三维患者脑血流模型:动脉顺应性和威利斯环结构的影响

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
L. A. Mansilla Alvarez, G. D. Maso Talou, R. A. Feijóo, P. J. Blanco
{"title":"三维患者脑血流模型:动脉顺应性和威利斯环结构的影响","authors":"L. A. Mansilla Alvarez,&nbsp;G. D. Maso Talou,&nbsp;R. A. Feijóo,&nbsp;P. J. Blanco","doi":"10.1002/cnm.70065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>We conducted an in silico study of blood flow in the brain using two different computational models: fluid–structure interaction (FSI) and conventional rigid wall (CFD). These models were applied to a patient-specific vascular network derived from MRI data. We used a mid-fidelity numerical approach called Transversally Enriched Pipe Element Method (TEPEM) to solve the governing equations. In the FSI model, we coupled the TEPEM strategy with an independent-ring model to account for arterial wall compliance. We compared the FSI and CFD models to understand how arterial wall distensibility affects pressure, flow, and the spatial distribution of flow-related properties. Additionally, we introduced three synthetic anatomical variations in the Circle of Willis to extend the comparison of the FSI and CFD models to these scenarios. Our results suggest that vessel compliance introduces discrepancies up to <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mn>2</mn>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$$ 2 $$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> mmHg in distal cerebral regions and up to <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mn>15</mn>\n <mo>%</mo>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$$ 15\\% $$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> in the Wall Shear Stress. Regarding the anatomical variations on the Circle of Willis, the incomplete configuration introduces discrepancies in derived-flow quantities as the Time-Averaged Wall Shear Stress and the Relative Retention Time up to <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mn>20</mn>\n <mo>%</mo>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$$ 20\\% $$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50349,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering","volume":"41 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A 3D Patient-Specific Model of Cerebral Blood Flow: Influence of Arterial Compliance and Circle of Willis Configuration\",\"authors\":\"L. A. Mansilla Alvarez,&nbsp;G. D. Maso Talou,&nbsp;R. A. Feijóo,&nbsp;P. J. Blanco\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cnm.70065\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>We conducted an in silico study of blood flow in the brain using two different computational models: fluid–structure interaction (FSI) and conventional rigid wall (CFD). These models were applied to a patient-specific vascular network derived from MRI data. We used a mid-fidelity numerical approach called Transversally Enriched Pipe Element Method (TEPEM) to solve the governing equations. In the FSI model, we coupled the TEPEM strategy with an independent-ring model to account for arterial wall compliance. We compared the FSI and CFD models to understand how arterial wall distensibility affects pressure, flow, and the spatial distribution of flow-related properties. Additionally, we introduced three synthetic anatomical variations in the Circle of Willis to extend the comparison of the FSI and CFD models to these scenarios. Our results suggest that vessel compliance introduces discrepancies up to <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mn>2</mn>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation>$$ 2 $$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> mmHg in distal cerebral regions and up to <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mn>15</mn>\\n <mo>%</mo>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation>$$ 15\\\\% $$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> in the Wall Shear Stress. Regarding the anatomical variations on the Circle of Willis, the incomplete configuration introduces discrepancies in derived-flow quantities as the Time-Averaged Wall Shear Stress and the Relative Retention Time up to <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mn>20</mn>\\n <mo>%</mo>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation>$$ 20\\\\% $$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math>.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50349,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering\",\"volume\":\"41 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cnm.70065\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cnm.70065","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们使用两种不同的计算模型进行了脑血流的计算机研究:流固相互作用(FSI)和常规刚性壁(CFD)。这些模型应用于来自MRI数据的患者特异性血管网络。我们使用了一种称为横向充实管元法(TEPEM)的中等保真度数值方法来求解控制方程。在FSI模型中,我们将TEPEM策略与独立环模型相结合,以解释动脉壁顺应性。我们比较了FSI和CFD模型,以了解动脉壁膨胀率如何影响压力、流量和流量相关特性的空间分布。此外,我们介绍了威利斯圈的三种合成解剖变异,将FSI和CFD模型的比较扩展到这些情况。我们的研究结果表明,血管顺应性在大脑远端区域引入了高达2 $$ 2 $$ mmHg和高达15 mmHg的差异 % $$ 15\% $$ in the Wall Shear Stress. Regarding the anatomical variations on the Circle of Willis, the incomplete configuration introduces discrepancies in derived-flow quantities as the Time-Averaged Wall Shear Stress and the Relative Retention Time up to 20 % $$ 20\% $$ .
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A 3D Patient-Specific Model of Cerebral Blood Flow: Influence of Arterial Compliance and Circle of Willis Configuration

A 3D Patient-Specific Model of Cerebral Blood Flow: Influence of Arterial Compliance and Circle of Willis Configuration

We conducted an in silico study of blood flow in the brain using two different computational models: fluid–structure interaction (FSI) and conventional rigid wall (CFD). These models were applied to a patient-specific vascular network derived from MRI data. We used a mid-fidelity numerical approach called Transversally Enriched Pipe Element Method (TEPEM) to solve the governing equations. In the FSI model, we coupled the TEPEM strategy with an independent-ring model to account for arterial wall compliance. We compared the FSI and CFD models to understand how arterial wall distensibility affects pressure, flow, and the spatial distribution of flow-related properties. Additionally, we introduced three synthetic anatomical variations in the Circle of Willis to extend the comparison of the FSI and CFD models to these scenarios. Our results suggest that vessel compliance introduces discrepancies up to 2 $$ 2 $$ mmHg in distal cerebral regions and up to 15 % $$ 15\% $$ in the Wall Shear Stress. Regarding the anatomical variations on the Circle of Willis, the incomplete configuration introduces discrepancies in derived-flow quantities as the Time-Averaged Wall Shear Stress and the Relative Retention Time up to 20 % $$ 20\% $$ .

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL-MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
9.50%
发文量
103
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: All differential equation based models for biomedical applications and their novel solutions (using either established numerical methods such as finite difference, finite element and finite volume methods or new numerical methods) are within the scope of this journal. Manuscripts with experimental and analytical themes are also welcome if a component of the paper deals with numerical methods. Special cases that may not involve differential equations such as image processing, meshing and artificial intelligence are within the scope. Any research that is broadly linked to the wellbeing of the human body, either directly or indirectly, is also within the scope of this journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信