心理健康和儿童税收抵免:支付方式的比较评估

IF 2.1 4区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS
Teshager Assefa Sisha , Shuoli Zhao , Yuqing Zheng
{"title":"心理健康和儿童税收抵免:支付方式的比较评估","authors":"Teshager Assefa Sisha ,&nbsp;Shuoli Zhao ,&nbsp;Yuqing Zheng","doi":"10.1016/j.econlet.2025.112494","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The expanded Child Tax Credit (CTC) has the potential to improve the mental well-being of families with dependent children. This study investigates the impact of CTC disbursement methods – monthly installments versus a single, equivalent lump-sum payment – on the mental health of low-income households, a particularly vulnerable population. Using data from the Household Pulse Survey and a triple difference analysis, we compare the correlation between these two disbursement strategies and four key mental health indicators: anxiety, worry, disinterest, and down feeling. Results demonstrate that lump-sum disbursements are associated with significantly greater improvements in mental health outcomes. While monthly payments may offer distinct, potentially longer-term benefits, our findings highlight the superior short-term mental health outcomes associated with lump-sum disbursements. These results point to the importance of disbursement strategy in the design and implementation of financial support programs aimed at improving family well-being.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11468,"journal":{"name":"Economics Letters","volume":"254 ","pages":"Article 112494"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychological well-being and child tax credit: Comparative assessment of payment approaches\",\"authors\":\"Teshager Assefa Sisha ,&nbsp;Shuoli Zhao ,&nbsp;Yuqing Zheng\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.econlet.2025.112494\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The expanded Child Tax Credit (CTC) has the potential to improve the mental well-being of families with dependent children. This study investigates the impact of CTC disbursement methods – monthly installments versus a single, equivalent lump-sum payment – on the mental health of low-income households, a particularly vulnerable population. Using data from the Household Pulse Survey and a triple difference analysis, we compare the correlation between these two disbursement strategies and four key mental health indicators: anxiety, worry, disinterest, and down feeling. Results demonstrate that lump-sum disbursements are associated with significantly greater improvements in mental health outcomes. While monthly payments may offer distinct, potentially longer-term benefits, our findings highlight the superior short-term mental health outcomes associated with lump-sum disbursements. These results point to the importance of disbursement strategy in the design and implementation of financial support programs aimed at improving family well-being.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11468,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economics Letters\",\"volume\":\"254 \",\"pages\":\"Article 112494\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economics Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165176525003313\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economics Letters","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165176525003313","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

扩大的儿童税收抵免(CTC)有可能改善有受抚养儿童的家庭的心理健康。本研究调查了CTC支付方式(按月分期付款与一次性等额支付)对低收入家庭(尤其是弱势群体)心理健康的影响。利用家庭脉搏调查的数据和三重差异分析,我们比较了这两种支付策略与四个关键心理健康指标之间的相关性:焦虑、担心、不感兴趣和情绪低落。结果表明,一次性支付与心理健康结果的显著改善有关。虽然每月付款可能会带来明显的、潜在的长期好处,但我们的研究结果强调了一次性付款对短期心理健康的好处。这些结果指出了支付策略在设计和实施旨在改善家庭福祉的财政支持计划中的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Psychological well-being and child tax credit: Comparative assessment of payment approaches
The expanded Child Tax Credit (CTC) has the potential to improve the mental well-being of families with dependent children. This study investigates the impact of CTC disbursement methods – monthly installments versus a single, equivalent lump-sum payment – on the mental health of low-income households, a particularly vulnerable population. Using data from the Household Pulse Survey and a triple difference analysis, we compare the correlation between these two disbursement strategies and four key mental health indicators: anxiety, worry, disinterest, and down feeling. Results demonstrate that lump-sum disbursements are associated with significantly greater improvements in mental health outcomes. While monthly payments may offer distinct, potentially longer-term benefits, our findings highlight the superior short-term mental health outcomes associated with lump-sum disbursements. These results point to the importance of disbursement strategy in the design and implementation of financial support programs aimed at improving family well-being.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Economics Letters
Economics Letters ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
348
审稿时长
30 days
期刊介绍: Many economists today are concerned by the proliferation of journals and the concomitant labyrinth of research to be conquered in order to reach the specific information they require. To combat this tendency, Economics Letters has been conceived and designed outside the realm of the traditional economics journal. As a Letters Journal, it consists of concise communications (letters) that provide a means of rapid and efficient dissemination of new results, models and methods in all fields of economic research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信