残余胆固醇和低密度脂蛋白胆固醇不一致与2型糖尿病或前驱糖尿病之间的关系:来自NHANES的结果

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Yijing Xin, Yimeng Wang, Yuyuan Shu, Hanyang Liang, Yanmin Yang
{"title":"残余胆固醇和低密度脂蛋白胆固醇不一致与2型糖尿病或前驱糖尿病之间的关系:来自NHANES的结果","authors":"Yijing Xin, Yimeng Wang, Yuyuan Shu, Hanyang Liang, Yanmin Yang","doi":"10.1186/s12902-025-01995-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>There is limited evidence on the relationship between remnant cholesterol (RC) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) discordance and type 2 diabetes or prediabetes. This study aimed to investigate the association between RC and LDL-C discordance and type 2 diabetes or prediabetes in the general US adult population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from 19,604 participants in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES) (2005-2018) were analyzed. The percentile difference between RC and LDL-C was used to define discordance. Logistic regression models were performed to assess the relationships between RC, LDL-C, RC and LDL-C percentile difference, LDL-C and RC discordant. Nonlinear relationships were explored using restricted cubic splines. Mediation analysis was conducted to evaluate the direct and indirect relationships between abdominal obesity and type 2 diabetes through RC.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>RC was non-linearly and J-shaped correlated with type 2 diabetes and prediabetes, whereas LDL-C was non-linearly and U-shaped correlated with type 2 diabetes and was S-shaped correlated with prediabetes. Compared to concordant participants, those with discordantly low RC population had lower type 2 diabetes odds, while those with the discordantly high RC population had higher type 2 diabetes and prediabetes odds. When a clinical LDL-C cut-off of 2.60 mmol/L was applied, participants in the high LDL-C and low RC group had the lowest odds of type 2 diabetes, while those in the low LDL-C and high RC group had the highest odds. Significant interactions between LDL-C and RC discordance and factors such as age, MetS, and lipid-lowering medications were observed in relation to type 2 diabetes odds. RC was found to mediate 15.86% of the association between abdominal obesity and type 2 diabetes, and 16.22% of the association between abdominal obesity and prediabetes in the non-diabetes population.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Discordantly high RC was associated with higher odds of type 2 diabetes and prediabetes, while discordantly low RC was associated with lower odds of type 2 diabetes.</p>","PeriodicalId":9152,"journal":{"name":"BMC Endocrine Disorders","volume":"25 1","pages":"168"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12232856/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association between remnant cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol discordance and type 2 diabetes or prediabetes: results from NHANES.\",\"authors\":\"Yijing Xin, Yimeng Wang, Yuyuan Shu, Hanyang Liang, Yanmin Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12902-025-01995-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>There is limited evidence on the relationship between remnant cholesterol (RC) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) discordance and type 2 diabetes or prediabetes. This study aimed to investigate the association between RC and LDL-C discordance and type 2 diabetes or prediabetes in the general US adult population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from 19,604 participants in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES) (2005-2018) were analyzed. The percentile difference between RC and LDL-C was used to define discordance. Logistic regression models were performed to assess the relationships between RC, LDL-C, RC and LDL-C percentile difference, LDL-C and RC discordant. Nonlinear relationships were explored using restricted cubic splines. Mediation analysis was conducted to evaluate the direct and indirect relationships between abdominal obesity and type 2 diabetes through RC.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>RC was non-linearly and J-shaped correlated with type 2 diabetes and prediabetes, whereas LDL-C was non-linearly and U-shaped correlated with type 2 diabetes and was S-shaped correlated with prediabetes. Compared to concordant participants, those with discordantly low RC population had lower type 2 diabetes odds, while those with the discordantly high RC population had higher type 2 diabetes and prediabetes odds. When a clinical LDL-C cut-off of 2.60 mmol/L was applied, participants in the high LDL-C and low RC group had the lowest odds of type 2 diabetes, while those in the low LDL-C and high RC group had the highest odds. Significant interactions between LDL-C and RC discordance and factors such as age, MetS, and lipid-lowering medications were observed in relation to type 2 diabetes odds. RC was found to mediate 15.86% of the association between abdominal obesity and type 2 diabetes, and 16.22% of the association between abdominal obesity and prediabetes in the non-diabetes population.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Discordantly high RC was associated with higher odds of type 2 diabetes and prediabetes, while discordantly low RC was associated with lower odds of type 2 diabetes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9152,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Endocrine Disorders\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"168\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12232856/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Endocrine Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12902-025-01995-0\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Endocrine Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12902-025-01995-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:残胆固醇(RC)和低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)不一致与2型糖尿病或前驱糖尿病之间的关系证据有限。本研究旨在调查美国普通成年人中RC和LDL-C不一致与2型糖尿病或前驱糖尿病之间的关系。方法:对2005-2018年美国国家健康与营养调查(NHANES) 19604名参与者的数据进行分析。RC和LDL-C之间的百分位数差异被用来定义不一致性。采用Logistic回归模型评估RC与LDL-C、RC与LDL-C百分位数差异、LDL-C与RC不一致性之间的关系。利用受限三次样条探讨了非线性关系。通过RC进行中介分析,评估腹部肥胖与2型糖尿病的直接和间接关系。结果:RC与2型糖尿病及前驱糖尿病呈非线性j型相关,LDL-C与2型糖尿病呈非线性u型相关,与前驱糖尿病呈s型相关。与一致性受试者相比,不协调低RC人群的2型糖尿病发病率较低,而不协调高RC人群的2型糖尿病和前驱糖尿病发病率较高。当临床LDL-C截止值为2.60 mmol/L时,高LDL-C和低RC组的参与者患2型糖尿病的几率最低,而低LDL-C和高RC组的参与者患2型糖尿病的几率最高。LDL-C和RC不一致与年龄、MetS和降脂药物等因素之间的显著相互作用与2型糖尿病的发病率有关。研究发现,在非糖尿病人群中,RC介导了腹部肥胖与2型糖尿病之间15.86%的关联,介导了腹部肥胖与前驱糖尿病之间16.22%的关联。结论:不一致的高RC与较高的2型糖尿病和前驱糖尿病的几率相关,而不一致的低RC与较低的2型糖尿病的几率相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Association between remnant cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol discordance and type 2 diabetes or prediabetes: results from NHANES.

Objective: There is limited evidence on the relationship between remnant cholesterol (RC) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) discordance and type 2 diabetes or prediabetes. This study aimed to investigate the association between RC and LDL-C discordance and type 2 diabetes or prediabetes in the general US adult population.

Methods: Data from 19,604 participants in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES) (2005-2018) were analyzed. The percentile difference between RC and LDL-C was used to define discordance. Logistic regression models were performed to assess the relationships between RC, LDL-C, RC and LDL-C percentile difference, LDL-C and RC discordant. Nonlinear relationships were explored using restricted cubic splines. Mediation analysis was conducted to evaluate the direct and indirect relationships between abdominal obesity and type 2 diabetes through RC.

Results: RC was non-linearly and J-shaped correlated with type 2 diabetes and prediabetes, whereas LDL-C was non-linearly and U-shaped correlated with type 2 diabetes and was S-shaped correlated with prediabetes. Compared to concordant participants, those with discordantly low RC population had lower type 2 diabetes odds, while those with the discordantly high RC population had higher type 2 diabetes and prediabetes odds. When a clinical LDL-C cut-off of 2.60 mmol/L was applied, participants in the high LDL-C and low RC group had the lowest odds of type 2 diabetes, while those in the low LDL-C and high RC group had the highest odds. Significant interactions between LDL-C and RC discordance and factors such as age, MetS, and lipid-lowering medications were observed in relation to type 2 diabetes odds. RC was found to mediate 15.86% of the association between abdominal obesity and type 2 diabetes, and 16.22% of the association between abdominal obesity and prediabetes in the non-diabetes population.

Conclusions: Discordantly high RC was associated with higher odds of type 2 diabetes and prediabetes, while discordantly low RC was associated with lower odds of type 2 diabetes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Endocrine Disorders
BMC Endocrine Disorders ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
280
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Endocrine Disorders is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of endocrine disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信