Usman Ahmad, Waqar Younas, Majid Khan, M. M. Abbasi
{"title":"电离层扰动的纵向变化:来自2024年5月超级风暴的见解","authors":"Usman Ahmad, Waqar Younas, Majid Khan, M. M. Abbasi","doi":"10.1029/2025JA033981","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We present an analysis of the super storm event that occurred on 10–11 May, 2024, focusing on ionospheric and magnetic signatures across different longitudinal sectors using space-borne and ground-based data. On 10 May, a strong positive ionospheric storm was observed in the southern hemisphere (winter), while northern hemisphere (summer) experienced negative storm effects. The most pronounced positive storm effects emerged in the American-Pacific sector during local evening hours, followed by Asia and Africa on 11 May. A significant drop in the <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>O</mi>\n <mo>/</mo>\n <msub>\n <mi>N</mi>\n <mn>2</mn>\n </msub>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> $O/{N}_{2}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> ratio was observed in the northern hemisphere, which likely contributed to the negative ionospheric storm. This depletion appears to be driven by strong thermospheric winds induced by the increase auroral electrojet currents, as indicated by the SME index. The SWARM satellite data revealed numerous plasma bubbles, predominantly at equatorial ionization anomaly (EIA) crests, with some extending up to <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mn>40</mn>\n <mo>°</mo>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> $40{}^{\\circ}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> latitude. Our analysis suggests that equatorial plasma bubbles (EPBs) following the initial phase of the storm were enhanced by prompt penetration electric fields (PPEFs) and strong electrojet currents, while those in recovery phase were primarily driven by disturbance dynamo electric fields (DDEFs). Additionally, in the America and Africa regions, the magnitude of <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>D</mi>\n <mi>dyn</mi>\n </msub>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> ${D}_{\\mathit{dyn}}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> was higher than in the Asia and Pacific sectors, indicating strong neutral winds that contribute to the decrease in <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>O</mi>\n <mo>/</mo>\n <msub>\n <mi>N</mi>\n <mn>2</mn>\n </msub>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> $O/{N}_{2}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> ratio. Conversely, <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>D</mi>\n <msub>\n <mi>P</mi>\n <mn>2</mn>\n </msub>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> $D{P}_{2}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> exhibited an inverse relation with <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>D</mi>\n <mi>dyn</mi>\n </msub>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> ${D}_{\\mathit{dyn}}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>, reflecting enhanced solar wind-magnetosphere coupling. This highlights the asymmetric response of different longitudinal regions during this super storm.</p>","PeriodicalId":15894,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics","volume":"130 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Longitudinal Variations in the Ionospheric Disturbances: Insights From the May 2024 Super Storm\",\"authors\":\"Usman Ahmad, Waqar Younas, Majid Khan, M. M. Abbasi\",\"doi\":\"10.1029/2025JA033981\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>We present an analysis of the super storm event that occurred on 10–11 May, 2024, focusing on ionospheric and magnetic signatures across different longitudinal sectors using space-borne and ground-based data. On 10 May, a strong positive ionospheric storm was observed in the southern hemisphere (winter), while northern hemisphere (summer) experienced negative storm effects. The most pronounced positive storm effects emerged in the American-Pacific sector during local evening hours, followed by Asia and Africa on 11 May. A significant drop in the <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mi>O</mi>\\n <mo>/</mo>\\n <msub>\\n <mi>N</mi>\\n <mn>2</mn>\\n </msub>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation> $O/{N}_{2}$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> ratio was observed in the northern hemisphere, which likely contributed to the negative ionospheric storm. This depletion appears to be driven by strong thermospheric winds induced by the increase auroral electrojet currents, as indicated by the SME index. The SWARM satellite data revealed numerous plasma bubbles, predominantly at equatorial ionization anomaly (EIA) crests, with some extending up to <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mn>40</mn>\\n <mo>°</mo>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation> $40{}^{\\\\circ}$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> latitude. Our analysis suggests that equatorial plasma bubbles (EPBs) following the initial phase of the storm were enhanced by prompt penetration electric fields (PPEFs) and strong electrojet currents, while those in recovery phase were primarily driven by disturbance dynamo electric fields (DDEFs). Additionally, in the America and Africa regions, the magnitude of <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <msub>\\n <mi>D</mi>\\n <mi>dyn</mi>\\n </msub>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation> ${D}_{\\\\mathit{dyn}}$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> was higher than in the Asia and Pacific sectors, indicating strong neutral winds that contribute to the decrease in <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mi>O</mi>\\n <mo>/</mo>\\n <msub>\\n <mi>N</mi>\\n <mn>2</mn>\\n </msub>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation> $O/{N}_{2}$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> ratio. Conversely, <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mi>D</mi>\\n <msub>\\n <mi>P</mi>\\n <mn>2</mn>\\n </msub>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation> $D{P}_{2}$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> exhibited an inverse relation with <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <msub>\\n <mi>D</mi>\\n <mi>dyn</mi>\\n </msub>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation> ${D}_{\\\\mathit{dyn}}$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math>, reflecting enhanced solar wind-magnetosphere coupling. This highlights the asymmetric response of different longitudinal regions during this super storm.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15894,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics\",\"volume\":\"130 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2025JA033981\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2025JA033981","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本文对发生在2024年5月10日至11日的超级风暴事件进行了分析,重点分析了电离层和不同纵向扇区的磁特征,使用了星载和地面数据。5月10日,南半球(冬季)观测到强烈的正电离层风暴,而北半球(夏季)则经历了负风暴影响。最明显的正面风暴影响出现在美国-太平洋地区,其后是5月11日的亚洲和非洲。在北半球观测到O/ N 2 $O/{N}_{2}$比值显著下降,这可能是负电离层风暴的原因之一。正如SME指数所显示的那样,这种损耗似乎是由极光电喷流增加引起的强热层风所驱动的。SWARM卫星数据显示了大量的等离子体气泡,主要位于赤道电离异常(EIA)波峰,其中一些延伸到40°$40{}^{\circ}$纬度。分析表明,风暴初始阶段后赤道等离子体气泡(EPBs)主要受到快速穿透电场(ppfs)和强电射流的增强,而恢复阶段的等离子体气泡主要受到扰动发电机电场(DDEFs)的驱动。此外,在美洲和非洲区域,ddyn ${\mathit{dyn}}$的幅度高于亚洲和太平洋区域。表明强中性风导致O/ N 2 $O/{N}_{2}$比值减小。相反,pd2 $D{P}_{2}$与D dyn ${D}_{\mathit{dyn}}$呈反比关系,反映了太阳风-磁层耦合增强。这凸显了这次超级风暴期间不同纵向区域的不对称响应。
Longitudinal Variations in the Ionospheric Disturbances: Insights From the May 2024 Super Storm
We present an analysis of the super storm event that occurred on 10–11 May, 2024, focusing on ionospheric and magnetic signatures across different longitudinal sectors using space-borne and ground-based data. On 10 May, a strong positive ionospheric storm was observed in the southern hemisphere (winter), while northern hemisphere (summer) experienced negative storm effects. The most pronounced positive storm effects emerged in the American-Pacific sector during local evening hours, followed by Asia and Africa on 11 May. A significant drop in the ratio was observed in the northern hemisphere, which likely contributed to the negative ionospheric storm. This depletion appears to be driven by strong thermospheric winds induced by the increase auroral electrojet currents, as indicated by the SME index. The SWARM satellite data revealed numerous plasma bubbles, predominantly at equatorial ionization anomaly (EIA) crests, with some extending up to latitude. Our analysis suggests that equatorial plasma bubbles (EPBs) following the initial phase of the storm were enhanced by prompt penetration electric fields (PPEFs) and strong electrojet currents, while those in recovery phase were primarily driven by disturbance dynamo electric fields (DDEFs). Additionally, in the America and Africa regions, the magnitude of was higher than in the Asia and Pacific sectors, indicating strong neutral winds that contribute to the decrease in ratio. Conversely, exhibited an inverse relation with , reflecting enhanced solar wind-magnetosphere coupling. This highlights the asymmetric response of different longitudinal regions during this super storm.