G W Reicks, D E Clay, S A Clay, D R Joshi, J Moriles-Miller, S Westhoff, S A Bruggeman
{"title":"晚春施尿素增加了二氧化碳当量的表观排放量,而秋夏施尿素则没有增加。","authors":"G W Reicks, D E Clay, S A Clay, D R Joshi, J Moriles-Miller, S Westhoff, S A Bruggeman","doi":"10.1002/jeq2.70050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Synchronizing nitrogen (N) fertilizer application with plant N uptake, as opposed to applying earlier, is believed to improve N use efficiency while simultaneously reducing nitrate leaching, ammonia volatilization, and greenhouse gas emissions. However, little research has been conducted to confirm that this is true. Therefore, this study's objective was to determine the effect of urea application date (early fall, mid-fall, late fall, late spring, early summer, and midsummer) and rate (0 and 224 kg N ha<sup>-1</sup>) on the apparent carbon dioxide equivalence (CO<sub>2ea</sub>). This completely randomized field experiment was conducted six times (dates) where each treatment was replicated four times. Soil temperature and moisture along with greenhouse gases (N<sub>2</sub>O, CO<sub>2</sub>, and CH<sub>4</sub>,) were measured every 4 h for 21 days at Aurora, SD, in 2017 and 2018. N<sub>2</sub>O and CH<sub>4</sub> were expressed in carbon dioxide equivalence, and all three gases were summed to CO<sub>2ea</sub>. Delaying the fertilizer from early to late fall decreased CO<sub>2ea</sub> from 69,375 to 18,420 g CO<sub>2ea</sub> (ha × day)<sup>-1</sup>. During late spring through midsummer, CO<sub>2ea</sub> were similar for the three application dates and averaged 101,500 g CO<sub>2ea</sub> (ha × day)<sup>-1</sup>. This study showed that the lowest CO<sub>2ea</sub> values for the 3 weeks following the application were associated with applying urea in the fall after the temperatures had decreased to less than 10°C or waiting until early summer. This research suggests that full-season assessments of fall, spring, and summer urea application dates on CO<sub>2ea</sub> are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":15732,"journal":{"name":"Journal of environmental quality","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Late spring urea application increased apparent carbon dioxide equivalence emissions but fall and summer applications did not.\",\"authors\":\"G W Reicks, D E Clay, S A Clay, D R Joshi, J Moriles-Miller, S Westhoff, S A Bruggeman\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jeq2.70050\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Synchronizing nitrogen (N) fertilizer application with plant N uptake, as opposed to applying earlier, is believed to improve N use efficiency while simultaneously reducing nitrate leaching, ammonia volatilization, and greenhouse gas emissions. However, little research has been conducted to confirm that this is true. Therefore, this study's objective was to determine the effect of urea application date (early fall, mid-fall, late fall, late spring, early summer, and midsummer) and rate (0 and 224 kg N ha<sup>-1</sup>) on the apparent carbon dioxide equivalence (CO<sub>2ea</sub>). This completely randomized field experiment was conducted six times (dates) where each treatment was replicated four times. Soil temperature and moisture along with greenhouse gases (N<sub>2</sub>O, CO<sub>2</sub>, and CH<sub>4</sub>,) were measured every 4 h for 21 days at Aurora, SD, in 2017 and 2018. N<sub>2</sub>O and CH<sub>4</sub> were expressed in carbon dioxide equivalence, and all three gases were summed to CO<sub>2ea</sub>. Delaying the fertilizer from early to late fall decreased CO<sub>2ea</sub> from 69,375 to 18,420 g CO<sub>2ea</sub> (ha × day)<sup>-1</sup>. During late spring through midsummer, CO<sub>2ea</sub> were similar for the three application dates and averaged 101,500 g CO<sub>2ea</sub> (ha × day)<sup>-1</sup>. This study showed that the lowest CO<sub>2ea</sub> values for the 3 weeks following the application were associated with applying urea in the fall after the temperatures had decreased to less than 10°C or waiting until early summer. This research suggests that full-season assessments of fall, spring, and summer urea application dates on CO<sub>2ea</sub> are warranted.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15732,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of environmental quality\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of environmental quality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jeq2.70050\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of environmental quality","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jeq2.70050","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
与提前施用氮肥相比,将氮肥施用与植物氮素吸收同步施用可以提高氮素利用效率,同时减少硝酸盐淋失、氨挥发和温室气体排放。然而,很少有研究证实这是真的。因此,本研究的目的是确定尿素施用日期(早秋、秋中、秋末、春末、初夏和仲夏)和施用量(0和224 kg N ha-1)对表观二氧化碳当量(CO2ea)的影响。这个完全随机的现场试验进行了六次(日期),每个处理重复四次。在2017年和2018年的21天里,每4小时测量一次土壤温度和湿度以及温室气体(N2O、CO2和CH4)。N2O和CH4以二氧化碳当量表示,三种气体求和为CO2ea。延迟早秋至晚秋施肥使CO2ea从69,375 g降低到18,420 g(公顷×天)-1。在春末至仲夏期间,三个施用日期的CO2ea相似,平均为101,500 g CO2ea (ha × day)-1。本研究表明,施用后3周的最低CO2ea值与在秋季气温降至10℃以下或等到初夏时施用尿素有关。这项研究表明,秋季、春季和夏季尿素施用日期对CO2ea的全季评估是有必要的。
Late spring urea application increased apparent carbon dioxide equivalence emissions but fall and summer applications did not.
Synchronizing nitrogen (N) fertilizer application with plant N uptake, as opposed to applying earlier, is believed to improve N use efficiency while simultaneously reducing nitrate leaching, ammonia volatilization, and greenhouse gas emissions. However, little research has been conducted to confirm that this is true. Therefore, this study's objective was to determine the effect of urea application date (early fall, mid-fall, late fall, late spring, early summer, and midsummer) and rate (0 and 224 kg N ha-1) on the apparent carbon dioxide equivalence (CO2ea). This completely randomized field experiment was conducted six times (dates) where each treatment was replicated four times. Soil temperature and moisture along with greenhouse gases (N2O, CO2, and CH4,) were measured every 4 h for 21 days at Aurora, SD, in 2017 and 2018. N2O and CH4 were expressed in carbon dioxide equivalence, and all three gases were summed to CO2ea. Delaying the fertilizer from early to late fall decreased CO2ea from 69,375 to 18,420 g CO2ea (ha × day)-1. During late spring through midsummer, CO2ea were similar for the three application dates and averaged 101,500 g CO2ea (ha × day)-1. This study showed that the lowest CO2ea values for the 3 weeks following the application were associated with applying urea in the fall after the temperatures had decreased to less than 10°C or waiting until early summer. This research suggests that full-season assessments of fall, spring, and summer urea application dates on CO2ea are warranted.
期刊介绍:
Articles in JEQ cover various aspects of anthropogenic impacts on the environment, including agricultural, terrestrial, atmospheric, and aquatic systems, with emphasis on the understanding of underlying processes. To be acceptable for consideration in JEQ, a manuscript must make a significant contribution to the advancement of knowledge or toward a better understanding of existing concepts. The study should define principles of broad applicability, be related to problems over a sizable geographic area, or be of potential interest to a representative number of scientists. Emphasis is given to the understanding of underlying processes rather than to monitoring.
Contributions are accepted from all disciplines for consideration by the editorial board. Manuscripts may be volunteered, invited, or coordinated as a special section or symposium.