高蛋白和低蛋白豌豆基因型:分离蛋白理化、功能和品质特性的比较研究

IF 2.2 4区 农林科学 Q3 CHEMISTRY, APPLIED
Cassia Galves, Krishna Kishore Gali, Thomas D. Warkentin, James House, Michael Nickerson
{"title":"高蛋白和低蛋白豌豆基因型:分离蛋白理化、功能和品质特性的比较研究","authors":"Cassia Galves,&nbsp;Krishna Kishore Gali,&nbsp;Thomas D. Warkentin,&nbsp;James House,&nbsp;Michael Nickerson","doi":"10.1002/cche.10889","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background and Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>This study evaluated the effect of seed protein content on the composition, physicochemical, functional, and quality properties of pea protein isolates recovered through alkaline extraction/isoelectric precipitation. Samples were divided into three high-protein lines (HPL), three low-protein lines (LPL), and one control (medium protein).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Findings</h3>\n \n <p>Isolates derived from HPLs had higher protein (92.4%–94.5%) compared to LPLs (79.9%–88.7%) and the control (~92%). The protein content was significantly correlated to the legumin/vicilin ratio (1.0–1.8), surface charge (−38 to −23 mV), and surface tension (49–52.7 mN/m). No significant correlation was observed between protein content and functionality. Minor variation was observed for emulsifying (17.7–22.1 m<sup>2</sup>/g) and foaming (160%–215%) properties. LPLs presented higher amino acid score (0.83), and In Vitro protein digestibility corrected amino acid score (~0.72) than HPLs (~0.72 and ~0.64, respectively). Protein digestibility was in the range of ~87% for all lines.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Seed protein concentration impacted the pea protein isolates' proximate composition, quality, and physicochemical/surface properties. HPLs presented higher total protein content and LPLs presenting overall higher protein quality, whereas functionality did not differ significantly between HPLs versus LPLs.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Significance and Novelty</h3>\n \n <p>Our findings highlight the importance of sourcing and selecting pea lines tailored to specific applications, with a trade-off between protein quantity versus quality.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":9807,"journal":{"name":"Cereal Chemistry","volume":"102 4","pages":"697-710"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cche.10889","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"High- and Low-Protein Pea Genotypes: A Comparative Study of the Physicochemical, Functional, and Quality Properties of Protein Isolates\",\"authors\":\"Cassia Galves,&nbsp;Krishna Kishore Gali,&nbsp;Thomas D. Warkentin,&nbsp;James House,&nbsp;Michael Nickerson\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cche.10889\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background and Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study evaluated the effect of seed protein content on the composition, physicochemical, functional, and quality properties of pea protein isolates recovered through alkaline extraction/isoelectric precipitation. Samples were divided into three high-protein lines (HPL), three low-protein lines (LPL), and one control (medium protein).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Findings</h3>\\n \\n <p>Isolates derived from HPLs had higher protein (92.4%–94.5%) compared to LPLs (79.9%–88.7%) and the control (~92%). The protein content was significantly correlated to the legumin/vicilin ratio (1.0–1.8), surface charge (−38 to −23 mV), and surface tension (49–52.7 mN/m). No significant correlation was observed between protein content and functionality. Minor variation was observed for emulsifying (17.7–22.1 m<sup>2</sup>/g) and foaming (160%–215%) properties. LPLs presented higher amino acid score (0.83), and In Vitro protein digestibility corrected amino acid score (~0.72) than HPLs (~0.72 and ~0.64, respectively). Protein digestibility was in the range of ~87% for all lines.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Seed protein concentration impacted the pea protein isolates' proximate composition, quality, and physicochemical/surface properties. HPLs presented higher total protein content and LPLs presenting overall higher protein quality, whereas functionality did not differ significantly between HPLs versus LPLs.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Significance and Novelty</h3>\\n \\n <p>Our findings highlight the importance of sourcing and selecting pea lines tailored to specific applications, with a trade-off between protein quantity versus quality.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9807,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cereal Chemistry\",\"volume\":\"102 4\",\"pages\":\"697-710\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cche.10889\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cereal Chemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cche.10889\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cereal Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cche.10889","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的通过碱性提取/等电沉淀法,研究了豌豆种子蛋白含量对豌豆分离蛋白组成、理化性质、功能及品质的影响。样品分为3个高蛋白系(HPL)、3个低蛋白系(LPL)和1个对照(中蛋白)。结果hpl分离株的蛋白含量(92.4% ~ 94.5%)高于lpl(79.9% ~ 88.7%)和对照组(~92%)。蛋白含量与豆豆蛋白/绒毛蛋白比(1.0 ~ 1.8)、表面电荷(−38 ~−23 mV)和表面张力(49 ~ 52.7 mN/m)显著相关。蛋白质含量与功能之间无显著相关性。乳化性能(17.7 ~ 22.1 m2/g)和发泡性能(160% ~ 215%)变化不大。lpl的氨基酸评分(0.83)和体外蛋白质消化率校正氨基酸评分(~0.72)均高于hpl(分别为~0.72和~0.64)。所有品系的蛋白质消化率均在~87%范围内。结论种子蛋白浓度影响豌豆分离蛋白的近似组成、质量和理化/表面性质。HPLs具有更高的总蛋白质含量,而lpl具有更高的整体蛋白质质量,而功能在hpl和lpl之间没有显着差异。我们的研究结果强调了采购和选择适合特定应用的豌豆品系的重要性,并在蛋白质数量与质量之间进行权衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

High- and Low-Protein Pea Genotypes: A Comparative Study of the Physicochemical, Functional, and Quality Properties of Protein Isolates

High- and Low-Protein Pea Genotypes: A Comparative Study of the Physicochemical, Functional, and Quality Properties of Protein Isolates

Background and Objectives

This study evaluated the effect of seed protein content on the composition, physicochemical, functional, and quality properties of pea protein isolates recovered through alkaline extraction/isoelectric precipitation. Samples were divided into three high-protein lines (HPL), three low-protein lines (LPL), and one control (medium protein).

Findings

Isolates derived from HPLs had higher protein (92.4%–94.5%) compared to LPLs (79.9%–88.7%) and the control (~92%). The protein content was significantly correlated to the legumin/vicilin ratio (1.0–1.8), surface charge (−38 to −23 mV), and surface tension (49–52.7 mN/m). No significant correlation was observed between protein content and functionality. Minor variation was observed for emulsifying (17.7–22.1 m2/g) and foaming (160%–215%) properties. LPLs presented higher amino acid score (0.83), and In Vitro protein digestibility corrected amino acid score (~0.72) than HPLs (~0.72 and ~0.64, respectively). Protein digestibility was in the range of ~87% for all lines.

Conclusions

Seed protein concentration impacted the pea protein isolates' proximate composition, quality, and physicochemical/surface properties. HPLs presented higher total protein content and LPLs presenting overall higher protein quality, whereas functionality did not differ significantly between HPLs versus LPLs.

Significance and Novelty

Our findings highlight the importance of sourcing and selecting pea lines tailored to specific applications, with a trade-off between protein quantity versus quality.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cereal Chemistry
Cereal Chemistry 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
110
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Cereal Chemistry publishes high-quality papers reporting novel research and significant conceptual advances in genetics, biotechnology, composition, processing, and utili­zation of cereal grains (barley, maize, millet, oats, rice, rye, sorghum, triticale, and wheat), pulses (beans, lentils, peas, etc.), oil­seeds, and specialty crops (amaranth, flax, quinoa, etc.). Papers advancing grain science in relation to health, nutrition, pet and animal food, and safety, along with new methodologies, instrumentation, and analysis relating to these areas are welcome, as are research notes and topical review papers. The journal generally does not accept papers that focus on nongrain ingredients, technology of a commercial or proprietary nature, or that confirm previous research without extending knowledge. Papers that describe product development should include discussion of underlying theoretical principles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信