{"title":"钬激光与常规手术切除尿道痈:微创效果的比较研究。","authors":"Shuxia Zhu, Ting Zeng, Qiang Liu","doi":"10.1186/s12894-025-01852-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of holmium laser resection versus conventional surgical excision for the treatment of urethral caruncle. The study aimed to evaluate the potential advantages of holmium laser, such as its precision and minimal invasiveness, over traditional surgical methods.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study included 116 patients (50 laser vs. 66 conventional) from June 2020 to August 2023. Outcomes included operative time, complications, and recurrence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The laser cohort demonstrated statistically significant reductions in operation duration (6.4 ± 1.2 vs. 28 ± 4.3 min, p < 0.001), catheterization time (2.1 ± 0.8 vs. 6.3 ± 1.5 days, p < 0.001), and length of hospitalization (3.2 ± 0.8 vs. 4.3 ± 1.1 days, p < 0.001) compared to the conventional surgical group. The holmium laser group had lower postoperative bleeding rates (0% vs. 6.0%, p = 0.08). One recurrence occurred in the conventional surgical group. No patient in either group developed urethral stricture during the follow-up period.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Holmium laser resection is a safe and efficient alternative for urethral caruncle, associated with reduced operative time and morbidity.</p>","PeriodicalId":9285,"journal":{"name":"BMC Urology","volume":"25 1","pages":"161"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12232686/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Resection of urethral caruncles with holmium laser vs. conventional excision: a comparative study of minimally invasive outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"Shuxia Zhu, Ting Zeng, Qiang Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12894-025-01852-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of holmium laser resection versus conventional surgical excision for the treatment of urethral caruncle. The study aimed to evaluate the potential advantages of holmium laser, such as its precision and minimal invasiveness, over traditional surgical methods.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study included 116 patients (50 laser vs. 66 conventional) from June 2020 to August 2023. Outcomes included operative time, complications, and recurrence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The laser cohort demonstrated statistically significant reductions in operation duration (6.4 ± 1.2 vs. 28 ± 4.3 min, p < 0.001), catheterization time (2.1 ± 0.8 vs. 6.3 ± 1.5 days, p < 0.001), and length of hospitalization (3.2 ± 0.8 vs. 4.3 ± 1.1 days, p < 0.001) compared to the conventional surgical group. The holmium laser group had lower postoperative bleeding rates (0% vs. 6.0%, p = 0.08). One recurrence occurred in the conventional surgical group. No patient in either group developed urethral stricture during the follow-up period.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Holmium laser resection is a safe and efficient alternative for urethral caruncle, associated with reduced operative time and morbidity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9285,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Urology\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"161\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12232686/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-025-01852-1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-025-01852-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Resection of urethral caruncles with holmium laser vs. conventional excision: a comparative study of minimally invasive outcomes.
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of holmium laser resection versus conventional surgical excision for the treatment of urethral caruncle. The study aimed to evaluate the potential advantages of holmium laser, such as its precision and minimal invasiveness, over traditional surgical methods.
Methods: A retrospective cohort study included 116 patients (50 laser vs. 66 conventional) from June 2020 to August 2023. Outcomes included operative time, complications, and recurrence.
Results: The laser cohort demonstrated statistically significant reductions in operation duration (6.4 ± 1.2 vs. 28 ± 4.3 min, p < 0.001), catheterization time (2.1 ± 0.8 vs. 6.3 ± 1.5 days, p < 0.001), and length of hospitalization (3.2 ± 0.8 vs. 4.3 ± 1.1 days, p < 0.001) compared to the conventional surgical group. The holmium laser group had lower postoperative bleeding rates (0% vs. 6.0%, p = 0.08). One recurrence occurred in the conventional surgical group. No patient in either group developed urethral stricture during the follow-up period.
Conclusion: Holmium laser resection is a safe and efficient alternative for urethral caruncle, associated with reduced operative time and morbidity.
期刊介绍:
BMC Urology is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of urological disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
The journal considers manuscripts in the following broad subject-specific sections of urology:
Endourology and technology
Epidemiology and health outcomes
Pediatric urology
Pre-clinical and basic research
Reconstructive urology
Sexual function and fertility
Urological imaging
Urological oncology
Voiding dysfunction
Case reports.