超声评估糖糖增强儿童膈功能早期恢复:一项随机双盲对照试验。

IF 6.8 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
European Journal of Anaesthesiology Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-07 DOI:10.1097/EJA.0000000000002231
Jung-Bin Park, Tae-Won Kim, Sang-Hwan Ji, Young-Eun Jang, Eun-Hee Kim, Jin-Tae Kim, Hee-Soo Kim, Ji-Hyun Lee
{"title":"超声评估糖糖增强儿童膈功能早期恢复:一项随机双盲对照试验。","authors":"Jung-Bin Park, Tae-Won Kim, Sang-Hwan Ji, Young-Eun Jang, Eun-Hee Kim, Jin-Tae Kim, Hee-Soo Kim, Ji-Hyun Lee","doi":"10.1097/EJA.0000000000002231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In adults, sugammadex promotes faster neuromuscular recovery compared with neostigmine; however, its impact on diaphragmatic recovery and atelectasis in children remains unelucidated.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We compared the effects of sugammadex and neostigmine on restoration of diaphragmatic function and postoperative atelectasis in paediatric patients.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A prospective randomised controlled study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Seoul National University Children's Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>A total of 73 children aged 2 to 7 years were randomised to receive either sugammadex (2 mg kg -1 , n  = 36) or neostigmine (0.02 mg kg -1 , n  = 37) for neuromuscular blockade reversal when the train-of-four count reached 4 (train-of-four ratio < 0.9).</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>The diaphragmatic excursion (DE) and thickening fraction (TF) were measured by ultrasound at three timepoints: baseline (T0), before postanaesthesia care unit (PACU) admission (T1) and 30 min after PACU admission (T2). Atelectasis was assessed via lung ultrasonography at T1 and T2. The primary outcome was the diaphragmatic excursion ratio at T1 (DE T1 /DE T0 ), and secondary outcomes included the DE T2 /DE T0 , TF T1 /TF T0 , TF T2 /TF T0 atelectasis score and incidence of significant atelectasis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At T1, the DE T1 /DE T0 was significantly higher in the sugammadex group (neostigmine vs. sugammadex group, 0.91 ± 0.19 vs. 1.02 ± 0.24; P  = 0.034) as was the TF T1 /TF T0 (0.93 ± 0.39 vs. 1.15 ± 0.49; P  = 0.041). No significant intergroup differences were found in the DE T2 /DE T0 and TF T2 /TF T0 . The atelectasis score and incidence of significant atelectasis were comparable between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared to neostigmine, sugammadex accelerates diaphragmatic recovery immediately after extubation; however, this early recovery does not significantly reduce the incidence of postoperative atelectasis.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT05724550.</p>","PeriodicalId":11920,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Anaesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":"907-915"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ultrasonographic assessment of sugammadex-enhanced early recovery of diaphragmatic function in children: A randomised double-blind controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Jung-Bin Park, Tae-Won Kim, Sang-Hwan Ji, Young-Eun Jang, Eun-Hee Kim, Jin-Tae Kim, Hee-Soo Kim, Ji-Hyun Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/EJA.0000000000002231\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In adults, sugammadex promotes faster neuromuscular recovery compared with neostigmine; however, its impact on diaphragmatic recovery and atelectasis in children remains unelucidated.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We compared the effects of sugammadex and neostigmine on restoration of diaphragmatic function and postoperative atelectasis in paediatric patients.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A prospective randomised controlled study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Seoul National University Children's Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>A total of 73 children aged 2 to 7 years were randomised to receive either sugammadex (2 mg kg -1 , n  = 36) or neostigmine (0.02 mg kg -1 , n  = 37) for neuromuscular blockade reversal when the train-of-four count reached 4 (train-of-four ratio < 0.9).</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>The diaphragmatic excursion (DE) and thickening fraction (TF) were measured by ultrasound at three timepoints: baseline (T0), before postanaesthesia care unit (PACU) admission (T1) and 30 min after PACU admission (T2). Atelectasis was assessed via lung ultrasonography at T1 and T2. The primary outcome was the diaphragmatic excursion ratio at T1 (DE T1 /DE T0 ), and secondary outcomes included the DE T2 /DE T0 , TF T1 /TF T0 , TF T2 /TF T0 atelectasis score and incidence of significant atelectasis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At T1, the DE T1 /DE T0 was significantly higher in the sugammadex group (neostigmine vs. sugammadex group, 0.91 ± 0.19 vs. 1.02 ± 0.24; P  = 0.034) as was the TF T1 /TF T0 (0.93 ± 0.39 vs. 1.15 ± 0.49; P  = 0.041). No significant intergroup differences were found in the DE T2 /DE T0 and TF T2 /TF T0 . The atelectasis score and incidence of significant atelectasis were comparable between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared to neostigmine, sugammadex accelerates diaphragmatic recovery immediately after extubation; however, this early recovery does not significantly reduce the incidence of postoperative atelectasis.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT05724550.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11920,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Anaesthesiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"907-915\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Anaesthesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0000000000002231\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Anaesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0000000000002231","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在成人中,与新斯的明相比,糖玛德能促进更快的神经肌肉恢复;然而,其对儿童膈肌恢复和肺不张的影响尚不清楚。目的:比较糖马德和新斯的明对小儿膈肌功能恢复和术后肺不张的影响。设计:前瞻性随机对照研究。地点:韩国首尔国立大学儿童医院。患者:共有73名2至7岁的儿童被随机分配,当四列计数达到4(四列比率< 0.9)时,接受糖玛德(2mg kg-1, n = 36)或新斯的明(0.02 mg kg-1, n = 37)进行神经肌肉阻断逆转。主要观察指标:超声在三个时间点测量膈肌偏移(DE)和增厚分数(TF):基线(T0)、麻醉后护理单元(PACU)入院前(T1)和PACU入院后30分钟(T2)。在T1和T2通过肺部超声检查评估肺不张。主要终点是T1时膈漂移比(DET1/DET0),次要终点包括DET2/DET0、TFT1/TFT0、TFT2/TFT0不张评分和明显不张发生率。结果:T1时,糖胺酮组的DET1/DET0明显高于糖胺酮组(新斯的明vs糖胺酮组,0.91±0.19 vs 1.02±0.24;P = 0.034)就像TFT1 / TFT0(0.93±0.39和1.15±0.49;p = 0.041)。DET2/DET0和TFT2/TFT0组间无显著差异。两组间的肺不张评分和显著性肺不张发生率具有可比性。结论:与新斯的明相比,糖马德能在拔管后立即促进膈肌恢复;然而,这种早期恢复并不能显著降低术后肺不张的发生率。试验注册号:NCT05724550。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ultrasonographic assessment of sugammadex-enhanced early recovery of diaphragmatic function in children: A randomised double-blind controlled trial.

Background: In adults, sugammadex promotes faster neuromuscular recovery compared with neostigmine; however, its impact on diaphragmatic recovery and atelectasis in children remains unelucidated.

Objectives: We compared the effects of sugammadex and neostigmine on restoration of diaphragmatic function and postoperative atelectasis in paediatric patients.

Design: A prospective randomised controlled study.

Setting: Seoul National University Children's Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Patients: A total of 73 children aged 2 to 7 years were randomised to receive either sugammadex (2 mg kg -1 , n  = 36) or neostigmine (0.02 mg kg -1 , n  = 37) for neuromuscular blockade reversal when the train-of-four count reached 4 (train-of-four ratio < 0.9).

Main outcome measures: The diaphragmatic excursion (DE) and thickening fraction (TF) were measured by ultrasound at three timepoints: baseline (T0), before postanaesthesia care unit (PACU) admission (T1) and 30 min after PACU admission (T2). Atelectasis was assessed via lung ultrasonography at T1 and T2. The primary outcome was the diaphragmatic excursion ratio at T1 (DE T1 /DE T0 ), and secondary outcomes included the DE T2 /DE T0 , TF T1 /TF T0 , TF T2 /TF T0 atelectasis score and incidence of significant atelectasis.

Results: At T1, the DE T1 /DE T0 was significantly higher in the sugammadex group (neostigmine vs. sugammadex group, 0.91 ± 0.19 vs. 1.02 ± 0.24; P  = 0.034) as was the TF T1 /TF T0 (0.93 ± 0.39 vs. 1.15 ± 0.49; P  = 0.041). No significant intergroup differences were found in the DE T2 /DE T0 and TF T2 /TF T0 . The atelectasis score and incidence of significant atelectasis were comparable between the groups.

Conclusions: Compared to neostigmine, sugammadex accelerates diaphragmatic recovery immediately after extubation; however, this early recovery does not significantly reduce the incidence of postoperative atelectasis.

Trial registration number: NCT05724550.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
351
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Anaesthesiology (EJA) publishes original work of high scientific quality in the field of anaesthesiology, pain, emergency medicine and intensive care. Preference is given to experimental work or clinical observation in man, and to laboratory work of clinical relevance. The journal also publishes commissioned reviews by an authority, editorials, invited commentaries, special articles, pro and con debates, and short reports (correspondences, case reports, short reports of clinical studies).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信