Cassia Galves, Krishna Kishore Gali, Thomas D. Warkentin, James House, Michael Nickerson
{"title":"高蛋白和低蛋白豌豆基因型:分离蛋白理化、功能和品质特性的比较研究","authors":"Cassia Galves, Krishna Kishore Gali, Thomas D. Warkentin, James House, Michael Nickerson","doi":"10.1002/cche.10889","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background and Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>This study evaluated the effect of seed protein content on the composition, physicochemical, functional, and quality properties of pea protein isolates recovered through alkaline extraction/isoelectric precipitation. Samples were divided into three high-protein lines (HPL), three low-protein lines (LPL), and one control (medium protein).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Findings</h3>\n \n <p>Isolates derived from HPLs had higher protein (92.4%–94.5%) compared to LPLs (79.9%–88.7%) and the control (~92%). The protein content was significantly correlated to the legumin/vicilin ratio (1.0–1.8), surface charge (−38 to −23 mV), and surface tension (49–52.7 mN/m). No significant correlation was observed between protein content and functionality. Minor variation was observed for emulsifying (17.7–22.1 m<sup>2</sup>/g) and foaming (160%–215%) properties. LPLs presented higher amino acid score (0.83), and In Vitro protein digestibility corrected amino acid score (~0.72) than HPLs (~0.72 and ~0.64, respectively). Protein digestibility was in the range of ~87% for all lines.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Seed protein concentration impacted the pea protein isolates' proximate composition, quality, and physicochemical/surface properties. HPLs presented higher total protein content and LPLs presenting overall higher protein quality, whereas functionality did not differ significantly between HPLs versus LPLs.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Significance and Novelty</h3>\n \n <p>Our findings highlight the importance of sourcing and selecting pea lines tailored to specific applications, with a trade-off between protein quantity versus quality.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":9807,"journal":{"name":"Cereal Chemistry","volume":"102 4","pages":"697-710"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cche.10889","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"High- and Low-Protein Pea Genotypes: A Comparative Study of the Physicochemical, Functional, and Quality Properties of Protein Isolates\",\"authors\":\"Cassia Galves, Krishna Kishore Gali, Thomas D. Warkentin, James House, Michael Nickerson\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cche.10889\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background and Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study evaluated the effect of seed protein content on the composition, physicochemical, functional, and quality properties of pea protein isolates recovered through alkaline extraction/isoelectric precipitation. Samples were divided into three high-protein lines (HPL), three low-protein lines (LPL), and one control (medium protein).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Findings</h3>\\n \\n <p>Isolates derived from HPLs had higher protein (92.4%–94.5%) compared to LPLs (79.9%–88.7%) and the control (~92%). The protein content was significantly correlated to the legumin/vicilin ratio (1.0–1.8), surface charge (−38 to −23 mV), and surface tension (49–52.7 mN/m). No significant correlation was observed between protein content and functionality. Minor variation was observed for emulsifying (17.7–22.1 m<sup>2</sup>/g) and foaming (160%–215%) properties. LPLs presented higher amino acid score (0.83), and In Vitro protein digestibility corrected amino acid score (~0.72) than HPLs (~0.72 and ~0.64, respectively). Protein digestibility was in the range of ~87% for all lines.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Seed protein concentration impacted the pea protein isolates' proximate composition, quality, and physicochemical/surface properties. HPLs presented higher total protein content and LPLs presenting overall higher protein quality, whereas functionality did not differ significantly between HPLs versus LPLs.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Significance and Novelty</h3>\\n \\n <p>Our findings highlight the importance of sourcing and selecting pea lines tailored to specific applications, with a trade-off between protein quantity versus quality.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9807,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cereal Chemistry\",\"volume\":\"102 4\",\"pages\":\"697-710\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cche.10889\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cereal Chemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cche.10889\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cereal Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cche.10889","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
High- and Low-Protein Pea Genotypes: A Comparative Study of the Physicochemical, Functional, and Quality Properties of Protein Isolates
Background and Objectives
This study evaluated the effect of seed protein content on the composition, physicochemical, functional, and quality properties of pea protein isolates recovered through alkaline extraction/isoelectric precipitation. Samples were divided into three high-protein lines (HPL), three low-protein lines (LPL), and one control (medium protein).
Findings
Isolates derived from HPLs had higher protein (92.4%–94.5%) compared to LPLs (79.9%–88.7%) and the control (~92%). The protein content was significantly correlated to the legumin/vicilin ratio (1.0–1.8), surface charge (−38 to −23 mV), and surface tension (49–52.7 mN/m). No significant correlation was observed between protein content and functionality. Minor variation was observed for emulsifying (17.7–22.1 m2/g) and foaming (160%–215%) properties. LPLs presented higher amino acid score (0.83), and In Vitro protein digestibility corrected amino acid score (~0.72) than HPLs (~0.72 and ~0.64, respectively). Protein digestibility was in the range of ~87% for all lines.
Conclusions
Seed protein concentration impacted the pea protein isolates' proximate composition, quality, and physicochemical/surface properties. HPLs presented higher total protein content and LPLs presenting overall higher protein quality, whereas functionality did not differ significantly between HPLs versus LPLs.
Significance and Novelty
Our findings highlight the importance of sourcing and selecting pea lines tailored to specific applications, with a trade-off between protein quantity versus quality.
期刊介绍:
Cereal Chemistry publishes high-quality papers reporting novel research and significant conceptual advances in genetics, biotechnology, composition, processing, and utilization of cereal grains (barley, maize, millet, oats, rice, rye, sorghum, triticale, and wheat), pulses (beans, lentils, peas, etc.), oilseeds, and specialty crops (amaranth, flax, quinoa, etc.). Papers advancing grain science in relation to health, nutrition, pet and animal food, and safety, along with new methodologies, instrumentation, and analysis relating to these areas are welcome, as are research notes and topical review papers.
The journal generally does not accept papers that focus on nongrain ingredients, technology of a commercial or proprietary nature, or that confirm previous research without extending knowledge. Papers that describe product development should include discussion of underlying theoretical principles.