Eli Neimark, Ron Eremenko, Sharon Braudo, Olga Reitblat, Guy Kleinmann
{"title":"ACD、LT和WTW在使用Barrett Universal II、Kane和Hill-RBF 3.0公式预测术后屈光中的重要性","authors":"Eli Neimark, Ron Eremenko, Sharon Braudo, Olga Reitblat, Guy Kleinmann","doi":"10.3928/1081597X-20250520-03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the importance of the anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT), and white-to-white distance (WTW) in predicting the final postoperative refraction using modern formulas.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective study of 140 consecutive eyes that underwent cataract surgery at the Department of Ophthalmology, Edith Wolfson Medical Centre, Holon, Israel. The Barrett Universal II (BUII), Kane, and Hill-RBF 3.0 formulas were calculated for each eye with all combinations of omitting ACD, LT, and WTW, as possible by each formula. Lens constant optimizations were executed. The results were compared to the postoperative refraction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For the BUII formula, the ACD only variation exhibited a statistically significant increase in mean absolute deviation (MAD) (0.024 diopters [D], <i>P</i> = .010) and standard deviation of prediction error (SD-PE) (0.022, <i>P</i> = .002) compared with BUII using all parameters, whereas no other variations showed statistically significant differences in MAD or SD-PE. For the Hill-RBF 3.0 formula, both the ACD only (0.012 D, <i>P</i> < .001) and ACD+WTW (0.009 D, <i>P</i> = .016) variations demonstrated a statistically significant increase in MAD, although no statistically significant differences were observed in SD-PE. For the Kane formula, excluding the LT parameter resulted in a statistically significant increase in MAD (0.020 D, <i>P</i> = .034), whereas the increase in SD-PE (0.020, <i>P</i> = .266) was not statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The BUII, Kane, and Hill-RBF 3.0 formulas demonstrated statistically significant, but not clinically meaningful, differences in SD-PE and MAD when ACD, LT, and WTW were excluded in normal biometric eyes. Further research involving eyes with atypical biometric characteristics is warranted to enhance refractive accuracy and minimize outliers. <b>[<i>J Refract Surg</i>. 2025;41(7):e662-e666.]</b>.</p>","PeriodicalId":16951,"journal":{"name":"Journal of refractive surgery","volume":"41 7","pages":"e662-e666"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Importance of ACD, LT, and WTW in Predicting Postoperative Refraction Using the Barrett Universal II, Kane, and Hill-RBF 3.0 Formulas.\",\"authors\":\"Eli Neimark, Ron Eremenko, Sharon Braudo, Olga Reitblat, Guy Kleinmann\",\"doi\":\"10.3928/1081597X-20250520-03\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the importance of the anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT), and white-to-white distance (WTW) in predicting the final postoperative refraction using modern formulas.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective study of 140 consecutive eyes that underwent cataract surgery at the Department of Ophthalmology, Edith Wolfson Medical Centre, Holon, Israel. The Barrett Universal II (BUII), Kane, and Hill-RBF 3.0 formulas were calculated for each eye with all combinations of omitting ACD, LT, and WTW, as possible by each formula. Lens constant optimizations were executed. The results were compared to the postoperative refraction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For the BUII formula, the ACD only variation exhibited a statistically significant increase in mean absolute deviation (MAD) (0.024 diopters [D], <i>P</i> = .010) and standard deviation of prediction error (SD-PE) (0.022, <i>P</i> = .002) compared with BUII using all parameters, whereas no other variations showed statistically significant differences in MAD or SD-PE. For the Hill-RBF 3.0 formula, both the ACD only (0.012 D, <i>P</i> < .001) and ACD+WTW (0.009 D, <i>P</i> = .016) variations demonstrated a statistically significant increase in MAD, although no statistically significant differences were observed in SD-PE. For the Kane formula, excluding the LT parameter resulted in a statistically significant increase in MAD (0.020 D, <i>P</i> = .034), whereas the increase in SD-PE (0.020, <i>P</i> = .266) was not statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The BUII, Kane, and Hill-RBF 3.0 formulas demonstrated statistically significant, but not clinically meaningful, differences in SD-PE and MAD when ACD, LT, and WTW were excluded in normal biometric eyes. Further research involving eyes with atypical biometric characteristics is warranted to enhance refractive accuracy and minimize outliers. <b>[<i>J Refract Surg</i>. 2025;41(7):e662-e666.]</b>.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16951,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of refractive surgery\",\"volume\":\"41 7\",\"pages\":\"e662-e666\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of refractive surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20250520-03\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of refractive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20250520-03","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:利用现代公式评估前房深度(ACD)、晶状体厚度(LT)和白到白距离(WTW)在预测术后最终屈光度中的重要性。方法:对以色列Holon市伊迪丝沃尔夫森医疗中心眼科接受白内障手术的140只连续眼睛进行回顾性研究。计算每只眼睛的Barrett Universal II (BUII)、Kane和Hill-RBF 3.0公式,并尽可能省略ACD、LT和WTW的所有组合。镜头常数优化执行。将结果与术后屈光度进行比较。结果:对于BUII公式,仅ACD的变异在所有参数下的平均绝对偏差(MAD)(0.024屈光度[D], P = 0.010)和预测误差标准差(SD-PE) (0.022, P = 0.002)均较BUII有统计学意义的增加,而其他变异在MAD和SD-PE方面无统计学意义的差异。对于Hill-RBF 3.0公式,仅ACD (0.012 D, P < .001)和ACD+WTW (0.009 D, P = .016)变化均显示MAD增加具有统计学意义,而SD-PE差异无统计学意义。在Kane公式中,剔除LT参数后,MAD升高有统计学意义(0.020 D, P = 0.034), SD-PE升高无统计学意义(0.020,P = 0.266)。结论:BUII、Kane和Hill-RBF 3.0公式在排除ACD、LT和WTW后,在正常生物特征眼中SD-PE和MAD的差异具有统计学意义,但无临床意义。有必要进一步研究具有非典型生物特征的眼睛,以提高屈光精度和减少异常值。[J].中华眼科杂志,2015;41(7):662- 666。
The Importance of ACD, LT, and WTW in Predicting Postoperative Refraction Using the Barrett Universal II, Kane, and Hill-RBF 3.0 Formulas.
Purpose: To evaluate the importance of the anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT), and white-to-white distance (WTW) in predicting the final postoperative refraction using modern formulas.
Methods: This was a retrospective study of 140 consecutive eyes that underwent cataract surgery at the Department of Ophthalmology, Edith Wolfson Medical Centre, Holon, Israel. The Barrett Universal II (BUII), Kane, and Hill-RBF 3.0 formulas were calculated for each eye with all combinations of omitting ACD, LT, and WTW, as possible by each formula. Lens constant optimizations were executed. The results were compared to the postoperative refraction.
Results: For the BUII formula, the ACD only variation exhibited a statistically significant increase in mean absolute deviation (MAD) (0.024 diopters [D], P = .010) and standard deviation of prediction error (SD-PE) (0.022, P = .002) compared with BUII using all parameters, whereas no other variations showed statistically significant differences in MAD or SD-PE. For the Hill-RBF 3.0 formula, both the ACD only (0.012 D, P < .001) and ACD+WTW (0.009 D, P = .016) variations demonstrated a statistically significant increase in MAD, although no statistically significant differences were observed in SD-PE. For the Kane formula, excluding the LT parameter resulted in a statistically significant increase in MAD (0.020 D, P = .034), whereas the increase in SD-PE (0.020, P = .266) was not statistically significant.
Conclusions: The BUII, Kane, and Hill-RBF 3.0 formulas demonstrated statistically significant, but not clinically meaningful, differences in SD-PE and MAD when ACD, LT, and WTW were excluded in normal biometric eyes. Further research involving eyes with atypical biometric characteristics is warranted to enhance refractive accuracy and minimize outliers. [J Refract Surg. 2025;41(7):e662-e666.].
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Refractive Surgery, the official journal of the International Society of Refractive Surgery, a partner of the American Academy of Ophthalmology, has been a monthly peer-reviewed forum for original research, review, and evaluation of refractive and lens-based surgical procedures for more than 30 years. Practical, clinically valuable articles provide readers with the most up-to-date information regarding advances in the field of refractive surgery. Begin to explore the Journal and all of its great benefits such as:
• Columns including “Translational Science,” “Surgical Techniques,” and “Biomechanics”
• Supplemental videos and materials available for many articles
• Access to current articles, as well as several years of archived content
• Articles posted online just 2 months after acceptance.