Muhammed Shabil, Ajay Malvi, Mahalaqua Nazli Khatib, Subbulakshmi Ganesan, Mandeep Kaur, Manish Srivastava, G V Siva Prasad, Pranchal Rajput, Brijendra Mohan, Diptismitha Jena, Ganesh Bushi, Sanjit Sah, Prakasini Satapathy, Shailesh Kumar Samal, Edward Mawejje
{"title":"电子烟使用与慢性阻塞性肺病风险的关联:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Muhammed Shabil, Ajay Malvi, Mahalaqua Nazli Khatib, Subbulakshmi Ganesan, Mandeep Kaur, Manish Srivastava, G V Siva Prasad, Pranchal Rajput, Brijendra Mohan, Diptismitha Jena, Ganesh Bushi, Sanjit Sah, Prakasini Satapathy, Shailesh Kumar Samal, Edward Mawejje","doi":"10.1038/s41533-025-00438-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is a global health concern, primarily linked to cigarette smoking. The potential role of electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) in COPD development remains unclear. Despite growing popularity as a smoking alternative, evidence suggests e-cigarettes may have harmful respiratory effects. This systematic review and meta-analysis assess the relationship between e-cigarette use and odds of having COPD. A comprehensive search of Web of Science, Embase, and PubMed was conducted to identify observational studies that assessed the association between e-cigarette use and the risk of COPD, providing risk estimates (hazard ratios, risk ratios, or odds ratios) for current, former, and ever e-cigarette users. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed using R software (V 4.4), and heterogeneity was assessed with the I<sup>2</sup> statistic. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to test the robustness of the findings. Publication bias was evaluated using Egger's test and funnel plots. Seventeen studies (1087 records screened) were included. E-cigarette use was associated with significantly higher odds of COPD compared to non-use. The pooled odds ratios were 1.48 (95% CI: 1.36-1.61) for current users, 1.84 (95% CI: 1.51-2.23) for former users, and 1.79 (95% CI: 1.42-2.25) for ever users. Sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of the findings. E-cigarette use is associated with higher odds of having COPD. Public health efforts should consider raising awareness of the potential respiratory risks associated with e-cigarette use.</p>","PeriodicalId":19470,"journal":{"name":"NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine","volume":"35 1","pages":"31"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12234726/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association of electronic cigarette use and risk of COPD: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Muhammed Shabil, Ajay Malvi, Mahalaqua Nazli Khatib, Subbulakshmi Ganesan, Mandeep Kaur, Manish Srivastava, G V Siva Prasad, Pranchal Rajput, Brijendra Mohan, Diptismitha Jena, Ganesh Bushi, Sanjit Sah, Prakasini Satapathy, Shailesh Kumar Samal, Edward Mawejje\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41533-025-00438-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is a global health concern, primarily linked to cigarette smoking. The potential role of electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) in COPD development remains unclear. Despite growing popularity as a smoking alternative, evidence suggests e-cigarettes may have harmful respiratory effects. This systematic review and meta-analysis assess the relationship between e-cigarette use and odds of having COPD. A comprehensive search of Web of Science, Embase, and PubMed was conducted to identify observational studies that assessed the association between e-cigarette use and the risk of COPD, providing risk estimates (hazard ratios, risk ratios, or odds ratios) for current, former, and ever e-cigarette users. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed using R software (V 4.4), and heterogeneity was assessed with the I<sup>2</sup> statistic. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to test the robustness of the findings. Publication bias was evaluated using Egger's test and funnel plots. Seventeen studies (1087 records screened) were included. E-cigarette use was associated with significantly higher odds of COPD compared to non-use. The pooled odds ratios were 1.48 (95% CI: 1.36-1.61) for current users, 1.84 (95% CI: 1.51-2.23) for former users, and 1.79 (95% CI: 1.42-2.25) for ever users. Sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of the findings. E-cigarette use is associated with higher odds of having COPD. Public health efforts should consider raising awareness of the potential respiratory risks associated with e-cigarette use.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19470,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"31\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12234726/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41533-025-00438-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41533-025-00438-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Association of electronic cigarette use and risk of COPD: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is a global health concern, primarily linked to cigarette smoking. The potential role of electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) in COPD development remains unclear. Despite growing popularity as a smoking alternative, evidence suggests e-cigarettes may have harmful respiratory effects. This systematic review and meta-analysis assess the relationship between e-cigarette use and odds of having COPD. A comprehensive search of Web of Science, Embase, and PubMed was conducted to identify observational studies that assessed the association between e-cigarette use and the risk of COPD, providing risk estimates (hazard ratios, risk ratios, or odds ratios) for current, former, and ever e-cigarette users. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed using R software (V 4.4), and heterogeneity was assessed with the I2 statistic. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to test the robustness of the findings. Publication bias was evaluated using Egger's test and funnel plots. Seventeen studies (1087 records screened) were included. E-cigarette use was associated with significantly higher odds of COPD compared to non-use. The pooled odds ratios were 1.48 (95% CI: 1.36-1.61) for current users, 1.84 (95% CI: 1.51-2.23) for former users, and 1.79 (95% CI: 1.42-2.25) for ever users. Sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of the findings. E-cigarette use is associated with higher odds of having COPD. Public health efforts should consider raising awareness of the potential respiratory risks associated with e-cigarette use.
期刊介绍:
npj Primary Care Respiratory Medicine is an open access, online-only, multidisciplinary journal dedicated to publishing high-quality research in all areas of the primary care management of respiratory and respiratory-related allergic diseases. Papers published by the journal represent important advances of significance to specialists within the fields of primary care and respiratory medicine. We are particularly interested in receiving papers in relation to the following aspects of respiratory medicine, respiratory-related allergic diseases and tobacco control:
epidemiology
prevention
clinical care
service delivery and organisation of healthcare (including implementation science)
global health.