定义和诊断标准的保留产物的概念后,早期妊娠丢失:一个系统的回顾。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Human Fertility Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-08 DOI:10.1080/14647273.2025.2522054
Ursula Blyth, Hanine Fourie, Lydia Akinola, Carolyn Smith, Pedro Melo, Ingrid Granne
{"title":"定义和诊断标准的保留产物的概念后,早期妊娠丢失:一个系统的回顾。","authors":"Ursula Blyth, Hanine Fourie, Lydia Akinola, Carolyn Smith, Pedro Melo, Ingrid Granne","doi":"10.1080/14647273.2025.2522054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Retained products of conception (RPOC) is a common complication following first-trimester pregnancy loss. However, there are no formal recommendations regarding the diagnosis of RPOC. This systematic review aimed to synthesise and critically appraise the existing evidence on the definition and diagnostic criteria for RPOC. We registered this systematic review prospectively with PROSPERO (CRD42023444456). A comprehensive literature search was conducted in October 2024 using the following databases: Embase (OVID), Medline (OVID), Global Health, CINAHL on EBSCOhost, Cochrane Central and Web of Science. Databases were searched using free-text keywords and subject headings for the key concepts of 'early', 'miscarriage' and 'retained'. Data were extracted and 2 by 2 tables populated. Risk of bias and quality assessments were performed using the QUADAS-2 tool. The literature search yielded 2,014 articles that were screened for eligibility, resulting in the inclusion of 17 studies in the final analysis. Ultrasound scan was the primary diagnostic tool, used in 16 of the 17 included studies. Ultrasound diagnostic markers included: endometrial thickness (ET), the presence of hyperechoic or echogenic material, and colour flow Doppler. One study used persistent bleeding for more than 14 days as the primary diagnostic marker. There was significant variation in the diagnostic thresholds used and no single ultrasound marker demonstrated consistent reliability in diagnosing RPOC. The findings of this review highlight the limitations of ultrasound as a standalone diagnostic tool for RPOC. Given the lack of clear diagnostic criteria, clinicians should integrate ultrasound findings with clinical symptoms to improve diagnostic accuracy. RPOC appears to be a distinct pathology within the spectrum of early pregnancy loss, characterised by the persistence of pregnancy tissue within the uterine cavity despite initial management which distinguishes it from incomplete miscarriage. This review provides a foundation for future research and calls for a Delphi consensus to refine the diagnosis and management of RPOC.</p>","PeriodicalId":13006,"journal":{"name":"Human Fertility","volume":"28 1","pages":"2522054"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Definition and diagnostic criteria of retained products of conception following first-trimester pregnancy loss: a systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Ursula Blyth, Hanine Fourie, Lydia Akinola, Carolyn Smith, Pedro Melo, Ingrid Granne\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14647273.2025.2522054\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Retained products of conception (RPOC) is a common complication following first-trimester pregnancy loss. However, there are no formal recommendations regarding the diagnosis of RPOC. This systematic review aimed to synthesise and critically appraise the existing evidence on the definition and diagnostic criteria for RPOC. We registered this systematic review prospectively with PROSPERO (CRD42023444456). A comprehensive literature search was conducted in October 2024 using the following databases: Embase (OVID), Medline (OVID), Global Health, CINAHL on EBSCOhost, Cochrane Central and Web of Science. Databases were searched using free-text keywords and subject headings for the key concepts of 'early', 'miscarriage' and 'retained'. Data were extracted and 2 by 2 tables populated. Risk of bias and quality assessments were performed using the QUADAS-2 tool. The literature search yielded 2,014 articles that were screened for eligibility, resulting in the inclusion of 17 studies in the final analysis. Ultrasound scan was the primary diagnostic tool, used in 16 of the 17 included studies. Ultrasound diagnostic markers included: endometrial thickness (ET), the presence of hyperechoic or echogenic material, and colour flow Doppler. One study used persistent bleeding for more than 14 days as the primary diagnostic marker. There was significant variation in the diagnostic thresholds used and no single ultrasound marker demonstrated consistent reliability in diagnosing RPOC. The findings of this review highlight the limitations of ultrasound as a standalone diagnostic tool for RPOC. Given the lack of clear diagnostic criteria, clinicians should integrate ultrasound findings with clinical symptoms to improve diagnostic accuracy. RPOC appears to be a distinct pathology within the spectrum of early pregnancy loss, characterised by the persistence of pregnancy tissue within the uterine cavity despite initial management which distinguishes it from incomplete miscarriage. This review provides a foundation for future research and calls for a Delphi consensus to refine the diagnosis and management of RPOC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13006,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human Fertility\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"2522054\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human Fertility\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14647273.2025.2522054\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Fertility","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14647273.2025.2522054","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

妊娠产物保留(RPOC)是妊娠早期流产后常见的并发症。然而,关于RPOC的诊断没有正式的建议。本系统综述旨在综合和批判性地评估关于RPOC定义和诊断标准的现有证据。我们在PROSPERO (CRD42023444456)注册了该前瞻性系统评价。我们于2024年10月使用以下数据库进行了全面的文献检索:Embase (OVID)、Medline (OVID)、Global Health、CINAHL on EBSCOhost、Cochrane Central和Web of Science。使用自由文本关键词和主题词检索数据库,检索“早期”、“流产”和“保留”等关键概念。提取数据并填充2 × 2表。使用QUADAS-2工具进行偏倚风险和质量评估。文献检索产生了2014篇文章,经过筛选符合资格,最终分析纳入了17项研究。超声扫描是主要的诊断工具,在17个纳入的研究中有16个使用了超声扫描。超声诊断指标包括:子宫内膜厚度(ET)、高回声或回声物质的存在、彩色血流多普勒。一项研究使用持续出血超过14天作为主要诊断标志。所使用的诊断阈值存在显著差异,没有单一超声标记物在诊断RPOC时表现出一致的可靠性。本综述的发现强调了超声作为RPOC的独立诊断工具的局限性。由于缺乏明确的诊断标准,临床医生应将超声检查结果与临床症状相结合,以提高诊断的准确性。RPOC似乎是一种独特的病理范围内的早期妊娠丢失,其特点是妊娠组织在子宫腔内的持久性,尽管最初的管理区别于不完全流产。本综述为今后的研究奠定了基础,并呼吁建立德尔菲共识,以完善RPOC的诊断和治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Definition and diagnostic criteria of retained products of conception following first-trimester pregnancy loss: a systematic review.

Retained products of conception (RPOC) is a common complication following first-trimester pregnancy loss. However, there are no formal recommendations regarding the diagnosis of RPOC. This systematic review aimed to synthesise and critically appraise the existing evidence on the definition and diagnostic criteria for RPOC. We registered this systematic review prospectively with PROSPERO (CRD42023444456). A comprehensive literature search was conducted in October 2024 using the following databases: Embase (OVID), Medline (OVID), Global Health, CINAHL on EBSCOhost, Cochrane Central and Web of Science. Databases were searched using free-text keywords and subject headings for the key concepts of 'early', 'miscarriage' and 'retained'. Data were extracted and 2 by 2 tables populated. Risk of bias and quality assessments were performed using the QUADAS-2 tool. The literature search yielded 2,014 articles that were screened for eligibility, resulting in the inclusion of 17 studies in the final analysis. Ultrasound scan was the primary diagnostic tool, used in 16 of the 17 included studies. Ultrasound diagnostic markers included: endometrial thickness (ET), the presence of hyperechoic or echogenic material, and colour flow Doppler. One study used persistent bleeding for more than 14 days as the primary diagnostic marker. There was significant variation in the diagnostic thresholds used and no single ultrasound marker demonstrated consistent reliability in diagnosing RPOC. The findings of this review highlight the limitations of ultrasound as a standalone diagnostic tool for RPOC. Given the lack of clear diagnostic criteria, clinicians should integrate ultrasound findings with clinical symptoms to improve diagnostic accuracy. RPOC appears to be a distinct pathology within the spectrum of early pregnancy loss, characterised by the persistence of pregnancy tissue within the uterine cavity despite initial management which distinguishes it from incomplete miscarriage. This review provides a foundation for future research and calls for a Delphi consensus to refine the diagnosis and management of RPOC.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Human Fertility
Human Fertility OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
50
期刊介绍: Human Fertility is a leading international, multidisciplinary journal dedicated to furthering research and promoting good practice in the areas of human fertility and infertility. Topics included span the range from molecular medicine to healthcare delivery, and contributions are welcomed from professionals and academics from the spectrum of disciplines concerned with human fertility. It is published on behalf of the British Fertility Society. The journal also provides a forum for the publication of peer-reviewed articles arising out of the activities of the Association of Biomedical Andrologists, the Association of Clinical Embryologists, the Association of Irish Clinical Embryologists, the British Andrology Society, the British Infertility Counselling Association, the Irish Fertility Society and the Royal College of Nursing Fertility Nurses Group. All submissions are welcome. Articles considered include original papers, reviews, policy statements, commentaries, debates, correspondence, and reports of sessions at meetings. The journal also publishes refereed abstracts from the meetings of the constituent organizations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信