风暴是热带森林变化的重要驱动力

IF 7.9 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Ecology Letters Pub Date : 2025-07-09 DOI:10.1111/ele.70157
Evan M. Gora, Ian R. McGregor, Helene C. Muller-Landau, Jeffrey C. Burchfield, K. C. Cushman, Vanessa E. Rubio, Gisele Biem Mori, Martin J. P. Sullivan, Matthew W. Chmielewski, Adriane Esquivel-Muelbert
{"title":"风暴是热带森林变化的重要驱动力","authors":"Evan M. Gora,&nbsp;Ian R. McGregor,&nbsp;Helene C. Muller-Landau,&nbsp;Jeffrey C. Burchfield,&nbsp;K. C. Cushman,&nbsp;Vanessa E. Rubio,&nbsp;Gisele Biem Mori,&nbsp;Martin J. P. Sullivan,&nbsp;Matthew W. Chmielewski,&nbsp;Adriane Esquivel-Muelbert","doi":"10.1111/ele.70157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Tropical forest dynamics and composition have changed over recent decades, but the proximate drivers of these changes remain unclear. Investigations into these trends have focused on increasing drought stress, CO<sub>2</sub>, temperature, and fires, whereas convective storms are generally overlooked. We argue that existing literature provides clear support for the importance of storms as drivers of forest change. We reanalyze the largest plot-based study of tropical forest carbon dynamics to show that lightning frequency—an indicator of storm activity—strongly predicts forest carbon storage and residence time, and its inclusion improves model fit and weakens evidence for the effects of high temperatures. Convective storm activity has increased 5%–25% per decade over the past half century. Extrapolating from historic trends, we estimate that storms likely contribute ca. 50% of the reported increases in biomass mortality across Amazonia, with all realistic combinations of assumptions indicating a possible range of 12%–118%. Spatial variation in storm activity shows weak relationships with drought, demonstrating that forests can experience high drought stress, high storm activity, or both. Accordingly, we hypothesise that convective storms are among the most important drivers of tropical forest change, and as such, they require significant research investment to avoid misguiding science, policy, and management.</p>","PeriodicalId":161,"journal":{"name":"Ecology Letters","volume":"28 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ele.70157","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Storms Are an Important Driver of Change in Tropical Forests\",\"authors\":\"Evan M. Gora,&nbsp;Ian R. McGregor,&nbsp;Helene C. Muller-Landau,&nbsp;Jeffrey C. Burchfield,&nbsp;K. C. Cushman,&nbsp;Vanessa E. Rubio,&nbsp;Gisele Biem Mori,&nbsp;Martin J. P. Sullivan,&nbsp;Matthew W. Chmielewski,&nbsp;Adriane Esquivel-Muelbert\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ele.70157\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Tropical forest dynamics and composition have changed over recent decades, but the proximate drivers of these changes remain unclear. Investigations into these trends have focused on increasing drought stress, CO<sub>2</sub>, temperature, and fires, whereas convective storms are generally overlooked. We argue that existing literature provides clear support for the importance of storms as drivers of forest change. We reanalyze the largest plot-based study of tropical forest carbon dynamics to show that lightning frequency—an indicator of storm activity—strongly predicts forest carbon storage and residence time, and its inclusion improves model fit and weakens evidence for the effects of high temperatures. Convective storm activity has increased 5%–25% per decade over the past half century. Extrapolating from historic trends, we estimate that storms likely contribute ca. 50% of the reported increases in biomass mortality across Amazonia, with all realistic combinations of assumptions indicating a possible range of 12%–118%. Spatial variation in storm activity shows weak relationships with drought, demonstrating that forests can experience high drought stress, high storm activity, or both. Accordingly, we hypothesise that convective storms are among the most important drivers of tropical forest change, and as such, they require significant research investment to avoid misguiding science, policy, and management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":161,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecology Letters\",\"volume\":\"28 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ele.70157\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecology Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ele.70157\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecology Letters","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ele.70157","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近几十年来,热带森林的动态和组成发生了变化,但这些变化的直接驱动因素尚不清楚。对这些趋势的调查主要集中在干旱压力、二氧化碳、温度和火灾的增加上,而对流风暴通常被忽视。我们认为,现有文献为风暴作为森林变化驱动因素的重要性提供了明确的支持。我们重新分析了基于图的热带森林碳动态的最大研究,结果表明闪电频率(风暴活动的一个指标)强烈地预测了森林碳储量和停留时间,并且它的加入改善了模型拟合,削弱了高温影响的证据。在过去的半个世纪里,对流风暴活动每十年增加5%-25%。根据历史趋势推断,我们估计风暴可能贡献了亚马逊地区报告的生物量死亡率增加的50%左右,所有现实的假设组合表明可能的范围为12%-118%。风暴活动的空间变化与干旱的关系较弱,这表明森林可能经历高干旱压力、高风暴活动,或两者兼而有之。因此,我们假设对流风暴是热带森林变化的最重要驱动因素之一,因此,它们需要大量的研究投资,以避免误导科学、政策和管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Storms Are an Important Driver of Change in Tropical Forests

Storms Are an Important Driver of Change in Tropical Forests

Tropical forest dynamics and composition have changed over recent decades, but the proximate drivers of these changes remain unclear. Investigations into these trends have focused on increasing drought stress, CO2, temperature, and fires, whereas convective storms are generally overlooked. We argue that existing literature provides clear support for the importance of storms as drivers of forest change. We reanalyze the largest plot-based study of tropical forest carbon dynamics to show that lightning frequency—an indicator of storm activity—strongly predicts forest carbon storage and residence time, and its inclusion improves model fit and weakens evidence for the effects of high temperatures. Convective storm activity has increased 5%–25% per decade over the past half century. Extrapolating from historic trends, we estimate that storms likely contribute ca. 50% of the reported increases in biomass mortality across Amazonia, with all realistic combinations of assumptions indicating a possible range of 12%–118%. Spatial variation in storm activity shows weak relationships with drought, demonstrating that forests can experience high drought stress, high storm activity, or both. Accordingly, we hypothesise that convective storms are among the most important drivers of tropical forest change, and as such, they require significant research investment to avoid misguiding science, policy, and management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecology Letters
Ecology Letters 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
17.60
自引率
3.40%
发文量
201
审稿时长
1.8 months
期刊介绍: Ecology Letters serves as a platform for the rapid publication of innovative research in ecology. It considers manuscripts across all taxa, biomes, and geographic regions, prioritizing papers that investigate clearly stated hypotheses. The journal publishes concise papers of high originality and general interest, contributing to new developments in ecology. Purely descriptive papers and those that only confirm or extend previous results are discouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信