Soyoung Ryu, David S Y Kang, Kang Yoon Kim, Samuel Arba-Mosquera, Byunghoon Chung, Ikhyun Jun, Ahmed Elsheikh, Kyoung Yul Seo, Tae-Im Kim
{"title":"优化等离子体形成和最小化微空化以提高角膜屈光透镜提取的临床效果。","authors":"Soyoung Ryu, David S Y Kang, Kang Yoon Kim, Samuel Arba-Mosquera, Byunghoon Chung, Ikhyun Jun, Ahmed Elsheikh, Kyoung Yul Seo, Tae-Im Kim","doi":"10.3928/1081597X-20250509-05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare early postoperative visual outcomes and higher order aberrations (HOAs) between plasma and conventional keratorefractive lenticular extractions (P-KLEx and C-KLEx).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective case series, records of patients who underwent KLEx surgery using two protocols-C-KLEx (symmetric spot/track distance laser spacing, 100-nJ pulse energy, VisuMax 500; Carl Zeiss Meditec) or P-KLEx (asymmetric spot/track distance laser spacing, 85-nJ pulse energy, VisuMax 800; Carl Zeiss Meditec)-were reviewed. Both groups received an identical total energy dosage of 625 mJ/cm<sup>2</sup>. Postoperative visual acuity and corneal higher order aberrations (HOAs) were analyzed at 1 day, 2 weeks, and 2 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 281 eyes, 136 and 145 were included in the C-KLEx and P-KLEx groups, respectively. At postoperative day 1, the mean uncorrected distance visual acuities (UDVAs) were 0.02 ± 0.04 and 0.01 ± 0.08 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) in the C-KLEx and P-KLEx groups, respectively (<i>P</i> = .22); however, the P-KLEx group demonstrated significantly better mean UDVA at 2 weeks and 2 months postoperatively (both <i>P</i> < .05). At 2 weeks postoperatively, the mean UDVAs were -0.01 ± 0.04 and -0.04 ± 0.07 logMAR in the C-KLEx and P-KLEx groups, respectively, and at 2 months postoperatively, the mean UDVAs were -0.02 ± 0.04 and -0.04 ± 0.06 logMAR, respectively. The P-KLEx group showed less induction of total HOAs, coma, and spherical aberration than the C-KLEx group (all <i>P</i> < .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>P-KLEx, which minimizes microcavitation and creates a lenticule with near-pure plasma, shows more favorable outcomes than C-KLEx, yielding better early postoperative visual acuities and reduced induction of corneal HOAs. <b>[<i>J Refract Surg</i>. 2025;41(7):e635-e644.]</b>.</p>","PeriodicalId":16951,"journal":{"name":"Journal of refractive surgery","volume":"41 7","pages":"e635-e644"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimizing Plasma Formation and Minimizing Microcavitation to Enhance Clinical Outcomes in Keratorefractive Lenticule Extraction.\",\"authors\":\"Soyoung Ryu, David S Y Kang, Kang Yoon Kim, Samuel Arba-Mosquera, Byunghoon Chung, Ikhyun Jun, Ahmed Elsheikh, Kyoung Yul Seo, Tae-Im Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.3928/1081597X-20250509-05\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare early postoperative visual outcomes and higher order aberrations (HOAs) between plasma and conventional keratorefractive lenticular extractions (P-KLEx and C-KLEx).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective case series, records of patients who underwent KLEx surgery using two protocols-C-KLEx (symmetric spot/track distance laser spacing, 100-nJ pulse energy, VisuMax 500; Carl Zeiss Meditec) or P-KLEx (asymmetric spot/track distance laser spacing, 85-nJ pulse energy, VisuMax 800; Carl Zeiss Meditec)-were reviewed. Both groups received an identical total energy dosage of 625 mJ/cm<sup>2</sup>. Postoperative visual acuity and corneal higher order aberrations (HOAs) were analyzed at 1 day, 2 weeks, and 2 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 281 eyes, 136 and 145 were included in the C-KLEx and P-KLEx groups, respectively. At postoperative day 1, the mean uncorrected distance visual acuities (UDVAs) were 0.02 ± 0.04 and 0.01 ± 0.08 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) in the C-KLEx and P-KLEx groups, respectively (<i>P</i> = .22); however, the P-KLEx group demonstrated significantly better mean UDVA at 2 weeks and 2 months postoperatively (both <i>P</i> < .05). At 2 weeks postoperatively, the mean UDVAs were -0.01 ± 0.04 and -0.04 ± 0.07 logMAR in the C-KLEx and P-KLEx groups, respectively, and at 2 months postoperatively, the mean UDVAs were -0.02 ± 0.04 and -0.04 ± 0.06 logMAR, respectively. The P-KLEx group showed less induction of total HOAs, coma, and spherical aberration than the C-KLEx group (all <i>P</i> < .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>P-KLEx, which minimizes microcavitation and creates a lenticule with near-pure plasma, shows more favorable outcomes than C-KLEx, yielding better early postoperative visual acuities and reduced induction of corneal HOAs. <b>[<i>J Refract Surg</i>. 2025;41(7):e635-e644.]</b>.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16951,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of refractive surgery\",\"volume\":\"41 7\",\"pages\":\"e635-e644\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of refractive surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20250509-05\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of refractive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20250509-05","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Optimizing Plasma Formation and Minimizing Microcavitation to Enhance Clinical Outcomes in Keratorefractive Lenticule Extraction.
Purpose: To compare early postoperative visual outcomes and higher order aberrations (HOAs) between plasma and conventional keratorefractive lenticular extractions (P-KLEx and C-KLEx).
Methods: In this retrospective case series, records of patients who underwent KLEx surgery using two protocols-C-KLEx (symmetric spot/track distance laser spacing, 100-nJ pulse energy, VisuMax 500; Carl Zeiss Meditec) or P-KLEx (asymmetric spot/track distance laser spacing, 85-nJ pulse energy, VisuMax 800; Carl Zeiss Meditec)-were reviewed. Both groups received an identical total energy dosage of 625 mJ/cm2. Postoperative visual acuity and corneal higher order aberrations (HOAs) were analyzed at 1 day, 2 weeks, and 2 months.
Results: Among 281 eyes, 136 and 145 were included in the C-KLEx and P-KLEx groups, respectively. At postoperative day 1, the mean uncorrected distance visual acuities (UDVAs) were 0.02 ± 0.04 and 0.01 ± 0.08 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) in the C-KLEx and P-KLEx groups, respectively (P = .22); however, the P-KLEx group demonstrated significantly better mean UDVA at 2 weeks and 2 months postoperatively (both P < .05). At 2 weeks postoperatively, the mean UDVAs were -0.01 ± 0.04 and -0.04 ± 0.07 logMAR in the C-KLEx and P-KLEx groups, respectively, and at 2 months postoperatively, the mean UDVAs were -0.02 ± 0.04 and -0.04 ± 0.06 logMAR, respectively. The P-KLEx group showed less induction of total HOAs, coma, and spherical aberration than the C-KLEx group (all P < .05).
Conclusions: P-KLEx, which minimizes microcavitation and creates a lenticule with near-pure plasma, shows more favorable outcomes than C-KLEx, yielding better early postoperative visual acuities and reduced induction of corneal HOAs. [J Refract Surg. 2025;41(7):e635-e644.].
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Refractive Surgery, the official journal of the International Society of Refractive Surgery, a partner of the American Academy of Ophthalmology, has been a monthly peer-reviewed forum for original research, review, and evaluation of refractive and lens-based surgical procedures for more than 30 years. Practical, clinically valuable articles provide readers with the most up-to-date information regarding advances in the field of refractive surgery. Begin to explore the Journal and all of its great benefits such as:
• Columns including “Translational Science,” “Surgical Techniques,” and “Biomechanics”
• Supplemental videos and materials available for many articles
• Access to current articles, as well as several years of archived content
• Articles posted online just 2 months after acceptance.