与肥胖倾向大鼠相比,肥胖抵抗大鼠的身体表现有所改善:不同饮食和代谢分析的影响。

IF 2.6 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
PLoS ONE Pub Date : 2025-07-07 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0327670
Daniel Sesana da Silva, Matheus Corteletti Dos Santos, Lucas Furtado Domingos, Jóctan Pimentel Cordeiro, Kiany Miranda, Maria Gabriela Siqueira Tavares, Késsia Cristina Carvalho Santos, Ana Paula Lima-Leopoldo, André Soares Leopoldo
{"title":"与肥胖倾向大鼠相比,肥胖抵抗大鼠的身体表现有所改善:不同饮食和代谢分析的影响。","authors":"Daniel Sesana da Silva, Matheus Corteletti Dos Santos, Lucas Furtado Domingos, Jóctan Pimentel Cordeiro, Kiany Miranda, Maria Gabriela Siqueira Tavares, Késsia Cristina Carvalho Santos, Ana Paula Lima-Leopoldo, André Soares Leopoldo","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0327670","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Animal models, such as high-fat diet-induced obese (DIO) rats, have been used to understand its pathophysiology. These models reveal differences between obesity-prone (OP) and obesity-resistant (OR) phenotypes. Thus, OR exhibit lower body mass gain and higher levels of physical activity, suggesting a more efficient energy metabolism. This study evaluated the metabolic adaptations and physical performance of OP and OR rats. Wistar rats (30 days old) were subjected to 23-week obesity exposure protocols. Initially, rats were randomized into two groups: a) SD: fed a standard diet (n = 39) and b) HFD: fed a high-fat diet (n = 39). Subsequently, animals were characterized as OP and OR on their respective diets: SD-OR (n = 13); SD-OP (n = 13); HFD-OP (n = 13); HFD-OR (n = 13). Nutritional, metabolic, and adiposity parameters were analyzed. Basal metabolism assessment was performed using indirect calorimetry. Physical performance and aerobic capacity were determined through treadmill exercise tests with gas analyzers for maximal oxygen consumption (VO2). OR animals had lower body mass compared to OP animals, despite consuming the same caloric intake under both diets. HFD-OP rats gained 30.5% more weight than HFD-OR rats, while SD-OP rats gained 19.5% more than SD-OR rats. SD-OR rats gained 20.5% more weight than HFD-OR. No significant differences in adiposity indices were observed among groups. HFD-OR rats showed 15.6% higher VO₂max than HFD-OP rats; SD-OR rats had 12.8% higher VO₂max and 20.3% longer time to exhaustion compared to SD-OP rats. Indirect calorimetry revealed higher energy expenditure in OR animals during the dark cycle. OP animals exhibited elevated insulin and HOMA-IR levels, while OR animals had higher leptin and glucagon levels. In conclusion, OR rats showed improved physical performance and aerobic capacity compared to OP rats, even on a high-fat diet, suggesting that OR rats have adaptive mechanisms that enhance energy metabolism and endurance.</p>","PeriodicalId":20189,"journal":{"name":"PLoS ONE","volume":"20 7","pages":"e0327670"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12233250/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improved physical performance in obesity-resistant rats compared to obesity-prone rats: Effects of different diets and metabolic analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Sesana da Silva, Matheus Corteletti Dos Santos, Lucas Furtado Domingos, Jóctan Pimentel Cordeiro, Kiany Miranda, Maria Gabriela Siqueira Tavares, Késsia Cristina Carvalho Santos, Ana Paula Lima-Leopoldo, André Soares Leopoldo\",\"doi\":\"10.1371/journal.pone.0327670\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Animal models, such as high-fat diet-induced obese (DIO) rats, have been used to understand its pathophysiology. These models reveal differences between obesity-prone (OP) and obesity-resistant (OR) phenotypes. Thus, OR exhibit lower body mass gain and higher levels of physical activity, suggesting a more efficient energy metabolism. This study evaluated the metabolic adaptations and physical performance of OP and OR rats. Wistar rats (30 days old) were subjected to 23-week obesity exposure protocols. Initially, rats were randomized into two groups: a) SD: fed a standard diet (n = 39) and b) HFD: fed a high-fat diet (n = 39). Subsequently, animals were characterized as OP and OR on their respective diets: SD-OR (n = 13); SD-OP (n = 13); HFD-OP (n = 13); HFD-OR (n = 13). Nutritional, metabolic, and adiposity parameters were analyzed. Basal metabolism assessment was performed using indirect calorimetry. Physical performance and aerobic capacity were determined through treadmill exercise tests with gas analyzers for maximal oxygen consumption (VO2). OR animals had lower body mass compared to OP animals, despite consuming the same caloric intake under both diets. HFD-OP rats gained 30.5% more weight than HFD-OR rats, while SD-OP rats gained 19.5% more than SD-OR rats. SD-OR rats gained 20.5% more weight than HFD-OR. No significant differences in adiposity indices were observed among groups. HFD-OR rats showed 15.6% higher VO₂max than HFD-OP rats; SD-OR rats had 12.8% higher VO₂max and 20.3% longer time to exhaustion compared to SD-OP rats. Indirect calorimetry revealed higher energy expenditure in OR animals during the dark cycle. OP animals exhibited elevated insulin and HOMA-IR levels, while OR animals had higher leptin and glucagon levels. In conclusion, OR rats showed improved physical performance and aerobic capacity compared to OP rats, even on a high-fat diet, suggesting that OR rats have adaptive mechanisms that enhance energy metabolism and endurance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PLoS ONE\",\"volume\":\"20 7\",\"pages\":\"e0327670\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12233250/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PLoS ONE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0327670\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS ONE","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0327670","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

动物模型,如高脂肪饮食诱导肥胖(DIO)大鼠,已被用来了解其病理生理。这些模型揭示了肥胖倾向型(OP)和肥胖抵抗型(OR)表型之间的差异。因此,OR表现出较低的体重增加和较高的身体活动水平,表明更有效的能量代谢。本研究评估了OP和OR大鼠的代谢适应和体能表现。Wistar大鼠(30天大)接受23周的肥胖暴露方案。最初,将大鼠随机分为两组:a) SD:饲喂标准饲料(n = 39), b) HFD:饲喂高脂肪饲料(n = 39)。随后,将动物分为OP和OR两种:SD-OR (n = 13);SD-OP (n = 13);HFD-OP (n = 13);HFD-OR (n = 13)。分析营养、代谢和脂肪参数。使用间接量热法进行基础代谢评估。身体表现和有氧能力通过跑步机运动试验与气体分析仪测定最大耗氧量(VO2)。尽管在两种饮食中摄入的热量相同,但与OP动物相比,OR动物的体重更低。HFD-OP大鼠比HFD-OR大鼠增重30.5%,SD-OP大鼠比SD-OR大鼠增重19.5%。SD-OR大鼠比HFD-OR大鼠增重20.5%。各组肥胖指数无显著差异。HFD-OR大鼠的vo2max比HFD-OP大鼠高15.6%;与SD-OP大鼠相比,SD-OR大鼠的VO 2 max高12.8%,疲劳时间长20.3%。间接量热法显示,黑暗周期中OR动物的能量消耗较高。OP动物的胰岛素和HOMA-IR水平升高,而OR动物的瘦素和胰高血糖素水平升高。综上所述,与OP大鼠相比,即使在高脂肪饮食中,OR大鼠也表现出更好的身体表现和有氧能力,这表明OR大鼠具有增强能量代谢和耐力的适应机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Improved physical performance in obesity-resistant rats compared to obesity-prone rats: Effects of different diets and metabolic analysis.

Improved physical performance in obesity-resistant rats compared to obesity-prone rats: Effects of different diets and metabolic analysis.

Improved physical performance in obesity-resistant rats compared to obesity-prone rats: Effects of different diets and metabolic analysis.

Improved physical performance in obesity-resistant rats compared to obesity-prone rats: Effects of different diets and metabolic analysis.

Animal models, such as high-fat diet-induced obese (DIO) rats, have been used to understand its pathophysiology. These models reveal differences between obesity-prone (OP) and obesity-resistant (OR) phenotypes. Thus, OR exhibit lower body mass gain and higher levels of physical activity, suggesting a more efficient energy metabolism. This study evaluated the metabolic adaptations and physical performance of OP and OR rats. Wistar rats (30 days old) were subjected to 23-week obesity exposure protocols. Initially, rats were randomized into two groups: a) SD: fed a standard diet (n = 39) and b) HFD: fed a high-fat diet (n = 39). Subsequently, animals were characterized as OP and OR on their respective diets: SD-OR (n = 13); SD-OP (n = 13); HFD-OP (n = 13); HFD-OR (n = 13). Nutritional, metabolic, and adiposity parameters were analyzed. Basal metabolism assessment was performed using indirect calorimetry. Physical performance and aerobic capacity were determined through treadmill exercise tests with gas analyzers for maximal oxygen consumption (VO2). OR animals had lower body mass compared to OP animals, despite consuming the same caloric intake under both diets. HFD-OP rats gained 30.5% more weight than HFD-OR rats, while SD-OP rats gained 19.5% more than SD-OR rats. SD-OR rats gained 20.5% more weight than HFD-OR. No significant differences in adiposity indices were observed among groups. HFD-OR rats showed 15.6% higher VO₂max than HFD-OP rats; SD-OR rats had 12.8% higher VO₂max and 20.3% longer time to exhaustion compared to SD-OP rats. Indirect calorimetry revealed higher energy expenditure in OR animals during the dark cycle. OP animals exhibited elevated insulin and HOMA-IR levels, while OR animals had higher leptin and glucagon levels. In conclusion, OR rats showed improved physical performance and aerobic capacity compared to OP rats, even on a high-fat diet, suggesting that OR rats have adaptive mechanisms that enhance energy metabolism and endurance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
PLoS ONE
PLoS ONE 生物-生物学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.40%
发文量
14242
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: PLOS ONE is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online publication. PLOS ONE welcomes reports on primary research from any scientific discipline. It provides: * Open-access—freely accessible online, authors retain copyright * Fast publication times * Peer review by expert, practicing researchers * Post-publication tools to indicate quality and impact * Community-based dialogue on articles * Worldwide media coverage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信