基于心理治疗史的自恋五因素短表测量不变性

IF 3.5 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Melissa Packer West, Joshua D Miller, Donald R Lynam
{"title":"基于心理治疗史的自恋五因素短表测量不变性","authors":"Melissa Packer West, Joshua D Miller, Donald R Lynam","doi":"10.1177/10731911251349020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Five-Factor Narcissism Inventory-Short Form (FFNI-SF) is the only extant scale that efficiently measures narcissism at the three-factor level (antagonism, agentic extraversion, and narcissistic neuroticism). Individuals with significant narcissistic dysfunction are frequently seen in clinical settings. However, there has been limited testing of measurement invariance (MI) in narcissism measures, especially multifaceted ones, across clinical and nonclinical groups. This study examined whether the FFNI-SF operates equivalently across individuals with and without a psychological treatment history. Using exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM), we tested MI at four levels-configural, metric, scalar, and residual-in 473 community participants, 36% of whom had a psychological treatment history, current and/or lifetime. Results indicated scalar and residual invariance, suggesting that the FFNI-SF is valid for comparing narcissism traits at both the latent and observed score levels between treatment history groups. Latent mean comparisons revealed that individuals with a treatment history scored significantly lower on antagonism and higher on neuroticism compared to those without a treatment history. These findings highlight that narcissism's underlying dimensions may manifest differently in clinical samples and support the FFNI-SF as a viable multidimensional measure for capturing nuanced expressions of narcissistic traits across clinical and nonclinical contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":8577,"journal":{"name":"Assessment","volume":" ","pages":"10731911251349020"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measurement Invariance of the Five-Factor Narcissism Inventory-Short Form According to Psychological Treatment History.\",\"authors\":\"Melissa Packer West, Joshua D Miller, Donald R Lynam\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10731911251349020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The Five-Factor Narcissism Inventory-Short Form (FFNI-SF) is the only extant scale that efficiently measures narcissism at the three-factor level (antagonism, agentic extraversion, and narcissistic neuroticism). Individuals with significant narcissistic dysfunction are frequently seen in clinical settings. However, there has been limited testing of measurement invariance (MI) in narcissism measures, especially multifaceted ones, across clinical and nonclinical groups. This study examined whether the FFNI-SF operates equivalently across individuals with and without a psychological treatment history. Using exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM), we tested MI at four levels-configural, metric, scalar, and residual-in 473 community participants, 36% of whom had a psychological treatment history, current and/or lifetime. Results indicated scalar and residual invariance, suggesting that the FFNI-SF is valid for comparing narcissism traits at both the latent and observed score levels between treatment history groups. Latent mean comparisons revealed that individuals with a treatment history scored significantly lower on antagonism and higher on neuroticism compared to those without a treatment history. These findings highlight that narcissism's underlying dimensions may manifest differently in clinical samples and support the FFNI-SF as a viable multidimensional measure for capturing nuanced expressions of narcissistic traits across clinical and nonclinical contexts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8577,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Assessment\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"10731911251349020\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Assessment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911251349020\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911251349020","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

五因素自恋量表(FFNI-SF)是目前唯一一种在三因素水平(对抗、代理外向和自恋神经质)上有效测量自恋的量表。有明显自恋功能障碍的个体在临床环境中很常见。然而,在临床和非临床群体中,对自恋测量的测量不变性(MI)的测试有限,尤其是多方面的测量。本研究考察了FFNI-SF在有和没有心理治疗史的个体中是否同样有效。使用探索性结构方程模型(ESEM),我们在473名社区参与者中测试了四个水平的MI -构形,度量,标量和残差,其中36%的人有心理治疗史,当前和/或一生。结果显示标量和残差不变性,表明FFNI-SF在治疗史组之间的潜在和观察评分水平上都是有效的。潜在平均比较显示,与没有治疗史的个体相比,有治疗史的个体在拮抗性上得分明显较低,在神经质上得分较高。这些发现强调了自恋的潜在维度可能在临床样本中表现不同,并支持FFNI-SF作为一种可行的多维测量方法,用于捕捉临床和非临床背景下自恋特征的细微表达。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Measurement Invariance of the Five-Factor Narcissism Inventory-Short Form According to Psychological Treatment History.

The Five-Factor Narcissism Inventory-Short Form (FFNI-SF) is the only extant scale that efficiently measures narcissism at the three-factor level (antagonism, agentic extraversion, and narcissistic neuroticism). Individuals with significant narcissistic dysfunction are frequently seen in clinical settings. However, there has been limited testing of measurement invariance (MI) in narcissism measures, especially multifaceted ones, across clinical and nonclinical groups. This study examined whether the FFNI-SF operates equivalently across individuals with and without a psychological treatment history. Using exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM), we tested MI at four levels-configural, metric, scalar, and residual-in 473 community participants, 36% of whom had a psychological treatment history, current and/or lifetime. Results indicated scalar and residual invariance, suggesting that the FFNI-SF is valid for comparing narcissism traits at both the latent and observed score levels between treatment history groups. Latent mean comparisons revealed that individuals with a treatment history scored significantly lower on antagonism and higher on neuroticism compared to those without a treatment history. These findings highlight that narcissism's underlying dimensions may manifest differently in clinical samples and support the FFNI-SF as a viable multidimensional measure for capturing nuanced expressions of narcissistic traits across clinical and nonclinical contexts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Assessment
Assessment PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
2.60%
发文量
86
期刊介绍: Assessment publishes articles in the domain of applied clinical assessment. The emphasis of this journal is on publication of information of relevance to the use of assessment measures, including test development, validation, and interpretation practices. The scope of the journal includes research that can inform assessment practices in mental health, forensic, medical, and other applied settings. Papers that focus on the assessment of cognitive and neuropsychological functioning, personality, and psychopathology are invited. Most papers published in Assessment report the results of original empirical research, however integrative review articles and scholarly case studies will also be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信