study examined whether those effects extend to smoking during pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Pregnant participants (≤25 weeks gestational age) in the U.S. with less than an Associate's degree and not planning to quit smoking were randomly assigned to smoke their usual brand (UB) cigarettes or very low nicotine content (VLNC) cigarettes (0.4 mg nicotine/g of tobacco) for 12 weeks. The primary outcome was total CPD at 12 weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline characteristics did not differ between conditions (14 UB, 16 VLNC), but smoking-related variables were indicative of heavy smoking and moderate-high nicotine dependence. Mean (±SE) total CPD at 12 weeks among completers (11 UB, 12 VLNC) did not differ between conditions (18.4 ± 2.3 and 16.3 ± 2.6, respectively), nor did it vary over time. VLNC cigarette use did not lead to compensatory smoking, greater withdrawal or craving, or any severe or serious adverse events, and birth outcomes were within normal ranges on average.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results suggest this sample of pregnant participants did not realize the same benefits of VLNC cigarettes that other not-pregnant samples have, although there was also no evidence of harm in the form of compensatory smoking or other adverse events. The sample's smoking characteristics suggest they were especially resistant to changing their smoking and it remains possible that those with more representative smoking patterns during pregnancy will respond to VLNC cigarettes as other populations have.</p><p><strong>Clinicaltrials: </strong>govID:NCT04033237.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20339,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Preventive medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"108351\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Preventive medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2025.108351\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Preventive medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2025.108351","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Pilot randomized clinical trial examining use of very low nicotine content cigarettes during pregnancy in the United States.
Objective: Randomized controlled trials have shown that reducing the nicotine content of cigarettes decreases the number of cigarettes smoked per day (CPD) without engendering compensatory smoking. The present study examined whether those effects extend to smoking during pregnancy.
Methods: Pregnant participants (≤25 weeks gestational age) in the U.S. with less than an Associate's degree and not planning to quit smoking were randomly assigned to smoke their usual brand (UB) cigarettes or very low nicotine content (VLNC) cigarettes (0.4 mg nicotine/g of tobacco) for 12 weeks. The primary outcome was total CPD at 12 weeks.
Results: Baseline characteristics did not differ between conditions (14 UB, 16 VLNC), but smoking-related variables were indicative of heavy smoking and moderate-high nicotine dependence. Mean (±SE) total CPD at 12 weeks among completers (11 UB, 12 VLNC) did not differ between conditions (18.4 ± 2.3 and 16.3 ± 2.6, respectively), nor did it vary over time. VLNC cigarette use did not lead to compensatory smoking, greater withdrawal or craving, or any severe or serious adverse events, and birth outcomes were within normal ranges on average.
Conclusions: Results suggest this sample of pregnant participants did not realize the same benefits of VLNC cigarettes that other not-pregnant samples have, although there was also no evidence of harm in the form of compensatory smoking or other adverse events. The sample's smoking characteristics suggest they were especially resistant to changing their smoking and it remains possible that those with more representative smoking patterns during pregnancy will respond to VLNC cigarettes as other populations have.
期刊介绍:
Founded in 1972 by Ernst Wynder, Preventive Medicine is an international scholarly journal that provides prompt publication of original articles on the science and practice of disease prevention, health promotion, and public health policymaking. Preventive Medicine aims to reward innovation. It will favor insightful observational studies, thoughtful explorations of health data, unsuspected new angles for existing hypotheses, robust randomized controlled trials, and impartial systematic reviews. Preventive Medicine''s ultimate goal is to publish research that will have an impact on the work of practitioners of disease prevention and health promotion, as well as of related disciplines.