芝加哥分类4.0版食管测压的实际应用:亚洲多中心研究。

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Soo In Choi, Jong Wook Kim, Kee Wook Jung, Boram Cha, Ga Hee Kim, Myeongsook Seo, Han Hee Lee, Ju Yup Lee, Seung Young Kim, Seon-Young Park, Yu Kyung Cho, Chong Il Sohn, Suck Chei Choi
{"title":"芝加哥分类4.0版食管测压的实际应用:亚洲多中心研究。","authors":"Soo In Choi, Jong Wook Kim, Kee Wook Jung, Boram Cha, Ga Hee Kim, Myeongsook Seo, Han Hee Lee, Ju Yup Lee, Seung Young Kim, Seon-Young Park, Yu Kyung Cho, Chong Il Sohn, Suck Chei Choi","doi":"10.5056/jnm25010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aims: </strong>The Chicago classification version 4.0 (CC v4.0) proposes a standardized high-resolution manometry protocol for more sophisticated diagnosis of esophageal motility disorders. We aim to investigate the real-world application of CC v4.0 through multi-institutional surveys in Asian countries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We requested a total of 161 questionnaires from members of the Asian Neurogastroenterology and Motility Association via Google Survey from March to June 2023. The questionnaire assessed CC v4.0 protocol compliance and diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Responses were received from 33 centers in 9 countries (18 in Korea, 5 in Japan, and 10 in others). Among these, anticholinergics were investigated in 14 centers (42.4%), and narcotic drugs in 16 centers (48.5%). Eight centers (24.2%) fully adhered to CC v4.0 protocol for single wet swallows and provocation tests. Nine centers (27.3%) had an adaptation period < 60 seconds, 13 centers (39.4%) had < 3 breath counts, and 15 centers (45.5%) had swallowing intervals < 30 seconds (42.4% had 10-29 seconds and 3% had < 10 seconds). Twenty-four centers (72.7%) started the examination in a supine position and 13 centers (39.4%) did not change their position. Among 27 centers (81.8%) applying provocation tests, all applied multiple rapid swallows, whereas rapid drink challenge was applied in 19 (57.6%). Timed barium esophagography and functional lumen imaging probe were available in 16 (48.5%) and 6 centers (18.2%), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We observed heterogeneity among centers in the application of CC v4.0 protocol. To increase inter-center reliability and minimize diagnostic ambiguity, efforts should continue toward the practical clinical application of standard protocols.</p>","PeriodicalId":16543,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility","volume":"31 3","pages":"357-365"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12241918/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Real-world Application of the Chicago Classification Version 4.0 for Esophageal Manometry: Asian Multicenter Study.\",\"authors\":\"Soo In Choi, Jong Wook Kim, Kee Wook Jung, Boram Cha, Ga Hee Kim, Myeongsook Seo, Han Hee Lee, Ju Yup Lee, Seung Young Kim, Seon-Young Park, Yu Kyung Cho, Chong Il Sohn, Suck Chei Choi\",\"doi\":\"10.5056/jnm25010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background/aims: </strong>The Chicago classification version 4.0 (CC v4.0) proposes a standardized high-resolution manometry protocol for more sophisticated diagnosis of esophageal motility disorders. We aim to investigate the real-world application of CC v4.0 through multi-institutional surveys in Asian countries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We requested a total of 161 questionnaires from members of the Asian Neurogastroenterology and Motility Association via Google Survey from March to June 2023. The questionnaire assessed CC v4.0 protocol compliance and diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Responses were received from 33 centers in 9 countries (18 in Korea, 5 in Japan, and 10 in others). Among these, anticholinergics were investigated in 14 centers (42.4%), and narcotic drugs in 16 centers (48.5%). Eight centers (24.2%) fully adhered to CC v4.0 protocol for single wet swallows and provocation tests. Nine centers (27.3%) had an adaptation period < 60 seconds, 13 centers (39.4%) had < 3 breath counts, and 15 centers (45.5%) had swallowing intervals < 30 seconds (42.4% had 10-29 seconds and 3% had < 10 seconds). Twenty-four centers (72.7%) started the examination in a supine position and 13 centers (39.4%) did not change their position. Among 27 centers (81.8%) applying provocation tests, all applied multiple rapid swallows, whereas rapid drink challenge was applied in 19 (57.6%). Timed barium esophagography and functional lumen imaging probe were available in 16 (48.5%) and 6 centers (18.2%), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We observed heterogeneity among centers in the application of CC v4.0 protocol. To increase inter-center reliability and minimize diagnostic ambiguity, efforts should continue toward the practical clinical application of standard protocols.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16543,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility\",\"volume\":\"31 3\",\"pages\":\"357-365\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12241918/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5056/jnm25010\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5056/jnm25010","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的:芝加哥分类4.0版(CC v4.0)提出了一个标准化的高分辨率测压方案,用于更复杂的食管运动障碍诊断。我们的目标是通过在亚洲国家的多机构调查来调查CC v4.0的实际应用。方法:我们于2023年3月至6月通过谷歌调查向亚洲神经胃肠病学和运动协会会员索要共计161份问卷。问卷评估CC v4.0协议的依从性和诊断。结果:在韩国18个、日本5个、其他国家10个等9个国家的33个中心进行了问卷调查。其中,抗胆碱能类药物调查14个中心(42.4%),麻醉药品调查16个中心(48.5%)。8个中心(24.2%)完全遵循CC v4.0方案进行单次湿咽试验和激发试验。9个中心(27.3%)的适应期< 60秒,13个中心(39.4%)的呼吸计数< 3次,15个中心(45.5%)的吞咽间隔< 30秒(42.4%为10-29秒,3%为< 10秒)。24个中心(72.7%)以仰卧位开始检查,13个中心(39.4%)未改变体位。27个中心(81.8%)采用激发试验,均采用多次快速吞咽法,19个中心采用快速饮水法,占57.6%。16个中心(48.5%)和6个中心(18.2%)分别进行了定时钡食管造影和功能性管腔成像探头检查。结论:我们观察到各中心在CC v4.0协议应用方面存在异质性。为了提高中心间的可靠性和减少诊断的模糊性,应继续努力实现标准方案的实际临床应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Real-world Application of the Chicago Classification Version 4.0 for Esophageal Manometry: Asian Multicenter Study.

Real-world Application of the Chicago Classification Version 4.0 for Esophageal Manometry: Asian Multicenter Study.

Real-world Application of the Chicago Classification Version 4.0 for Esophageal Manometry: Asian Multicenter Study.

Background/aims: The Chicago classification version 4.0 (CC v4.0) proposes a standardized high-resolution manometry protocol for more sophisticated diagnosis of esophageal motility disorders. We aim to investigate the real-world application of CC v4.0 through multi-institutional surveys in Asian countries.

Methods: We requested a total of 161 questionnaires from members of the Asian Neurogastroenterology and Motility Association via Google Survey from March to June 2023. The questionnaire assessed CC v4.0 protocol compliance and diagnosis.

Results: Responses were received from 33 centers in 9 countries (18 in Korea, 5 in Japan, and 10 in others). Among these, anticholinergics were investigated in 14 centers (42.4%), and narcotic drugs in 16 centers (48.5%). Eight centers (24.2%) fully adhered to CC v4.0 protocol for single wet swallows and provocation tests. Nine centers (27.3%) had an adaptation period < 60 seconds, 13 centers (39.4%) had < 3 breath counts, and 15 centers (45.5%) had swallowing intervals < 30 seconds (42.4% had 10-29 seconds and 3% had < 10 seconds). Twenty-four centers (72.7%) started the examination in a supine position and 13 centers (39.4%) did not change their position. Among 27 centers (81.8%) applying provocation tests, all applied multiple rapid swallows, whereas rapid drink challenge was applied in 19 (57.6%). Timed barium esophagography and functional lumen imaging probe were available in 16 (48.5%) and 6 centers (18.2%), respectively.

Conclusions: We observed heterogeneity among centers in the application of CC v4.0 protocol. To increase inter-center reliability and minimize diagnostic ambiguity, efforts should continue toward the practical clinical application of standard protocols.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility
Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
8.80%
发文量
96
期刊介绍: Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility (J Neurogastroenterol Motil) is a joint official journal of the Korean Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility, the Thai Neurogastroenterology and Motility Society, the Japanese Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility, the Indian Motility and Functional Disease Association, the Chinese Society of Gastrointestinal Motility, the South East Asia Gastro-Neuro Motility Association, the Taiwan Neurogastroenterology and Motility Society and the Asian Neurogastroenterology and Motility Association, launched in January 2010 after the title change from the Korean Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility, published from 1994 to 2009.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信