{"title":"阿特唑单抗加贝伐单抗治疗不可切除肝细胞癌期间中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比率预测长期治疗效果:一项多中心分析。","authors":"Ryo Sato, Takanori Suzuki, Kentaro Matsuura, Daisuke Kato, Katsumi Hayashi, Kohei Okayama, Fumihiro Okumura, Satoshi Sobue, Atsunori Kusakabe, Izumi Hasegawa, Kiyoto Narita, Tsutomu Mizoshita, Yoshihide Kimura, Hiromu Kondo, Hisayo Kojima, Kazuki Hayashi, Atsushi Ozasa, Hayato Kawamura, Kei Fujiwara, Shunsuke Nojiri, Hiromi Kataoka","doi":"10.1159/000547264","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (ATZ/BEV) is used for the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (u-HCC). However, there are few reports investigating the predictors of whether or not disease control can be achieved for long periods.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We enrolled 106 u-HCC patients who were treated with ATZ/BEV as the first-line systemic chemotherapy and were evaluated as non-progressive disease (non-PD) in their initial assessments. They were divided into two groups: patients who had achieved disease control (non-PD) for more than 6 months, Group-L, and patients who had progressed (PD) within 6 months, Group-S. We investigated the predictors of long-term therapeutic efficacy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients in Group-L had significantly lower neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratios (NLR) (the ratios of NLR at the start of the second course of ATZ/BEV to their pretreatment levels) than Group-S (P = 0.044), and the optimal cut-off value was 1.129. The patients with an NLR ratio <1.129 had longer progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) than those with an NLR ratio ≥1.129 (median: 16 vs. 6 months, P = 0.016 for PFS; not reached vs. 22 months, P = 0.007 for OS). Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that an NLR ratio ≥1.129 was an independent predictor for unfavorable PFS and OS (hazard ratio [HR] 2.03, P = 0.022 for PFS; HR 2.37, P = 0.019 for OS).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In u-HCC patients treated with ATZ/BEV, a lower NLR ratio was associated with a durable response, which led to favorable PFS and OS.</p>","PeriodicalId":19497,"journal":{"name":"Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"1-22"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio during Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab Therapy for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma Predicts Long-term Therapeutic Efficacy: A Multicenter Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Ryo Sato, Takanori Suzuki, Kentaro Matsuura, Daisuke Kato, Katsumi Hayashi, Kohei Okayama, Fumihiro Okumura, Satoshi Sobue, Atsunori Kusakabe, Izumi Hasegawa, Kiyoto Narita, Tsutomu Mizoshita, Yoshihide Kimura, Hiromu Kondo, Hisayo Kojima, Kazuki Hayashi, Atsushi Ozasa, Hayato Kawamura, Kei Fujiwara, Shunsuke Nojiri, Hiromi Kataoka\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000547264\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (ATZ/BEV) is used for the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (u-HCC). However, there are few reports investigating the predictors of whether or not disease control can be achieved for long periods.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We enrolled 106 u-HCC patients who were treated with ATZ/BEV as the first-line systemic chemotherapy and were evaluated as non-progressive disease (non-PD) in their initial assessments. They were divided into two groups: patients who had achieved disease control (non-PD) for more than 6 months, Group-L, and patients who had progressed (PD) within 6 months, Group-S. We investigated the predictors of long-term therapeutic efficacy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients in Group-L had significantly lower neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratios (NLR) (the ratios of NLR at the start of the second course of ATZ/BEV to their pretreatment levels) than Group-S (P = 0.044), and the optimal cut-off value was 1.129. The patients with an NLR ratio <1.129 had longer progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) than those with an NLR ratio ≥1.129 (median: 16 vs. 6 months, P = 0.016 for PFS; not reached vs. 22 months, P = 0.007 for OS). Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that an NLR ratio ≥1.129 was an independent predictor for unfavorable PFS and OS (hazard ratio [HR] 2.03, P = 0.022 for PFS; HR 2.37, P = 0.019 for OS).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In u-HCC patients treated with ATZ/BEV, a lower NLR ratio was associated with a durable response, which led to favorable PFS and OS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19497,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-22\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000547264\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000547264","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio during Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab Therapy for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma Predicts Long-term Therapeutic Efficacy: A Multicenter Analysis.
Introduction: Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (ATZ/BEV) is used for the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (u-HCC). However, there are few reports investigating the predictors of whether or not disease control can be achieved for long periods.
Methods: We enrolled 106 u-HCC patients who were treated with ATZ/BEV as the first-line systemic chemotherapy and were evaluated as non-progressive disease (non-PD) in their initial assessments. They were divided into two groups: patients who had achieved disease control (non-PD) for more than 6 months, Group-L, and patients who had progressed (PD) within 6 months, Group-S. We investigated the predictors of long-term therapeutic efficacy.
Results: Patients in Group-L had significantly lower neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratios (NLR) (the ratios of NLR at the start of the second course of ATZ/BEV to their pretreatment levels) than Group-S (P = 0.044), and the optimal cut-off value was 1.129. The patients with an NLR ratio <1.129 had longer progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) than those with an NLR ratio ≥1.129 (median: 16 vs. 6 months, P = 0.016 for PFS; not reached vs. 22 months, P = 0.007 for OS). Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that an NLR ratio ≥1.129 was an independent predictor for unfavorable PFS and OS (hazard ratio [HR] 2.03, P = 0.022 for PFS; HR 2.37, P = 0.019 for OS).
Conclusions: In u-HCC patients treated with ATZ/BEV, a lower NLR ratio was associated with a durable response, which led to favorable PFS and OS.
期刊介绍:
Although laboratory and clinical cancer research need to be closely linked, observations at the basic level often remain removed from medical applications. This journal works to accelerate the translation of experimental results into the clinic, and back again into the laboratory for further investigation. The fundamental purpose of this effort is to advance clinically-relevant knowledge of cancer, and improve the outcome of prevention, diagnosis and treatment of malignant disease. The journal publishes significant clinical studies from cancer programs around the world, along with important translational laboratory findings, mini-reviews (invited and submitted) and in-depth discussions of evolving and controversial topics in the oncology arena. A unique feature of the journal is a new section which focuses on rapid peer-review and subsequent publication of short reports of phase 1 and phase 2 clinical cancer trials, with a goal of insuring that high-quality clinical cancer research quickly enters the public domain, regardless of the trial’s ultimate conclusions regarding efficacy or toxicity.