研究土壤微塑性迁移的柔性壁渗透器:有效性、优势和限制。

IF 11.3 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Yifei Gao, Surya Sujathan, Elizabeth A. Carter, David Airey and Abbas El-Zein*, 
{"title":"研究土壤微塑性迁移的柔性壁渗透器:有效性、优势和限制。","authors":"Yifei Gao,&nbsp;Surya Sujathan,&nbsp;Elizabeth A. Carter,&nbsp;David Airey and Abbas El-Zein*,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acs.est.4c14274","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Microplastics (MPs) are emerging contaminants detected in a range of ecosystems, including soils. Rigid wall columns are widely used to study MP transport in soil. However, they are limited in their ability to control boundary conditions and prevent sidewall leakage in studying low-permeability soils. Flexible wall permeameters (FWPs), commonly used for measuring soil permeability, offer more precise control of confining pressure and leakage, making them a promising alternative that remains under-explored. This study evaluates FWPs for MP transport through mass-balance experiments to assess the extent to which the artificial retention of MP by FWP may interfere with testing and reduce its validity. Tests are conducted under different FWP components, pressure gradients, ionic strengths of solution, and MP sizes and concentrations. Results show baseline mass recoveries greater than 80% but declining for larger MPs (5 μm) and high ionic strengths. Agglomeration and filtration by filter paper were the primary causes of retention. Overall, FWPs proved effective for studying MP transport for particles of ≤1 μm at ionic strengths smaller than 0.03 M, with near-complete recovery achieved when avoiding filter papers. In addition, MP flow-through experiments conducted on sandy and bentonite clay soil samples confirmed FWP suitability as a soil column. Finally, guidance for its effective utilization for MP soil transport studies was provided.</p>","PeriodicalId":36,"journal":{"name":"环境科学与技术","volume":"59 28","pages":"14585–14596"},"PeriodicalIF":11.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Flexible Wall Permeameters for Research on Microplastic Transport in Soil: Validity, Advantages, and Constraints\",\"authors\":\"Yifei Gao,&nbsp;Surya Sujathan,&nbsp;Elizabeth A. Carter,&nbsp;David Airey and Abbas El-Zein*,&nbsp;\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acs.est.4c14274\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >Microplastics (MPs) are emerging contaminants detected in a range of ecosystems, including soils. Rigid wall columns are widely used to study MP transport in soil. However, they are limited in their ability to control boundary conditions and prevent sidewall leakage in studying low-permeability soils. Flexible wall permeameters (FWPs), commonly used for measuring soil permeability, offer more precise control of confining pressure and leakage, making them a promising alternative that remains under-explored. This study evaluates FWPs for MP transport through mass-balance experiments to assess the extent to which the artificial retention of MP by FWP may interfere with testing and reduce its validity. Tests are conducted under different FWP components, pressure gradients, ionic strengths of solution, and MP sizes and concentrations. Results show baseline mass recoveries greater than 80% but declining for larger MPs (5 μm) and high ionic strengths. Agglomeration and filtration by filter paper were the primary causes of retention. Overall, FWPs proved effective for studying MP transport for particles of ≤1 μm at ionic strengths smaller than 0.03 M, with near-complete recovery achieved when avoiding filter papers. In addition, MP flow-through experiments conducted on sandy and bentonite clay soil samples confirmed FWP suitability as a soil column. Finally, guidance for its effective utilization for MP soil transport studies was provided.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"环境科学与技术\",\"volume\":\"59 28\",\"pages\":\"14585–14596\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"环境科学与技术\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.4c14274\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"环境科学与技术","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.4c14274","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

微塑料(MPs)是在包括土壤在内的一系列生态系统中发现的新污染物。刚性墙柱被广泛应用于研究土壤中高分子物质的运移。然而,在低渗透土的研究中,它们在控制边界条件和防止侧壁渗漏方面的能力有限。柔性壁渗透仪(FWPs)通常用于测量土壤渗透性,可提供更精确的围压和泄漏控制,使其成为一种有前景的替代方案,但仍未得到充分开发。本研究通过质量平衡实验来评估FWP对MP转运的影响,以评估FWP对MP的人为滞留可能干扰测试并降低测试有效性的程度。试验在不同的FWP组分、压力梯度、溶液离子强度、MP的大小和浓度下进行。结果表明,在较大的MPs (5 μm)和较高的离子强度条件下,基线质量回收率大于80%。结块和滤纸过滤是造成滞留的主要原因。总的来说,在离子强度小于0.03 M的情况下,FWPs被证明是有效的,可以研究≤1 μm颗粒的MP输运,并且在避免滤纸的情况下几乎完全回收。此外,在砂土和膨润土粘土样品上进行的MP渗流实验证实了FWP作为土柱的适用性。最后,为其在MP土壤迁移研究中的有效利用提供了指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Flexible Wall Permeameters for Research on Microplastic Transport in Soil: Validity, Advantages, and Constraints

Flexible Wall Permeameters for Research on Microplastic Transport in Soil: Validity, Advantages, and Constraints

Microplastics (MPs) are emerging contaminants detected in a range of ecosystems, including soils. Rigid wall columns are widely used to study MP transport in soil. However, they are limited in their ability to control boundary conditions and prevent sidewall leakage in studying low-permeability soils. Flexible wall permeameters (FWPs), commonly used for measuring soil permeability, offer more precise control of confining pressure and leakage, making them a promising alternative that remains under-explored. This study evaluates FWPs for MP transport through mass-balance experiments to assess the extent to which the artificial retention of MP by FWP may interfere with testing and reduce its validity. Tests are conducted under different FWP components, pressure gradients, ionic strengths of solution, and MP sizes and concentrations. Results show baseline mass recoveries greater than 80% but declining for larger MPs (5 μm) and high ionic strengths. Agglomeration and filtration by filter paper were the primary causes of retention. Overall, FWPs proved effective for studying MP transport for particles of ≤1 μm at ionic strengths smaller than 0.03 M, with near-complete recovery achieved when avoiding filter papers. In addition, MP flow-through experiments conducted on sandy and bentonite clay soil samples confirmed FWP suitability as a soil column. Finally, guidance for its effective utilization for MP soil transport studies was provided.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
环境科学与技术
环境科学与技术 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
17.50
自引率
9.60%
发文量
12359
审稿时长
2.8 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Science & Technology (ES&T) is a co-sponsored academic and technical magazine by the Hubei Provincial Environmental Protection Bureau and the Hubei Provincial Academy of Environmental Sciences. Environmental Science & Technology (ES&T) holds the status of Chinese core journals, scientific papers source journals of China, Chinese Science Citation Database source journals, and Chinese Academic Journal Comprehensive Evaluation Database source journals. This publication focuses on the academic field of environmental protection, featuring articles related to environmental protection and technical advancements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信