中国血液感染中四种药物对耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌最低抑制浓度的趋势:一项为期6年的多中心研究(2017 - 2022

Bing Lu , Wenjiao Chang , Huaiwei Lu , Zhengchao Nie , Yongqin Wu , Xiaoling Ma , Yunbo Chen , Xiaofang Wang , Yangyan Wang , Yonghong Xiao , Yuanyuan Dai
{"title":"中国血液感染中四种药物对耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌最低抑制浓度的趋势:一项为期6年的多中心研究(2017 - 2022","authors":"Bing Lu ,&nbsp;Wenjiao Chang ,&nbsp;Huaiwei Lu ,&nbsp;Zhengchao Nie ,&nbsp;Yongqin Wu ,&nbsp;Xiaoling Ma ,&nbsp;Yunbo Chen ,&nbsp;Xiaofang Wang ,&nbsp;Yangyan Wang ,&nbsp;Yonghong Xiao ,&nbsp;Yuanyuan Dai","doi":"10.1016/j.dcit.2025.100052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div><em>Staphylococcus aureus</em> bacteremia is a critical and pernicious infection, and in particular methicillin-resistant <em>Staphylococcus aureus</em> (MRSA) is increasing in treatment failure. This study analyzed trends in the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of limited antimicrobials against MRSA bloodstream isolates in China; specifically, the antibiotics vancomycin, daptomycin, linezolid, and teicoplanin.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A total of 3901 <em>S. aureus</em> blood isolates, including 1065 MRSA isolates, were collected from ten Chinese provinces between 2017 and 2022. Broth microdilution was used to establish the MICs for the four antimicrobials. The geometric mean MICs (GM MICs), MIC50s (inhibition of 50 % of <em>S. aureus</em>), MIC90s (inhibition of 90 % of <em>S. aureus</em>), and MICs distribution were determined for each year.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The geometric mean inhibitory concentration of vancomycin for MRSA isolates increased from 0.58 mg/L in 2018 to 1.01 mg/L by 2022; and that of linezolid decreased from 1.52 mg/L in 2017 to 0.94 mg/L in 2022. Daptomycin and teicoplanin demonstrated no clear trends. MRSA isolates with vancomycin MICs ≤0.5 mg/mL significantly decreased from 77.1 % in 2018 to 8.8 % in 2022. For linezolid, those with MICs &gt;1 and ≤ 2 mg/L also decreased from 62.8 % in 2017 to 26.1 % in 2022. The highest geometric mean MICs of daptomycin, linezolid, vancomycin, and teicoplanin were respectively seen in Yunnan (0.465 mg/L), Henan (1.368 mg/L), Gansu (0.908 mg/L), and Hubei (0.579 mg/L); whereas the lowest values were observed in Jiangxi (0.355 mg/L), Yunnan (0.896 mg/L), Yunnan (0.600 mg/L), and Henan (0.438 mg/L). MRSA isolates originating from tertiary care hospitals exhibited lower sensitivity for teicoplanin than those from non-tertiary care hospitals.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>MRSA isolates from bloodstream infections in China are presently showing lower sensitivity to vancomycin and higher sensitivity to linezolid.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100358,"journal":{"name":"Decoding Infection and Transmission","volume":"3 ","pages":"Article 100052"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trends in the minimum inhibitory concentrations for four agents against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in bloodstream infections in China: a 6-year multi-center study from 2017 to 2022\",\"authors\":\"Bing Lu ,&nbsp;Wenjiao Chang ,&nbsp;Huaiwei Lu ,&nbsp;Zhengchao Nie ,&nbsp;Yongqin Wu ,&nbsp;Xiaoling Ma ,&nbsp;Yunbo Chen ,&nbsp;Xiaofang Wang ,&nbsp;Yangyan Wang ,&nbsp;Yonghong Xiao ,&nbsp;Yuanyuan Dai\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.dcit.2025.100052\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div><em>Staphylococcus aureus</em> bacteremia is a critical and pernicious infection, and in particular methicillin-resistant <em>Staphylococcus aureus</em> (MRSA) is increasing in treatment failure. This study analyzed trends in the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of limited antimicrobials against MRSA bloodstream isolates in China; specifically, the antibiotics vancomycin, daptomycin, linezolid, and teicoplanin.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A total of 3901 <em>S. aureus</em> blood isolates, including 1065 MRSA isolates, were collected from ten Chinese provinces between 2017 and 2022. Broth microdilution was used to establish the MICs for the four antimicrobials. The geometric mean MICs (GM MICs), MIC50s (inhibition of 50 % of <em>S. aureus</em>), MIC90s (inhibition of 90 % of <em>S. aureus</em>), and MICs distribution were determined for each year.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The geometric mean inhibitory concentration of vancomycin for MRSA isolates increased from 0.58 mg/L in 2018 to 1.01 mg/L by 2022; and that of linezolid decreased from 1.52 mg/L in 2017 to 0.94 mg/L in 2022. Daptomycin and teicoplanin demonstrated no clear trends. MRSA isolates with vancomycin MICs ≤0.5 mg/mL significantly decreased from 77.1 % in 2018 to 8.8 % in 2022. For linezolid, those with MICs &gt;1 and ≤ 2 mg/L also decreased from 62.8 % in 2017 to 26.1 % in 2022. The highest geometric mean MICs of daptomycin, linezolid, vancomycin, and teicoplanin were respectively seen in Yunnan (0.465 mg/L), Henan (1.368 mg/L), Gansu (0.908 mg/L), and Hubei (0.579 mg/L); whereas the lowest values were observed in Jiangxi (0.355 mg/L), Yunnan (0.896 mg/L), Yunnan (0.600 mg/L), and Henan (0.438 mg/L). MRSA isolates originating from tertiary care hospitals exhibited lower sensitivity for teicoplanin than those from non-tertiary care hospitals.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>MRSA isolates from bloodstream infections in China are presently showing lower sensitivity to vancomycin and higher sensitivity to linezolid.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100358,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Decoding Infection and Transmission\",\"volume\":\"3 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100052\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Decoding Infection and Transmission\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949924025000138\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Decoding Infection and Transmission","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949924025000138","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症是一种严重的恶性感染,尤其是耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)的治疗失败率越来越高。本研究分析了中国有限抗菌药物对MRSA血液分离株的最低抑菌浓度(mic)趋势;特别是抗生素万古霉素、达托霉素、利奈唑胺和替柯普兰。方法2017 - 2022年在中国10个省份采集3901株金黄色葡萄球菌血分离株,其中MRSA 1065株。采用微量肉汤稀释法建立4种抗菌素的mic。测定每年的几何平均mic (GM mic)、mic 50(抑制50%金黄色葡萄球菌)、mic 90(抑制90%金黄色葡萄球菌)和mic分布。结果万古霉素对MRSA分离株的几何平均抑制浓度由2018年的0.58 mg/L上升至2022年的1.01 mg/L;利奈唑胺含量由2017年的1.52 mg/L降至2022年的0.94 mg/L。达托霉素和替柯普兰无明显趋势。万古霉素mic≤0.5 mg/mL的MRSA分离株从2018年的77.1%显著下降至2022年的8.8%。对于利奈唑胺,mic为1和≤2 mg/L的患者也从2017年的62.8%下降到2022年的26.1%。达托霉素、利奈唑胺、万古霉素和替柯planin几何平均mic最高的地区分别为云南(0.465 mg/L)、河南(1.368 mg/L)、甘肃(0.908 mg/L)和湖北(0.579 mg/L);江西(0.355 mg/L)、云南(0.896 mg/L)、云南(0.600 mg/L)、河南(0.438 mg/L)最低。来自三级医院的MRSA分离株对替柯planin的敏感性低于来自非三级医院的MRSA分离株。结论中国血液感染的smrsa分离株对万古霉素敏感性较低,对利奈唑胺敏感性较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Trends in the minimum inhibitory concentrations for four agents against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in bloodstream infections in China: a 6-year multi-center study from 2017 to 2022

Trends in the minimum inhibitory concentrations for four agents against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in bloodstream infections in China: a 6-year multi-center study from 2017 to 2022

Objective

Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia is a critical and pernicious infection, and in particular methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is increasing in treatment failure. This study analyzed trends in the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of limited antimicrobials against MRSA bloodstream isolates in China; specifically, the antibiotics vancomycin, daptomycin, linezolid, and teicoplanin.

Methods

A total of 3901 S. aureus blood isolates, including 1065 MRSA isolates, were collected from ten Chinese provinces between 2017 and 2022. Broth microdilution was used to establish the MICs for the four antimicrobials. The geometric mean MICs (GM MICs), MIC50s (inhibition of 50 % of S. aureus), MIC90s (inhibition of 90 % of S. aureus), and MICs distribution were determined for each year.

Results

The geometric mean inhibitory concentration of vancomycin for MRSA isolates increased from 0.58 mg/L in 2018 to 1.01 mg/L by 2022; and that of linezolid decreased from 1.52 mg/L in 2017 to 0.94 mg/L in 2022. Daptomycin and teicoplanin demonstrated no clear trends. MRSA isolates with vancomycin MICs ≤0.5 mg/mL significantly decreased from 77.1 % in 2018 to 8.8 % in 2022. For linezolid, those with MICs >1 and ≤ 2 mg/L also decreased from 62.8 % in 2017 to 26.1 % in 2022. The highest geometric mean MICs of daptomycin, linezolid, vancomycin, and teicoplanin were respectively seen in Yunnan (0.465 mg/L), Henan (1.368 mg/L), Gansu (0.908 mg/L), and Hubei (0.579 mg/L); whereas the lowest values were observed in Jiangxi (0.355 mg/L), Yunnan (0.896 mg/L), Yunnan (0.600 mg/L), and Henan (0.438 mg/L). MRSA isolates originating from tertiary care hospitals exhibited lower sensitivity for teicoplanin than those from non-tertiary care hospitals.

Conclusions

MRSA isolates from bloodstream infections in China are presently showing lower sensitivity to vancomycin and higher sensitivity to linezolid.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信