Arup Kumar Ghosh , Subhankar Bhattacharjee , Gautam Garai
{"title":"通信系统中带通滤波器和波分复用器的性能优化","authors":"Arup Kumar Ghosh , Subhankar Bhattacharjee , Gautam Garai","doi":"10.1016/j.swevo.2025.102049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The growing demand for compact, high-speed, and spectrally precise components in next-generation communication systems poses significant challenges in the design and optimization of photonic Band Pass Filters (BPFs) and Wavelength Division Multiplexers (WDMs). Conventional algorithms, such as Genetic and Taguchi Optimization (GTO), Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), Grasshopper Optimization (GRO), and Bald Eagle Search Optimization (BESO), often suffer from premature convergence, spectral inaccuracies, limited flexibility, and poor scalability when applied to complex, high-dimensional photonic structures. To address these limitations, this study introduces the Advanced Distributed Dynamic Differential Evolution (AD<sup>3</sup>E) algorithm, an advanced distributed optimization technique. Applied to 1D Si<sub>y</sub>Ge<sub>1-y</sub>–SiO<sub>2</sub> photonic crystals, AD<sup>3</sup>E achieves outstanding results in BPFs with 99. 9814% Transmittivity and a 0.4 nm FWHM at the center wavelength of 1550 nm and WDMs with 99. 9579% Transmittivity, a 0.4 nm FWHM and 0.6 nm channel spacing to avoid crosstalk. The dynamic parameter adaptation of AD<sup>3</sup>E significantly outperforms static settings. Further validation shows less than 8% performance degradation under <span><math><mo>±</mo></math></span>5% fabrication tolerance while Wilcoxon signed-rank testing (<span><math><mrow><mi>p</mi><mo><</mo><mn>0</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>05</mn></mrow></math></span>) confirms its statistical superiority over GTO, PSO, GRO, and BESO in 32 benchmark functions (30D and 100D). AD<sup>3</sup>E stands out as a powerful tool for next-generation photonic device optimization.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48682,"journal":{"name":"Swarm and Evolutionary Computation","volume":"97 ","pages":"Article 102049"},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance optimization of Band Pass Filters and Wavelength Division Multiplexers for communication systems\",\"authors\":\"Arup Kumar Ghosh , Subhankar Bhattacharjee , Gautam Garai\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.swevo.2025.102049\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The growing demand for compact, high-speed, and spectrally precise components in next-generation communication systems poses significant challenges in the design and optimization of photonic Band Pass Filters (BPFs) and Wavelength Division Multiplexers (WDMs). Conventional algorithms, such as Genetic and Taguchi Optimization (GTO), Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), Grasshopper Optimization (GRO), and Bald Eagle Search Optimization (BESO), often suffer from premature convergence, spectral inaccuracies, limited flexibility, and poor scalability when applied to complex, high-dimensional photonic structures. To address these limitations, this study introduces the Advanced Distributed Dynamic Differential Evolution (AD<sup>3</sup>E) algorithm, an advanced distributed optimization technique. Applied to 1D Si<sub>y</sub>Ge<sub>1-y</sub>–SiO<sub>2</sub> photonic crystals, AD<sup>3</sup>E achieves outstanding results in BPFs with 99. 9814% Transmittivity and a 0.4 nm FWHM at the center wavelength of 1550 nm and WDMs with 99. 9579% Transmittivity, a 0.4 nm FWHM and 0.6 nm channel spacing to avoid crosstalk. The dynamic parameter adaptation of AD<sup>3</sup>E significantly outperforms static settings. Further validation shows less than 8% performance degradation under <span><math><mo>±</mo></math></span>5% fabrication tolerance while Wilcoxon signed-rank testing (<span><math><mrow><mi>p</mi><mo><</mo><mn>0</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>05</mn></mrow></math></span>) confirms its statistical superiority over GTO, PSO, GRO, and BESO in 32 benchmark functions (30D and 100D). AD<sup>3</sup>E stands out as a powerful tool for next-generation photonic device optimization.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48682,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Swarm and Evolutionary Computation\",\"volume\":\"97 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102049\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Swarm and Evolutionary Computation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221065022500207X\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Swarm and Evolutionary Computation","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221065022500207X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Performance optimization of Band Pass Filters and Wavelength Division Multiplexers for communication systems
The growing demand for compact, high-speed, and spectrally precise components in next-generation communication systems poses significant challenges in the design and optimization of photonic Band Pass Filters (BPFs) and Wavelength Division Multiplexers (WDMs). Conventional algorithms, such as Genetic and Taguchi Optimization (GTO), Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), Grasshopper Optimization (GRO), and Bald Eagle Search Optimization (BESO), often suffer from premature convergence, spectral inaccuracies, limited flexibility, and poor scalability when applied to complex, high-dimensional photonic structures. To address these limitations, this study introduces the Advanced Distributed Dynamic Differential Evolution (AD3E) algorithm, an advanced distributed optimization technique. Applied to 1D SiyGe1-y–SiO2 photonic crystals, AD3E achieves outstanding results in BPFs with 99. 9814% Transmittivity and a 0.4 nm FWHM at the center wavelength of 1550 nm and WDMs with 99. 9579% Transmittivity, a 0.4 nm FWHM and 0.6 nm channel spacing to avoid crosstalk. The dynamic parameter adaptation of AD3E significantly outperforms static settings. Further validation shows less than 8% performance degradation under 5% fabrication tolerance while Wilcoxon signed-rank testing () confirms its statistical superiority over GTO, PSO, GRO, and BESO in 32 benchmark functions (30D and 100D). AD3E stands out as a powerful tool for next-generation photonic device optimization.
期刊介绍:
Swarm and Evolutionary Computation is a pioneering peer-reviewed journal focused on the latest research and advancements in nature-inspired intelligent computation using swarm and evolutionary algorithms. It covers theoretical, experimental, and practical aspects of these paradigms and their hybrids, promoting interdisciplinary research. The journal prioritizes the publication of high-quality, original articles that push the boundaries of evolutionary computation and swarm intelligence. Additionally, it welcomes survey papers on current topics and novel applications. Topics of interest include but are not limited to: Genetic Algorithms, and Genetic Programming, Evolution Strategies, and Evolutionary Programming, Differential Evolution, Artificial Immune Systems, Particle Swarms, Ant Colony, Bacterial Foraging, Artificial Bees, Fireflies Algorithm, Harmony Search, Artificial Life, Digital Organisms, Estimation of Distribution Algorithms, Stochastic Diffusion Search, Quantum Computing, Nano Computing, Membrane Computing, Human-centric Computing, Hybridization of Algorithms, Memetic Computing, Autonomic Computing, Self-organizing systems, Combinatorial, Discrete, Binary, Constrained, Multi-objective, Multi-modal, Dynamic, and Large-scale Optimization.