红军派系的漫长阴影:旧的解释模式如何定义当今德国的恐怖主义辩论

IF 0.6 4区 社会学 Q1 HISTORY
Hanno Balz
{"title":"红军派系的漫长阴影:旧的解释模式如何定义当今德国的恐怖主义辩论","authors":"Hanno Balz","doi":"10.1111/ajph.13055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The Red Army Faction's attack on the West-German state in the 1970s and 1980s still poses one of the most controversial issues in post-war German history. Its historical narratives have repeatedly been referred to and re-interpreted in political discourse and popular culture alike. However, this established, indeed canonised, story of German terrorism still looms large over the debates on terrorism in the 21st century. Thus, this article argues that recent terrorist threats from the radical right have been misinterpreted, and there are still common assumptions within German terrorism discourse that keep on evoking the ghosts of the past.</p>","PeriodicalId":45431,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Politics and History","volume":"71 2","pages":"225-242"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Long Shadow of the Red Army Faction: How Old Explanatory Models Define Today's Terrorism Debate in Germany\",\"authors\":\"Hanno Balz\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ajph.13055\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The Red Army Faction's attack on the West-German state in the 1970s and 1980s still poses one of the most controversial issues in post-war German history. Its historical narratives have repeatedly been referred to and re-interpreted in political discourse and popular culture alike. However, this established, indeed canonised, story of German terrorism still looms large over the debates on terrorism in the 21st century. Thus, this article argues that recent terrorist threats from the radical right have been misinterpreted, and there are still common assumptions within German terrorism discourse that keep on evoking the ghosts of the past.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45431,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Journal of Politics and History\",\"volume\":\"71 2\",\"pages\":\"225-242\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Journal of Politics and History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajph.13055\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Politics and History","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajph.13055","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

红军派在20世纪70年代和80年代对西德国家的攻击仍然是战后德国历史上最具争议的问题之一。它的历史叙事在政治话语和大众文化中被反复引用和重新诠释。然而,在21世纪关于恐怖主义的辩论中,这个既定的、实际上是被奉为经典的德国恐怖主义故事,仍然是挥之不去的阴影。因此,本文认为,最近来自激进右翼的恐怖主义威胁被误解了,在德国恐怖主义话语中仍然存在一些共同的假设,这些假设不断唤起过去的幽灵。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Long Shadow of the Red Army Faction: How Old Explanatory Models Define Today's Terrorism Debate in Germany

The Red Army Faction's attack on the West-German state in the 1970s and 1980s still poses one of the most controversial issues in post-war German history. Its historical narratives have repeatedly been referred to and re-interpreted in political discourse and popular culture alike. However, this established, indeed canonised, story of German terrorism still looms large over the debates on terrorism in the 21st century. Thus, this article argues that recent terrorist threats from the radical right have been misinterpreted, and there are still common assumptions within German terrorism discourse that keep on evoking the ghosts of the past.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: The Australian Journal of Politics and History presents papers addressing significant problems of general interest to those working in the fields of history, political studies and international affairs. Articles explore the politics and history of Australia and modern Europe, intellectual history, political history, and the history of political thought. The journal also publishes articles in the fields of international politics, Australian foreign policy, and Australia relations with the countries of the Asia-Pacific region.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信