标准和双周trifluridine/tipiracil +贝伐单抗治疗晚期或复发性结直肠癌的比较:一项回顾性研究

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Yosuke Ando, Hiroshi Matsuoka, Hanaho Orito, Takuma Ishihara, Tomohiro Mizuno, Nanaho Hiraga, Hidetoshi Katsuno, Zenichi Morise, Akihiko Horiguchi, Koichi Suda, Takahiro Hayashi, Shigeki Yamada
{"title":"标准和双周trifluridine/tipiracil +贝伐单抗治疗晚期或复发性结直肠癌的比较:一项回顾性研究","authors":"Yosuke Ando, Hiroshi Matsuoka, Hanaho Orito, Takuma Ishihara, Tomohiro Mizuno, Nanaho Hiraga, Hidetoshi Katsuno, Zenichi Morise, Akihiko Horiguchi, Koichi Suda, Takahiro Hayashi, Shigeki Yamada","doi":"10.1093/jjco/hyaf108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) plus bevacizumab (BEV) is a standard third-line therapy for unresectable advanced or recurrent colorectal cancer. The standard dosing schedule (5 days of administration followed by 2 days off) is associated with a high incidence of severe neutropenia. Conversely, a biweekly dosing schedule (5 days of administration followed by 9 days off) reportedly reduces this incidence. However, no direct comparison of these regimens has been made. In this study, we retrospectively compared the efficacy and safety of these two dosing schedules.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed data from patients who received FTD/TPI + BEV treatment between June 2016 and January 2024 at three hospitals affiliated with Fujita Health University. The effects of the dosing schedules on hematological toxicity, overall survival (OS), and time to treatment failure (TTF) were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 125 patients, 26 and 99 were classified into the standard and biweekly groups, respectively. Grade ≥ 3 neutropenia occurred in 50.0% of patients in the standard group and 29.3% of those in the biweekly group (P = .062), with multivariable analysis confirming the dosing schedule impact (P = .048). Median TTF was 5.4 and 7.0 months, while median OS was 16.4 and 14.5 months (P = .908, 0.947) in the standard and biweekly groups, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The biweekly regimen of FTD/TPI + BEV resulted in a lower tendency for severe neutropenia than that in the standard regimen, while maintaining comparable OS and TTF in patients with unresectable advanced or recurrent colorectal cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":14656,"journal":{"name":"Japanese journal of clinical oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of standard and biweekly trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab regimens in advanced or recurrent colorectal cancer: a retrospective study.\",\"authors\":\"Yosuke Ando, Hiroshi Matsuoka, Hanaho Orito, Takuma Ishihara, Tomohiro Mizuno, Nanaho Hiraga, Hidetoshi Katsuno, Zenichi Morise, Akihiko Horiguchi, Koichi Suda, Takahiro Hayashi, Shigeki Yamada\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jjco/hyaf108\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) plus bevacizumab (BEV) is a standard third-line therapy for unresectable advanced or recurrent colorectal cancer. The standard dosing schedule (5 days of administration followed by 2 days off) is associated with a high incidence of severe neutropenia. Conversely, a biweekly dosing schedule (5 days of administration followed by 9 days off) reportedly reduces this incidence. However, no direct comparison of these regimens has been made. In this study, we retrospectively compared the efficacy and safety of these two dosing schedules.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed data from patients who received FTD/TPI + BEV treatment between June 2016 and January 2024 at three hospitals affiliated with Fujita Health University. The effects of the dosing schedules on hematological toxicity, overall survival (OS), and time to treatment failure (TTF) were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 125 patients, 26 and 99 were classified into the standard and biweekly groups, respectively. Grade ≥ 3 neutropenia occurred in 50.0% of patients in the standard group and 29.3% of those in the biweekly group (P = .062), with multivariable analysis confirming the dosing schedule impact (P = .048). Median TTF was 5.4 and 7.0 months, while median OS was 16.4 and 14.5 months (P = .908, 0.947) in the standard and biweekly groups, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The biweekly regimen of FTD/TPI + BEV resulted in a lower tendency for severe neutropenia than that in the standard regimen, while maintaining comparable OS and TTF in patients with unresectable advanced or recurrent colorectal cancer.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14656,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Japanese journal of clinical oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Japanese journal of clinical oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jjco/hyaf108\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese journal of clinical oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jjco/hyaf108","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:Trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) + bevacizumab (BEV)是治疗晚期或复发性结直肠癌的标准三线治疗方案。标准给药方案(5天给药后休息2天)与严重中性粒细胞减少症的高发相关。相反,据报道,双周给药计划(5天给药,然后休息9天)可以减少这种发生率。然而,没有对这些方案进行直接比较。在这项研究中,我们回顾性地比较了这两种给药方案的有效性和安全性。方法:我们分析了2016年6月至2024年1月在藤田卫生大学附属三家医院接受FTD/TPI + BEV治疗的患者的数据。评估给药方案对血液学毒性、总生存期(OS)和治疗失败时间(TTF)的影响。结果:125例患者中,标准组26例,双周组99例。标准组患者≥3级中性粒细胞减少发生率为50.0%,双周治疗组为29.3% (P = 0.062),多变量分析证实了给药方案的影响(P = 0.048)。标准组和双周治疗组的中位TTF分别为5.4和7.0个月,中位OS分别为16.4和14.5个月(P = 0.908, 0.947)。结论:两周FTD/TPI + BEV方案导致严重中性粒细胞减少的倾向低于标准方案,同时在不可切除的晚期或复发结直肠癌患者中保持相当的OS和TTF。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of standard and biweekly trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab regimens in advanced or recurrent colorectal cancer: a retrospective study.

Background: Trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) plus bevacizumab (BEV) is a standard third-line therapy for unresectable advanced or recurrent colorectal cancer. The standard dosing schedule (5 days of administration followed by 2 days off) is associated with a high incidence of severe neutropenia. Conversely, a biweekly dosing schedule (5 days of administration followed by 9 days off) reportedly reduces this incidence. However, no direct comparison of these regimens has been made. In this study, we retrospectively compared the efficacy and safety of these two dosing schedules.

Methods: We analyzed data from patients who received FTD/TPI + BEV treatment between June 2016 and January 2024 at three hospitals affiliated with Fujita Health University. The effects of the dosing schedules on hematological toxicity, overall survival (OS), and time to treatment failure (TTF) were assessed.

Results: Among the 125 patients, 26 and 99 were classified into the standard and biweekly groups, respectively. Grade ≥ 3 neutropenia occurred in 50.0% of patients in the standard group and 29.3% of those in the biweekly group (P = .062), with multivariable analysis confirming the dosing schedule impact (P = .048). Median TTF was 5.4 and 7.0 months, while median OS was 16.4 and 14.5 months (P = .908, 0.947) in the standard and biweekly groups, respectively.

Conclusion: The biweekly regimen of FTD/TPI + BEV resulted in a lower tendency for severe neutropenia than that in the standard regimen, while maintaining comparable OS and TTF in patients with unresectable advanced or recurrent colorectal cancer.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
177
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology is a multidisciplinary journal for clinical oncologists which strives to publish high quality manuscripts addressing medical oncology, clinical trials, radiology, surgery, basic research, and palliative care. The journal aims to contribute to the world"s scientific community with special attention to the area of clinical oncology and the Asian region. JJCO publishes various articles types including: ・Original Articles ・Case Reports ・Clinical Trial Notes ・Cancer Genetics Reports ・Epidemiology Notes ・Technical Notes ・Short Communications ・Letters to the Editors ・Solicited Reviews
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信