Joel Lansing Reed , Astrid M. Villamil , Scott E. Branton II
{"title":"神经规范网络:对公共关系中边缘化的系统理解","authors":"Joel Lansing Reed , Astrid M. Villamil , Scott E. Branton II","doi":"10.1016/j.pubrev.2025.102610","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study explores how systems of marginalization permeate relationship networks and how the practice of public relations intermediates those systems. Through the analysis of 22 semi-structured interviews with leaders of neurodiversity workforce intermediaries (NWIs), we explore how advocates for neurodivergent employment encounter, uphold, and/or respond to systems of marginalization. The findings suggest that marginalization produced relational tensions within NWIs’ relationship networks that constrained their advocacy efforts. We argue that a critical network approach to public relations reveals how marginalization operates systemically, materializing in both tacit and explicit ways within different facets of relationship networks. We further suggest that the practice of public relations involves intermediation with these systems of marginalization. We conclude by stressing the importance of moving beyond episodic or incidental understandings of marginalization within public relations research to explore the socio-cultural systems that inform and constrain relationships. l</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48263,"journal":{"name":"Public Relations Review","volume":"51 4","pages":"Article 102610"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Networks of neuronormativity: Toward a systemic understanding of marginalization in public relations\",\"authors\":\"Joel Lansing Reed , Astrid M. Villamil , Scott E. Branton II\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pubrev.2025.102610\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study explores how systems of marginalization permeate relationship networks and how the practice of public relations intermediates those systems. Through the analysis of 22 semi-structured interviews with leaders of neurodiversity workforce intermediaries (NWIs), we explore how advocates for neurodivergent employment encounter, uphold, and/or respond to systems of marginalization. The findings suggest that marginalization produced relational tensions within NWIs’ relationship networks that constrained their advocacy efforts. We argue that a critical network approach to public relations reveals how marginalization operates systemically, materializing in both tacit and explicit ways within different facets of relationship networks. We further suggest that the practice of public relations involves intermediation with these systems of marginalization. We conclude by stressing the importance of moving beyond episodic or incidental understandings of marginalization within public relations research to explore the socio-cultural systems that inform and constrain relationships. l</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48263,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Public Relations Review\",\"volume\":\"51 4\",\"pages\":\"Article 102610\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Public Relations Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0363811125000724\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Relations Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0363811125000724","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Networks of neuronormativity: Toward a systemic understanding of marginalization in public relations
This study explores how systems of marginalization permeate relationship networks and how the practice of public relations intermediates those systems. Through the analysis of 22 semi-structured interviews with leaders of neurodiversity workforce intermediaries (NWIs), we explore how advocates for neurodivergent employment encounter, uphold, and/or respond to systems of marginalization. The findings suggest that marginalization produced relational tensions within NWIs’ relationship networks that constrained their advocacy efforts. We argue that a critical network approach to public relations reveals how marginalization operates systemically, materializing in both tacit and explicit ways within different facets of relationship networks. We further suggest that the practice of public relations involves intermediation with these systems of marginalization. We conclude by stressing the importance of moving beyond episodic or incidental understandings of marginalization within public relations research to explore the socio-cultural systems that inform and constrain relationships. l
期刊介绍:
The Public Relations Review is the oldest journal devoted to articles that examine public relations in depth, and commentaries by specialists in the field. Most of the articles are based on empirical research undertaken by professionals and academics in the field. In addition to research articles and commentaries, The Review publishes invited research in brief, and book reviews in the fields of public relations, mass communications, organizational communications, public opinion formations, social science research and evaluation, marketing, management and public policy formation.