中/低位直肠癌保括约肌直肠切除术后吻合口瘘的危险因素及肿瘤影响:日本的一项多机构队列研究

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Annals of Surgical Oncology Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-07 DOI:10.1245/s10434-025-17763-2
Kentaro Ochiai, Koya Hida, Tomohiro Yamaguchi, Meiki Fukuda, Tomonori Akagi, Takashi Akiyoshi, Ryosuke Okamura, Seiichiro Yamamoto, Takeshi Naitoh, Tsuyoshi Konishi
{"title":"中/低位直肠癌保括约肌直肠切除术后吻合口瘘的危险因素及肿瘤影响:日本的一项多机构队列研究","authors":"Kentaro Ochiai, Koya Hida, Tomohiro Yamaguchi, Meiki Fukuda, Tomonori Akagi, Takashi Akiyoshi, Ryosuke Okamura, Seiichiro Yamamoto, Takeshi Naitoh, Tsuyoshi Konishi","doi":"10.1245/s10434-025-17763-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Anastomotic leakage after sphincter-preserving proctectomy is a serious postoperative complication. It is unclear whether diverting ostomy prevents anastomotic leakage, and whether anastomotic leakage worsens long-term oncologic outcomes.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Data from patients with stage II-III mid/low rectal cancer who underwent sphincter-preserving proctectomy between January 2010 and December 2011 were retrospectively analyzed using a multicenter database from 69 institutions. Factors associated with anastomotic leakage and its influence on oncologic outcomes were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 922 patients were included. Anastomotic leakage was diagnosed in 125 patients (13.6%). Anastomotic leakage was associated with increased reoperations (29.6% vs. 1.0%, p < 0.0001), longer hospital stays (median 34 days vs. 15 days, p < 0.0001), and more frequent permanent ostomy (20.8% vs. 11.0%, p = 0.002). Multivariable analysis revealed that absence of diverting ostomy (odds ratio 2.46, 95% confidential interval 1.59-3.85, p = 0.0004) and male sex (odds ratio 2.54, 95% confidence interval 1.58-4.26, p = 0.001) were independently associated with an increased risk of anastomotic leakage. The risk reduction with diverting ostomy was observed in both sexes in interaction term analysis. Anastomotic leakage was associated with an increased risk of local recurrence in patients with pathologic stage III disease (hazard ratio 2.11, 95% confidence interval 1.08-4.14, p = 0.03) but was not associated with overall or recurrence-free survival.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Absence of diverting ostomy and male sex were risk factors for anastomotic leakage, and anastomotic leakage was associated with increased local recurrence in patients with stage III disease. These findings support the practice of protective diversion after sphincter-preserving proctectomy in patients with mid/low rectal cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":8229,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Surgical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"7315-7325"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk Factors for and Oncologic Impact of Anastomotic Leakage After Sphincter-Preserving Proctectomy for Mid/Low Rectal Cancer: A Multi-institutional Cohort Study in Japan.\",\"authors\":\"Kentaro Ochiai, Koya Hida, Tomohiro Yamaguchi, Meiki Fukuda, Tomonori Akagi, Takashi Akiyoshi, Ryosuke Okamura, Seiichiro Yamamoto, Takeshi Naitoh, Tsuyoshi Konishi\",\"doi\":\"10.1245/s10434-025-17763-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Anastomotic leakage after sphincter-preserving proctectomy is a serious postoperative complication. It is unclear whether diverting ostomy prevents anastomotic leakage, and whether anastomotic leakage worsens long-term oncologic outcomes.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Data from patients with stage II-III mid/low rectal cancer who underwent sphincter-preserving proctectomy between January 2010 and December 2011 were retrospectively analyzed using a multicenter database from 69 institutions. Factors associated with anastomotic leakage and its influence on oncologic outcomes were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 922 patients were included. Anastomotic leakage was diagnosed in 125 patients (13.6%). Anastomotic leakage was associated with increased reoperations (29.6% vs. 1.0%, p < 0.0001), longer hospital stays (median 34 days vs. 15 days, p < 0.0001), and more frequent permanent ostomy (20.8% vs. 11.0%, p = 0.002). Multivariable analysis revealed that absence of diverting ostomy (odds ratio 2.46, 95% confidential interval 1.59-3.85, p = 0.0004) and male sex (odds ratio 2.54, 95% confidence interval 1.58-4.26, p = 0.001) were independently associated with an increased risk of anastomotic leakage. The risk reduction with diverting ostomy was observed in both sexes in interaction term analysis. Anastomotic leakage was associated with an increased risk of local recurrence in patients with pathologic stage III disease (hazard ratio 2.11, 95% confidence interval 1.08-4.14, p = 0.03) but was not associated with overall or recurrence-free survival.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Absence of diverting ostomy and male sex were risk factors for anastomotic leakage, and anastomotic leakage was associated with increased local recurrence in patients with stage III disease. These findings support the practice of protective diversion after sphincter-preserving proctectomy in patients with mid/low rectal cancer.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8229,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Surgical Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"7315-7325\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Surgical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-025-17763-2\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-025-17763-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:保括约肌直肠切除术后吻合口漏是一种严重的术后并发症。目前尚不清楚转移造口术是否能预防吻合口漏,以及吻合口漏是否会恶化长期的肿瘤预后。患者和方法:对2010年1月至2011年12月期间接受保留括约肌直结肠切除术的II-III期中/低位直肠癌患者的数据进行回顾性分析,使用来自69个机构的多中心数据库。评价吻合口瘘相关因素及其对肿瘤预后的影响。结果:共纳入922例患者。吻合口漏125例(13.6%)。吻合口漏与再手术增加(29.6%对1.0%,p < 0.0001)、住院时间延长(中位34天对15天,p < 0.0001)和永久性造口手术更频繁(20.8%对11.0%,p = 0.002)相关。多变量分析显示,未行分流造口术(优势比2.46,95%可信区间1.59 ~ 3.85,p = 0.0004)和男性(优势比2.54,95%可信区间1.58 ~ 4.26,p = 0.001)与吻合口瘘风险增加独立相关。在相互作用项分析中,男女均观察到转移造口术的风险降低。吻合口漏与病理性III期疾病患者局部复发风险增加相关(风险比2.11,95%可信区间1.08-4.14,p = 0.03),但与总生存率或无复发生存率无关。结论:未行分流造口术和男性是发生吻合口瘘的危险因素,吻合口瘘与III期疾病患者局部复发率增加有关。这些发现支持了中/低位直肠癌患者在保留括约肌的直肠切除术后进行保护性分流的做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Risk Factors for and Oncologic Impact of Anastomotic Leakage After Sphincter-Preserving Proctectomy for Mid/Low Rectal Cancer: A Multi-institutional Cohort Study in Japan.

Background: Anastomotic leakage after sphincter-preserving proctectomy is a serious postoperative complication. It is unclear whether diverting ostomy prevents anastomotic leakage, and whether anastomotic leakage worsens long-term oncologic outcomes.

Patients and methods: Data from patients with stage II-III mid/low rectal cancer who underwent sphincter-preserving proctectomy between January 2010 and December 2011 were retrospectively analyzed using a multicenter database from 69 institutions. Factors associated with anastomotic leakage and its influence on oncologic outcomes were evaluated.

Results: A total of 922 patients were included. Anastomotic leakage was diagnosed in 125 patients (13.6%). Anastomotic leakage was associated with increased reoperations (29.6% vs. 1.0%, p < 0.0001), longer hospital stays (median 34 days vs. 15 days, p < 0.0001), and more frequent permanent ostomy (20.8% vs. 11.0%, p = 0.002). Multivariable analysis revealed that absence of diverting ostomy (odds ratio 2.46, 95% confidential interval 1.59-3.85, p = 0.0004) and male sex (odds ratio 2.54, 95% confidence interval 1.58-4.26, p = 0.001) were independently associated with an increased risk of anastomotic leakage. The risk reduction with diverting ostomy was observed in both sexes in interaction term analysis. Anastomotic leakage was associated with an increased risk of local recurrence in patients with pathologic stage III disease (hazard ratio 2.11, 95% confidence interval 1.08-4.14, p = 0.03) but was not associated with overall or recurrence-free survival.

Conclusions: Absence of diverting ostomy and male sex were risk factors for anastomotic leakage, and anastomotic leakage was associated with increased local recurrence in patients with stage III disease. These findings support the practice of protective diversion after sphincter-preserving proctectomy in patients with mid/low rectal cancer.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
10.80%
发文量
1698
审稿时长
2.8 months
期刊介绍: The Annals of Surgical Oncology is the official journal of The Society of Surgical Oncology and is published for the Society by Springer. The Annals publishes original and educational manuscripts about oncology for surgeons from all specialities in academic and community settings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信