STIMFIX™锚定经皮脊髓刺激试验:一项多中心研究的中期分析

IF 1.4 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Maja Green, Lakshmi Narra, Saurabh Dang, Jack Diep, Dipan Patel, Philip Lim, Joseph Atallah, Krishnan Chakravarthy
{"title":"STIMFIX™锚定经皮脊髓刺激试验:一项多中心研究的中期分析","authors":"Maja Green, Lakshmi Narra, Saurabh Dang, Jack Diep, Dipan Patel, Philip Lim, Joseph Atallah, Krishnan Chakravarthy","doi":"10.1080/17581869.2025.2527576","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Lead migration during percutaneous spinal cord stimulation (SCS) trials can undermine therapeutic efficacy. This study evaluates the effectiveness of the novel, noninvasive STIMFIX anchoring system in reducing lead migration compared to conventional anchoring techniques.</p><p><strong>Patients & methods: </strong>This interim analysis included two prospectively collected cohorts. Group 1 (<i>n</i> = 28) was a randomized, single-center trial comparing three anchoring methods: sutures (<i>n</i> = 9), adhesive tape (<i>n</i> = 10), and manufacturer-provided anchors (<i>n</i> = 9). Group 2 (<i>n</i> = 20) was a multicenter, open-label, non-randomized study using STIMFIX anchors. Lead migration was measured via standardized fluoroscopic imaging on Days 1 and 7.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean lead migration in Group 1 was 33.5 mm (manufacturer anchor), 29.4 mm (tape), and 21.1 mm (sutures), with no significant differences between groups (<i>p</i> = 0.404). Group 2 demonstrated an average lead migration of 19.5 mm with STIMFIX. No major adverse events were reported; one case of minor skin irritation resolved without intervention.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>STIMFIX demonstrated reduced lead migration compared to conventional methods, with favorable safety and ease of application. These findings support its use as a promising advancement in SCS trial anchoring.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>www.clinicaltrials.gov identifier is NCT05651646.</p>","PeriodicalId":20000,"journal":{"name":"Pain management","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"STIMFIX™ anchoring in percutaneous spinal cord stimulation trials: interim analysis of a multicenter study.\",\"authors\":\"Maja Green, Lakshmi Narra, Saurabh Dang, Jack Diep, Dipan Patel, Philip Lim, Joseph Atallah, Krishnan Chakravarthy\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17581869.2025.2527576\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Lead migration during percutaneous spinal cord stimulation (SCS) trials can undermine therapeutic efficacy. This study evaluates the effectiveness of the novel, noninvasive STIMFIX anchoring system in reducing lead migration compared to conventional anchoring techniques.</p><p><strong>Patients & methods: </strong>This interim analysis included two prospectively collected cohorts. Group 1 (<i>n</i> = 28) was a randomized, single-center trial comparing three anchoring methods: sutures (<i>n</i> = 9), adhesive tape (<i>n</i> = 10), and manufacturer-provided anchors (<i>n</i> = 9). Group 2 (<i>n</i> = 20) was a multicenter, open-label, non-randomized study using STIMFIX anchors. Lead migration was measured via standardized fluoroscopic imaging on Days 1 and 7.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean lead migration in Group 1 was 33.5 mm (manufacturer anchor), 29.4 mm (tape), and 21.1 mm (sutures), with no significant differences between groups (<i>p</i> = 0.404). Group 2 demonstrated an average lead migration of 19.5 mm with STIMFIX. No major adverse events were reported; one case of minor skin irritation resolved without intervention.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>STIMFIX demonstrated reduced lead migration compared to conventional methods, with favorable safety and ease of application. These findings support its use as a promising advancement in SCS trial anchoring.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>www.clinicaltrials.gov identifier is NCT05651646.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20000,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pain management\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-13\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pain management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17581869.2025.2527576\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17581869.2025.2527576","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在经皮脊髓刺激(SCS)试验中铅迁移会破坏治疗效果。与传统锚定技术相比,本研究评估了新型无创STIMFIX锚定系统在减少铅迁移方面的有效性。患者和方法:该中期分析包括两个前瞻性收集的队列。第1组(n = 28)是一项随机、单中心试验,比较三种锚定方法:缝线(n = 9)、胶带(n = 10)和制造商提供的锚定(n = 9)。第2组(n = 20)是一项多中心、开放标签、非随机研究,使用STIMFIX锚。在第1天和第7天通过标准化透视成像测量铅迁移。结果:组1平均铅移量为33.5 mm(制造商锚)、29.4 mm(胶带)和21.1 mm(缝线),组间差异无统计学意义(p = 0.404)。使用STIMFIX后,第二组的平均导联偏移量为19.5 mm。无重大不良事件报告;1例轻微的皮肤刺激在没有干预的情况下消失。结论:与传统方法相比,STIMFIX证明了铅迁移的减少,具有良好的安全性和易于应用。这些发现支持将其作为SCS试验锚定的一个有希望的进展。临床试验注册:www.clinicaltrials.gov标识符:NCT05651646。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
STIMFIX™ anchoring in percutaneous spinal cord stimulation trials: interim analysis of a multicenter study.

Aims: Lead migration during percutaneous spinal cord stimulation (SCS) trials can undermine therapeutic efficacy. This study evaluates the effectiveness of the novel, noninvasive STIMFIX anchoring system in reducing lead migration compared to conventional anchoring techniques.

Patients & methods: This interim analysis included two prospectively collected cohorts. Group 1 (n = 28) was a randomized, single-center trial comparing three anchoring methods: sutures (n = 9), adhesive tape (n = 10), and manufacturer-provided anchors (n = 9). Group 2 (n = 20) was a multicenter, open-label, non-randomized study using STIMFIX anchors. Lead migration was measured via standardized fluoroscopic imaging on Days 1 and 7.

Results: Mean lead migration in Group 1 was 33.5 mm (manufacturer anchor), 29.4 mm (tape), and 21.1 mm (sutures), with no significant differences between groups (p = 0.404). Group 2 demonstrated an average lead migration of 19.5 mm with STIMFIX. No major adverse events were reported; one case of minor skin irritation resolved without intervention.

Conclusions: STIMFIX demonstrated reduced lead migration compared to conventional methods, with favorable safety and ease of application. These findings support its use as a promising advancement in SCS trial anchoring.

Clinical trial registration: www.clinicaltrials.gov identifier is NCT05651646.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pain management
Pain management CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.90%
发文量
62
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信