{"title":"st段抬高型心肌梗死患者单导管经皮冠状动脉介入治疗方法:speed - pci研究。","authors":"Sho Torii, Akihiko Takahashi, Yujiro Ono, Masanori Taniwaki, Mitsutoshi Oguri, Masanori Teramura, Ryuichi Kato, Shuji Otsuki, Hiroshi Suzuki, Fuminobu Yoshimachi, Hironori Ueda, Keisuke Shioji, Gaku Nakazawa, Kaoru Sakurai, Mitsuru Tsujimoto, Motosu Ando, Toshiyuki Kozai, Rie Aoyama, Yuji Ikari","doi":"10.1007/s12928-025-01162-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Reducing total ischemic time in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is crucial for improving outcomes. While procedural time during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is critical, strategies to shorten it need to be explored. To examine whether the single-catheter PCI (SC-PCI) method using a universal guiding catheter, Ikari-Left curve, without catheter exchange reduces PCI time compared to conventional PCI (C-PCI). The Speedy PCI study is a prospective, multicenter, randomized trial comparing SC-PCI versus C-PCI. The primary endpoint was the time from sheath insertion to first device activation (S2B) time. Secondary endpoints included door-to-balloon time, total ischemia time, fluoroscopy time, contrast volume, hospital expenses, and 30-day mortality. A total of 380 patients (SC-PCI: 194; C-PCI: 186) were analyzed. Both groups had high primary PCI success rates (92.3 vs. 91.9%, p = 0.74) and similar radial access usage (higher than 97%). SC-PCI method showed a significantly shorter S2B time (15.8 ± 10.9 min) compared to the C-PCI method (18.7 ± 10.6 min, p = 0.007) with reduced number of total catheters used (1.2 ± 0.6 vs. 2.7 ± 0.7, p < 0.0001, respectively). No cases of coronary dissection caused by the guiding catheter were observed in the SC-PCI method. Clinical outcomes at 30 days and 1-year follow-up, including all-cause mortality and stroke rates, were similar between the groups. The SC-PCI method using the Ikari curve demonstrated a significant reduction in PCI procedure time while maintaining safety and primary PCI success in primary PCI for STEMI.</p>","PeriodicalId":9439,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Single catheter primary percutaneous coronary intervention method in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: the SPEEDY-PCI study.\",\"authors\":\"Sho Torii, Akihiko Takahashi, Yujiro Ono, Masanori Taniwaki, Mitsutoshi Oguri, Masanori Teramura, Ryuichi Kato, Shuji Otsuki, Hiroshi Suzuki, Fuminobu Yoshimachi, Hironori Ueda, Keisuke Shioji, Gaku Nakazawa, Kaoru Sakurai, Mitsuru Tsujimoto, Motosu Ando, Toshiyuki Kozai, Rie Aoyama, Yuji Ikari\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12928-025-01162-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Reducing total ischemic time in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is crucial for improving outcomes. While procedural time during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is critical, strategies to shorten it need to be explored. To examine whether the single-catheter PCI (SC-PCI) method using a universal guiding catheter, Ikari-Left curve, without catheter exchange reduces PCI time compared to conventional PCI (C-PCI). The Speedy PCI study is a prospective, multicenter, randomized trial comparing SC-PCI versus C-PCI. The primary endpoint was the time from sheath insertion to first device activation (S2B) time. Secondary endpoints included door-to-balloon time, total ischemia time, fluoroscopy time, contrast volume, hospital expenses, and 30-day mortality. A total of 380 patients (SC-PCI: 194; C-PCI: 186) were analyzed. Both groups had high primary PCI success rates (92.3 vs. 91.9%, p = 0.74) and similar radial access usage (higher than 97%). SC-PCI method showed a significantly shorter S2B time (15.8 ± 10.9 min) compared to the C-PCI method (18.7 ± 10.6 min, p = 0.007) with reduced number of total catheters used (1.2 ± 0.6 vs. 2.7 ± 0.7, p < 0.0001, respectively). No cases of coronary dissection caused by the guiding catheter were observed in the SC-PCI method. Clinical outcomes at 30 days and 1-year follow-up, including all-cause mortality and stroke rates, were similar between the groups. The SC-PCI method using the Ikari curve demonstrated a significant reduction in PCI procedure time while maintaining safety and primary PCI success in primary PCI for STEMI.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9439,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12928-025-01162-1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12928-025-01162-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
缩短st段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)的总缺血时间对于改善预后至关重要。虽然初次经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的手术时间至关重要,但需要探索缩短其时间的策略。目的:探讨单导管PCI (SC-PCI)方法与常规PCI (C-PCI)相比,是否使用通用导尿管,Ikari-Left曲线,无需更换导管而缩短PCI时间。Speedy PCI研究是一项前瞻性、多中心、随机试验,比较SC-PCI和C-PCI。主要终点是从鞘插入到首次器械激活(S2B)时间。次要终点包括门到球囊时间、总缺血时间、透视时间、造影剂体积、住院费用和30天死亡率。共380例患者(SC-PCI: 194例;C-PCI: 186)。两组均有较高的初级PCI成功率(92.3 vs 91.9%, p = 0.74)和相似的径向通路使用率(高于97%)。SC-PCI方法的S2B时间(15.8±10.9 min)明显短于C-PCI方法(18.7±10.6 min, p = 0.007),总导管数减少(1.2±0.6 vs. 2.7±0.7,p
Single catheter primary percutaneous coronary intervention method in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: the SPEEDY-PCI study.
Reducing total ischemic time in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is crucial for improving outcomes. While procedural time during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is critical, strategies to shorten it need to be explored. To examine whether the single-catheter PCI (SC-PCI) method using a universal guiding catheter, Ikari-Left curve, without catheter exchange reduces PCI time compared to conventional PCI (C-PCI). The Speedy PCI study is a prospective, multicenter, randomized trial comparing SC-PCI versus C-PCI. The primary endpoint was the time from sheath insertion to first device activation (S2B) time. Secondary endpoints included door-to-balloon time, total ischemia time, fluoroscopy time, contrast volume, hospital expenses, and 30-day mortality. A total of 380 patients (SC-PCI: 194; C-PCI: 186) were analyzed. Both groups had high primary PCI success rates (92.3 vs. 91.9%, p = 0.74) and similar radial access usage (higher than 97%). SC-PCI method showed a significantly shorter S2B time (15.8 ± 10.9 min) compared to the C-PCI method (18.7 ± 10.6 min, p = 0.007) with reduced number of total catheters used (1.2 ± 0.6 vs. 2.7 ± 0.7, p < 0.0001, respectively). No cases of coronary dissection caused by the guiding catheter were observed in the SC-PCI method. Clinical outcomes at 30 days and 1-year follow-up, including all-cause mortality and stroke rates, were similar between the groups. The SC-PCI method using the Ikari curve demonstrated a significant reduction in PCI procedure time while maintaining safety and primary PCI success in primary PCI for STEMI.
期刊介绍:
Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics (CVIT) is an international journal covering the field of cardiovascular disease and includes cardiac (coronary and noncoronary) and peripheral interventions and therapeutics. Articles are subject to peer review and complete editorial evaluation prior to any decision regarding acceptability. CVIT is an official journal of The Japanese Association of Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics.