从叠前地震资料中提取可靠密度比的算法。第1部分:理论

IF 1.8 3区 地球科学 Q3 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
Ivan Lehocki, Tapan Mukerji, Per Avseth, Erling Hugo Jensen
{"title":"从叠前地震资料中提取可靠密度比的算法。第1部分:理论","authors":"Ivan Lehocki,&nbsp;Tapan Mukerji,&nbsp;Per Avseth,&nbsp;Erling Hugo Jensen","doi":"10.1111/1365-2478.70029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We have developed two inversion schemes for probabilistic calculation of density ratio across a reflecting interface from P-to-P wave reflectivity by algebraically inverting Zoeppritz's equation. The density ratio is an attribute that can be directly linked to hydrocarbon saturation. The probabilistic approach helps to model uncertainties in the calculated parameter. The methods are free of empiricism. Contrary to conventional wisdom, we show that ultra-far amplitude variation with offset (AVO) data are not required for the inversion of the density ratio parameter. As a matter of fact, with our schemes, it is advisable to restrict the inversion to near-far angle ranges to minimize the impact of the amplitude-distorting phenomena that (strongly) invalidate the assumptions woven into the derivation of the P-to-P Zoeppritz equation. Moreover, we demonstrate that this equation is suitable for density ratio inversion. The first inversion scheme to predict the density ratio involves repeatedly solving a 12th-degree polynomial equation across various incident angles. The most frequent value in the distribution of solutions serves as the best estimate. The second scheme solves a 5th-degree polynomial equation for the squared <i>V</i><sub>P</sub>/<i>V</i><sub>S</sub> ratio of layer 2 (in a two-layered earth model), also at an arbitrary number of incident angles. The range of the angles used in the inversion can, in principle, be freely selected. The most likely density ratio estimate is obtained as a byproduct of the calculation. We tested the methods on a synthetic example. Both schemes predict the density ratio within one standard deviation of the actual value from near-far angle seismic reflection data. Moreover, the two inversion schemes were compared, showing that <i>Loris</i>, which requires repetitive solving of 12th-degree polynomial equations, is computationally more expensive than <i>Lemur</i>, which solves a 5th-degree polynomial equation. Despite both methods achieving accurate density ratio estimates, <i>Lemur</i>’s computational efficiency makes it the preferred choice for large datasets. This paper is the first part of a two-part study on density ratio inversion methods. Here, we focus on the theoretical foundations of the <i>Loris</i> and <i>Lemur</i> inversion approaches and validate them through synthetic tests. In Part 2, we extend this work by applying the methods to real seismic data and evaluating their performance in a practical exploration setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":12793,"journal":{"name":"Geophysical Prospecting","volume":"73 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Algorithms for extraction of reliable density ratios from pre-stack seismic data—Part 1: Theory\",\"authors\":\"Ivan Lehocki,&nbsp;Tapan Mukerji,&nbsp;Per Avseth,&nbsp;Erling Hugo Jensen\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1365-2478.70029\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>We have developed two inversion schemes for probabilistic calculation of density ratio across a reflecting interface from P-to-P wave reflectivity by algebraically inverting Zoeppritz's equation. The density ratio is an attribute that can be directly linked to hydrocarbon saturation. The probabilistic approach helps to model uncertainties in the calculated parameter. The methods are free of empiricism. Contrary to conventional wisdom, we show that ultra-far amplitude variation with offset (AVO) data are not required for the inversion of the density ratio parameter. As a matter of fact, with our schemes, it is advisable to restrict the inversion to near-far angle ranges to minimize the impact of the amplitude-distorting phenomena that (strongly) invalidate the assumptions woven into the derivation of the P-to-P Zoeppritz equation. Moreover, we demonstrate that this equation is suitable for density ratio inversion. The first inversion scheme to predict the density ratio involves repeatedly solving a 12th-degree polynomial equation across various incident angles. The most frequent value in the distribution of solutions serves as the best estimate. The second scheme solves a 5th-degree polynomial equation for the squared <i>V</i><sub>P</sub>/<i>V</i><sub>S</sub> ratio of layer 2 (in a two-layered earth model), also at an arbitrary number of incident angles. The range of the angles used in the inversion can, in principle, be freely selected. The most likely density ratio estimate is obtained as a byproduct of the calculation. We tested the methods on a synthetic example. Both schemes predict the density ratio within one standard deviation of the actual value from near-far angle seismic reflection data. Moreover, the two inversion schemes were compared, showing that <i>Loris</i>, which requires repetitive solving of 12th-degree polynomial equations, is computationally more expensive than <i>Lemur</i>, which solves a 5th-degree polynomial equation. Despite both methods achieving accurate density ratio estimates, <i>Lemur</i>’s computational efficiency makes it the preferred choice for large datasets. This paper is the first part of a two-part study on density ratio inversion methods. Here, we focus on the theoretical foundations of the <i>Loris</i> and <i>Lemur</i> inversion approaches and validate them through synthetic tests. In Part 2, we extend this work by applying the methods to real seismic data and evaluating their performance in a practical exploration setting.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12793,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geophysical Prospecting\",\"volume\":\"73 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geophysical Prospecting\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1365-2478.70029\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geophysical Prospecting","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1365-2478.70029","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

通过对Zoeppritz方程进行代数反演,我们开发了两种基于p - p波反射率的反射界面密度比概率计算的反演方案。密度比是一个与油气饱和度直接相关的属性。概率方法有助于对计算参数中的不确定性进行建模。这些方法没有经验主义。与传统观点相反,我们表明,密度比参数的反演不需要带偏移量(AVO)数据的超远振幅变化。事实上,在我们的方案中,建议将反演限制在近远角度范围内,以尽量减少幅度扭曲现象的影响,这种现象(强烈地)使P-to-P Zoeppritz方程推导中的假设失效。此外,我们还证明了该方程适用于密度比反演。第一种预测密度比的反演方案涉及在不同入射角上反复求解一个12次多项式方程。解决方案分布中最常见的值作为最佳估计值。第二种方案解决了第2层(在双层地球模型中)VP/VS比值平方的5次多项式方程,也是在任意数量的入射角下。用于反演的角度范围原则上可以自由选择。最可能的密度比估计是作为计算的副产品获得的。我们在一个综合实例上测试了这些方法。两种方案都能在近远角地震反射数据的实际值的一个标准差范围内预测密度比。此外,对比两种反演方案,发现需要重复求解12次多项式方程的Loris比求解5次多项式方程的Lemur计算成本更高。尽管这两种方法都能获得精确的密度比估计,但Lemur的计算效率使其成为大型数据集的首选。本文是密度比反演方法两部分研究的第一部分。本文重点介绍了Loris和Lemur反演方法的理论基础,并通过综合测试对其进行了验证。在第二部分中,我们通过将方法应用于实际地震数据并评估其在实际勘探环境中的性能来扩展这项工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Algorithms for extraction of reliable density ratios from pre-stack seismic data—Part 1: Theory

We have developed two inversion schemes for probabilistic calculation of density ratio across a reflecting interface from P-to-P wave reflectivity by algebraically inverting Zoeppritz's equation. The density ratio is an attribute that can be directly linked to hydrocarbon saturation. The probabilistic approach helps to model uncertainties in the calculated parameter. The methods are free of empiricism. Contrary to conventional wisdom, we show that ultra-far amplitude variation with offset (AVO) data are not required for the inversion of the density ratio parameter. As a matter of fact, with our schemes, it is advisable to restrict the inversion to near-far angle ranges to minimize the impact of the amplitude-distorting phenomena that (strongly) invalidate the assumptions woven into the derivation of the P-to-P Zoeppritz equation. Moreover, we demonstrate that this equation is suitable for density ratio inversion. The first inversion scheme to predict the density ratio involves repeatedly solving a 12th-degree polynomial equation across various incident angles. The most frequent value in the distribution of solutions serves as the best estimate. The second scheme solves a 5th-degree polynomial equation for the squared VP/VS ratio of layer 2 (in a two-layered earth model), also at an arbitrary number of incident angles. The range of the angles used in the inversion can, in principle, be freely selected. The most likely density ratio estimate is obtained as a byproduct of the calculation. We tested the methods on a synthetic example. Both schemes predict the density ratio within one standard deviation of the actual value from near-far angle seismic reflection data. Moreover, the two inversion schemes were compared, showing that Loris, which requires repetitive solving of 12th-degree polynomial equations, is computationally more expensive than Lemur, which solves a 5th-degree polynomial equation. Despite both methods achieving accurate density ratio estimates, Lemur’s computational efficiency makes it the preferred choice for large datasets. This paper is the first part of a two-part study on density ratio inversion methods. Here, we focus on the theoretical foundations of the Loris and Lemur inversion approaches and validate them through synthetic tests. In Part 2, we extend this work by applying the methods to real seismic data and evaluating their performance in a practical exploration setting.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Geophysical Prospecting
Geophysical Prospecting 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
11.50%
发文量
118
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: Geophysical Prospecting publishes the best in primary research on the science of geophysics as it applies to the exploration, evaluation and extraction of earth resources. Drawing heavily on contributions from researchers in the oil and mineral exploration industries, the journal has a very practical slant. Although the journal provides a valuable forum for communication among workers in these fields, it is also ideally suited to researchers in academic geophysics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信