确定今后的步骤，以便在区域渔业管理组织的科学委员会之间提供有效的渔业管理咨询意见

IF 3.7 2区社会学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES

Marine Policy Pub Date : 2025-07-09 DOI:10.1016/j.marpol.2025.106832

Maria Grazia Pennino , Santiago Cerviño , Marta Cousido-Rocha , Ruth Fernandez , Diana Gonzalez-Troncoso , Fernando Gonzalez , Beatriz Guijarro , José Luis Pérez Gil , Maria Soto

{"title":"确定今后的步骤，以便在区域渔业管理组织的科学委员会之间提供有效的渔业管理咨询意见","authors":"Maria Grazia Pennino , Santiago Cerviño , Marta Cousido-Rocha , Ruth Fernandez , Diana Gonzalez-Troncoso , Fernando Gonzalez , Beatriz Guijarro , José Luis Pérez Gil , Maria Soto","doi":"10.1016/j.marpol.2025.106832","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Fish stocks around the world are managed by regional fisheries management organizations (RFMOs) with regulatory authority which usually have differences in the internal processes to provide scientific advice. To improve the cooperation between the different RFMOs, and contribute to the reinforcement of regional fisheries assessment bodies (RFABs), we compare the work procedures from the main organizations that evaluate most of the commercial stocks of interest European fleets. The comparison is made in terms of stock assessment methods, decision-making, biological reference points, transparency, stakeholder’s involvement and implementation of ecosystem-based fisheries management (EBFM) and precautionary approach (PA). Key scientific experts from each RFMO and RFAB have been involved in this analysis, identifying crucial future steps to enhance collaboration for efficient fisheries management advice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48427,"journal":{"name":"Marine Policy","volume":"181 ","pages":"Article 106832"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identifying future steps to allow an efficient fisheries management advice among scientific committees in regional fisheries management organizations\",\"authors\":\"Maria Grazia Pennino , Santiago Cerviño , Marta Cousido-Rocha , Ruth Fernandez , Diana Gonzalez-Troncoso , Fernando Gonzalez , Beatriz Guijarro , José Luis Pérez Gil , Maria Soto\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.marpol.2025.106832\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Fish stocks around the world are managed by regional fisheries management organizations (RFMOs) with regulatory authority which usually have differences in the internal processes to provide scientific advice. To improve the cooperation between the different RFMOs, and contribute to the reinforcement of regional fisheries assessment bodies (RFABs), we compare the work procedures from the main organizations that evaluate most of the commercial stocks of interest European fleets. The comparison is made in terms of stock assessment methods, decision-making, biological reference points, transparency, stakeholder’s involvement and implementation of ecosystem-based fisheries management (EBFM) and precautionary approach (PA). Key scientific experts from each RFMO and RFAB have been involved in this analysis, identifying crucial future steps to enhance collaboration for efficient fisheries management advice.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48427,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Marine Policy\",\"volume\":\"181 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106832\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Marine Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308597X25002477\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Marine Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308597X25002477","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

世界各地的鱼类资源由具有管理权力的区域渔业管理组织管理，这些组织在提供科学咨询意见的内部程序方面通常存在差异。为了改善不同区域渔业管理组织之间的合作，并有助于加强区域渔业评估机构（RFABs），我们比较了评估大多数感兴趣的欧洲船队商业种群的主要组织的工作程序。在种群评估方法、决策、生物参考点、透明度、利益相关者参与以及基于生态系统的渔业管理（EBFM）和预防方法（PA）的实施方面进行了比较。来自各区域渔业管理组织和区域渔业委员会的主要科学专家参与了这项分析，确定了今后加强合作以提供有效渔业管理咨询的关键步骤。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Identifying future steps to allow an efficient fisheries management advice among scientific committees in regional fisheries management organizations

Fish stocks around the world are managed by regional fisheries management organizations (RFMOs) with regulatory authority which usually have differences in the internal processes to provide scientific advice. To improve the cooperation between the different RFMOs, and contribute to the reinforcement of regional fisheries assessment bodies (RFABs), we compare the work procedures from the main organizations that evaluate most of the commercial stocks of interest European fleets. The comparison is made in terms of stock assessment methods, decision-making, biological reference points, transparency, stakeholder’s involvement and implementation of ecosystem-based fisheries management (EBFM) and precautionary approach (PA). Key scientific experts from each RFMO and RFAB have been involved in this analysis, identifying crucial future steps to enhance collaboration for efficient fisheries management advice.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Marine Policy Multiple-

CiteScore

7.60

自引率

13.20%

发文量

428

期刊介绍： Marine Policy is the leading journal of ocean policy studies. It offers researchers, analysts and policy makers a unique combination of analyses in the principal social science disciplines relevant to the formulation of marine policy. Major articles are contributed by specialists in marine affairs, including marine economists and marine resource managers, political scientists, marine scientists, international lawyers, geographers and anthropologists. Drawing on their expertise and research, the journal covers: international, regional and national marine policies; institutional arrangements for the management and regulation of marine activities, including fisheries and shipping; conflict resolution; marine pollution and environment; conservation and use of marine resources. Regular features of Marine Policy include research reports, conference reports and reports on current developments to keep readers up-to-date with the latest developments and research in ocean affairs.