视觉艺术中负面审美评价的神经相关性:神经影像学荟萃分析。

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Ryan Joseph Slaby, Maria Arioli, Marco Tettamanti, Zaira Cattaneo
{"title":"视觉艺术中负面审美评价的神经相关性:神经影像学荟萃分析。","authors":"Ryan Joseph Slaby, Maria Arioli, Marco Tettamanti, Zaira Cattaneo","doi":"10.1093/cercor/bhaf156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Neuroaesthetics has focused on investigating positive aesthetic evaluations while neglecting negative aesthetic evaluations. The employment of domain-general neural systems may engender hedonic valuation across an affective space of (dis)pleasure towards artistic and non-artistic stimuli. Hence, we conducted a meta-analysis assessing neural correlates associated with negative aesthetic evaluations towards visual artwork (NAE) and with viewing or evaluating negative non-artistic images from the International Affective Picture System (N-IAPS). Literature search screenings found 16 studies and 16 experiments for the NAE and 46 studies and 47 experiments for the N-IAPS. GingerALE software employed activation likelihood estimation analyses to specify neural correlates within and between NAE and N-IAPS. Meta-analytic results from the NAE solely revealed the right fusiform gyrus encroaching the anterior cerebellum, while activations across frontal, occipital, temporal and subcortical areas were revealed for the N-IAPS. A commonality between the NAE and N-IAPS was revealed within the right fusiform gyrus. These results suggest that the domain-general neural systems are at play across negative visual affective experiences, yet the context of stimulus engagement, such as aesthetic, may modulate how these neural systems are employed. Given the scarcity of results, future research in neuroaesthetics must expand from positive aesthetic evaluations to ascertain neural correlates within negative aesthetic evaluations.</p>","PeriodicalId":9715,"journal":{"name":"Cerebral cortex","volume":"35 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12235005/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neural correlates of negative aesthetic evaluations in visual art: a neuroimaging meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Ryan Joseph Slaby, Maria Arioli, Marco Tettamanti, Zaira Cattaneo\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/cercor/bhaf156\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Neuroaesthetics has focused on investigating positive aesthetic evaluations while neglecting negative aesthetic evaluations. The employment of domain-general neural systems may engender hedonic valuation across an affective space of (dis)pleasure towards artistic and non-artistic stimuli. Hence, we conducted a meta-analysis assessing neural correlates associated with negative aesthetic evaluations towards visual artwork (NAE) and with viewing or evaluating negative non-artistic images from the International Affective Picture System (N-IAPS). Literature search screenings found 16 studies and 16 experiments for the NAE and 46 studies and 47 experiments for the N-IAPS. GingerALE software employed activation likelihood estimation analyses to specify neural correlates within and between NAE and N-IAPS. Meta-analytic results from the NAE solely revealed the right fusiform gyrus encroaching the anterior cerebellum, while activations across frontal, occipital, temporal and subcortical areas were revealed for the N-IAPS. A commonality between the NAE and N-IAPS was revealed within the right fusiform gyrus. These results suggest that the domain-general neural systems are at play across negative visual affective experiences, yet the context of stimulus engagement, such as aesthetic, may modulate how these neural systems are employed. Given the scarcity of results, future research in neuroaesthetics must expand from positive aesthetic evaluations to ascertain neural correlates within negative aesthetic evaluations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9715,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cerebral cortex\",\"volume\":\"35 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12235005/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cerebral cortex\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhaf156\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cerebral cortex","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhaf156","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

神经美学关注的是积极的审美评价,而忽视了消极的审美评价。领域通用神经系统的使用可能会产生对艺术和非艺术刺激的(不)快乐的情感空间的享乐评价。因此,我们进行了一项荟萃分析,评估与对视觉艺术品(NAE)的负面美学评价相关的神经关联,以及与观看或评估来自国际情感图片系统(N-IAPS)的负面非艺术图像相关的神经关联。文献检索筛选发现NAE有16项研究和16个实验,N-IAPS有46项研究和47个实验。GingerALE软件采用激活似然估计分析来指定NAE和N-IAPS内部和之间的神经关联。NAE的荟萃分析结果仅显示右侧梭状回侵犯小脑前部,而N-IAPS则显示额叶、枕叶、颞叶和皮质下区域的激活。在右侧梭状回内发现了NAE和N-IAPS的共性。这些结果表明,领域通用神经系统在消极的视觉情感体验中发挥作用,但刺激参与的背景,如审美,可能会调节这些神经系统的使用方式。鉴于结果的稀缺性,未来的神经美学研究必须从积极的审美评价扩展到确定消极的审美评价中的神经相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Neural correlates of negative aesthetic evaluations in visual art: a neuroimaging meta-analysis.

Neuroaesthetics has focused on investigating positive aesthetic evaluations while neglecting negative aesthetic evaluations. The employment of domain-general neural systems may engender hedonic valuation across an affective space of (dis)pleasure towards artistic and non-artistic stimuli. Hence, we conducted a meta-analysis assessing neural correlates associated with negative aesthetic evaluations towards visual artwork (NAE) and with viewing or evaluating negative non-artistic images from the International Affective Picture System (N-IAPS). Literature search screenings found 16 studies and 16 experiments for the NAE and 46 studies and 47 experiments for the N-IAPS. GingerALE software employed activation likelihood estimation analyses to specify neural correlates within and between NAE and N-IAPS. Meta-analytic results from the NAE solely revealed the right fusiform gyrus encroaching the anterior cerebellum, while activations across frontal, occipital, temporal and subcortical areas were revealed for the N-IAPS. A commonality between the NAE and N-IAPS was revealed within the right fusiform gyrus. These results suggest that the domain-general neural systems are at play across negative visual affective experiences, yet the context of stimulus engagement, such as aesthetic, may modulate how these neural systems are employed. Given the scarcity of results, future research in neuroaesthetics must expand from positive aesthetic evaluations to ascertain neural correlates within negative aesthetic evaluations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cerebral cortex
Cerebral cortex 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
8.10%
发文量
510
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Cerebral Cortex publishes papers on the development, organization, plasticity, and function of the cerebral cortex, including the hippocampus. Studies with clear relevance to the cerebral cortex, such as the thalamocortical relationship or cortico-subcortical interactions, are also included. The journal is multidisciplinary and covers the large variety of modern neurobiological and neuropsychological techniques, including anatomy, biochemistry, molecular neurobiology, electrophysiology, behavior, artificial intelligence, and theoretical modeling. In addition to research articles, special features such as brief reviews, book reviews, and commentaries are included.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信