基于神经网络的超高性能轻量化混凝土抗压强度估算。

IF 2.6 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
PLoS ONE Pub Date : 2025-07-07 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0326652
Yan Zhao, Ziyan Huang, Huilong Zhao, Zhen Xu, Wei Chang, Bai Liu
{"title":"基于神经网络的超高性能轻量化混凝土抗压强度估算。","authors":"Yan Zhao, Ziyan Huang, Huilong Zhao, Zhen Xu, Wei Chang, Bai Liu","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0326652","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>High strength and lightweight are key trends in concrete development. Achieving a balance between these properties to produce high structural efficiency (strength-to-weight ratio) concrete is challenging due to the complex relationship between compressive strength and material components. In this study, two artificial neural network (ANN) models-the BP and Elman networks were used to predict the compressive strength of ultra-high-performance lightweight concrete (UHPLC), based on a robust database of 115 test datasets from previous studies. The investigated parameters included the cement grade (Grade 42.5 and Grade 52.5), cement content (352 kg/m3-938 kg/m3), silica fume content (0 kg/m3-350 kg/m3), fly ash content (0 kg/m3-220 kg/m3), microsphere content (0 kg/m3-624 kg/m3), lightweight sand types (pottery sand, expanded perlite sand, and expanded shale lightweight sand), lightweight sand content (0 kg/m3-769 kg/m3), sand type (quartz sand, river sand), sand content (0 kg/m3-1314 kg/m3), water (90 kg/m3-395 kg/m3), water reduce (0 kg/m3-42.8 kg/m3), steel fiber content (0 kg/m3-234 kg/m3). Correlation analysis and sensitive analysis indicated that lightweight sand content and sand content had the most significant effects on UHPLC compressive strength, followed by water content. Conversely, fly ash content and lightweight sand type had minimal impact. The developed ANN models for UHPLC compressive strength demonstrated high predictive accuracy for both training and testing datasets, which the RMSE of BP network and Elman network were 0.226 and 0.160, respectively, while R2 of both two developed models were more than 0.98. Additionally, UHPLC exhibited a higher compressive strength-to-density ratio than high-strength concrete, ultra-high-performance concrete, and even Q235 steel. Three strategies were proposed for creating ultra-high-performance lightweight composites: optimizing packing density and lowering the water-binder ratio, along with careful selection of lightweight aggregates.</p>","PeriodicalId":20189,"journal":{"name":"PLoS ONE","volume":"20 7","pages":"e0326652"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12233282/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estimation of compressive strength of ultra-high performance lightweight concrete (UHPLC) using neural network.\",\"authors\":\"Yan Zhao, Ziyan Huang, Huilong Zhao, Zhen Xu, Wei Chang, Bai Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1371/journal.pone.0326652\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>High strength and lightweight are key trends in concrete development. Achieving a balance between these properties to produce high structural efficiency (strength-to-weight ratio) concrete is challenging due to the complex relationship between compressive strength and material components. In this study, two artificial neural network (ANN) models-the BP and Elman networks were used to predict the compressive strength of ultra-high-performance lightweight concrete (UHPLC), based on a robust database of 115 test datasets from previous studies. The investigated parameters included the cement grade (Grade 42.5 and Grade 52.5), cement content (352 kg/m3-938 kg/m3), silica fume content (0 kg/m3-350 kg/m3), fly ash content (0 kg/m3-220 kg/m3), microsphere content (0 kg/m3-624 kg/m3), lightweight sand types (pottery sand, expanded perlite sand, and expanded shale lightweight sand), lightweight sand content (0 kg/m3-769 kg/m3), sand type (quartz sand, river sand), sand content (0 kg/m3-1314 kg/m3), water (90 kg/m3-395 kg/m3), water reduce (0 kg/m3-42.8 kg/m3), steel fiber content (0 kg/m3-234 kg/m3). Correlation analysis and sensitive analysis indicated that lightweight sand content and sand content had the most significant effects on UHPLC compressive strength, followed by water content. Conversely, fly ash content and lightweight sand type had minimal impact. The developed ANN models for UHPLC compressive strength demonstrated high predictive accuracy for both training and testing datasets, which the RMSE of BP network and Elman network were 0.226 and 0.160, respectively, while R2 of both two developed models were more than 0.98. Additionally, UHPLC exhibited a higher compressive strength-to-density ratio than high-strength concrete, ultra-high-performance concrete, and even Q235 steel. Three strategies were proposed for creating ultra-high-performance lightweight composites: optimizing packing density and lowering the water-binder ratio, along with careful selection of lightweight aggregates.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PLoS ONE\",\"volume\":\"20 7\",\"pages\":\"e0326652\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12233282/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PLoS ONE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0326652\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS ONE","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0326652","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

高强轻量化是混凝土发展的主要趋势。由于抗压强度和材料成分之间的复杂关系,实现这些特性之间的平衡以产生高结构效率(强度重量比)的混凝土是具有挑战性的。在这项研究中,使用两个人工神经网络(ANN)模型- BP和Elman网络来预测超高性能轻质混凝土(UHPLC)的抗压强度,该模型基于来自先前研究的115个测试数据集的强大数据库。研究参数包括水泥等级(42.5级和52.5级)、水泥含量(352 kg/m3 ~ 938 kg/m3)、硅灰含量(0 kg/m3 ~ 350 kg/m3)、粉煤灰含量(0 kg/m3 ~ 220 kg/m3)、微球含量(0 kg/m3 ~ 624 kg/m3)、轻砂类型(陶砂、膨胀珍珠岩砂、膨胀页岩轻砂)、轻砂含量(0 kg/m3 ~ 769 kg/m3)、砂类型(石英砂、河砂)、砂含量(0 kg/m3 ~ 1314 kg/m3)、水(90 kg/m3 ~ 395 kg/m3)、减水量(0 kg/m3 ~ 42.8 kg/m3),钢纤维含量(0 kg/m3 ~ 234 kg/m3)。相关分析和敏感性分析表明,轻质砂含量和含砂量对UHPLC抗压强度的影响最为显著,含水量次之。相反,粉煤灰掺量和轻质砂类型的影响最小。所建立的UHPLC抗压强度人工神经网络模型对训练数据集和测试数据集的预测精度均较高,BP网络和Elman网络的RMSE分别为0.226和0.160,R2均大于0.98。此外,UHPLC的抗压强度密度比高于高强混凝土、超高性能混凝土,甚至高于Q235钢。研究人员提出了创造高性能轻质复合材料的三种策略:优化填料密度,降低水胶比,以及精心选择轻质骨料。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Estimation of compressive strength of ultra-high performance lightweight concrete (UHPLC) using neural network.

Estimation of compressive strength of ultra-high performance lightweight concrete (UHPLC) using neural network.

Estimation of compressive strength of ultra-high performance lightweight concrete (UHPLC) using neural network.

Estimation of compressive strength of ultra-high performance lightweight concrete (UHPLC) using neural network.

High strength and lightweight are key trends in concrete development. Achieving a balance between these properties to produce high structural efficiency (strength-to-weight ratio) concrete is challenging due to the complex relationship between compressive strength and material components. In this study, two artificial neural network (ANN) models-the BP and Elman networks were used to predict the compressive strength of ultra-high-performance lightweight concrete (UHPLC), based on a robust database of 115 test datasets from previous studies. The investigated parameters included the cement grade (Grade 42.5 and Grade 52.5), cement content (352 kg/m3-938 kg/m3), silica fume content (0 kg/m3-350 kg/m3), fly ash content (0 kg/m3-220 kg/m3), microsphere content (0 kg/m3-624 kg/m3), lightweight sand types (pottery sand, expanded perlite sand, and expanded shale lightweight sand), lightweight sand content (0 kg/m3-769 kg/m3), sand type (quartz sand, river sand), sand content (0 kg/m3-1314 kg/m3), water (90 kg/m3-395 kg/m3), water reduce (0 kg/m3-42.8 kg/m3), steel fiber content (0 kg/m3-234 kg/m3). Correlation analysis and sensitive analysis indicated that lightweight sand content and sand content had the most significant effects on UHPLC compressive strength, followed by water content. Conversely, fly ash content and lightweight sand type had minimal impact. The developed ANN models for UHPLC compressive strength demonstrated high predictive accuracy for both training and testing datasets, which the RMSE of BP network and Elman network were 0.226 and 0.160, respectively, while R2 of both two developed models were more than 0.98. Additionally, UHPLC exhibited a higher compressive strength-to-density ratio than high-strength concrete, ultra-high-performance concrete, and even Q235 steel. Three strategies were proposed for creating ultra-high-performance lightweight composites: optimizing packing density and lowering the water-binder ratio, along with careful selection of lightweight aggregates.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
PLoS ONE
PLoS ONE 生物-生物学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.40%
发文量
14242
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: PLOS ONE is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online publication. PLOS ONE welcomes reports on primary research from any scientific discipline. It provides: * Open-access—freely accessible online, authors retain copyright * Fast publication times * Peer review by expert, practicing researchers * Post-publication tools to indicate quality and impact * Community-based dialogue on articles * Worldwide media coverage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信