Francesco Molinari , Gianluca Antonio Franco , Francesca Inferrera , Nicla Tranchida , Antonella Iaconis , Maria Rizzo , Davide Di Paola , Giuseppe Piccione , Enrico Gugliandolo
{"title":"环境因素影响山羊对全氟辛烷磺酸和草甘膦的免疫反应:放牧和圈养的差异","authors":"Francesco Molinari , Gianluca Antonio Franco , Francesca Inferrera , Nicla Tranchida , Antonella Iaconis , Maria Rizzo , Davide Di Paola , Giuseppe Piccione , Enrico Gugliandolo","doi":"10.1016/j.etap.2025.104754","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The aim of the present study was to investigate the interaction of EDs with both environmental and housing systems on the immune response of grazing/stall-fed goats. Chemical endocrine disruptors are reported to contaminate food chains. Some examples of ED chemicals are PFOS and glyphosate (GLY); both are reported to weaken immunity. Grazing, compared to stall feeding, results in a greater variety in diet and microorganisms’ animals are exposed to, strengthening their immune system. An ex vivo model was used: blood samples from both grazing and stall-fed goats were exposed to EDs to assess their impact on the function of immune cells and cytokine production. Outcomes indicated that goats which were fed under stall, having an immune response that was previously compromised, were more susceptible to the combined effect of PFOS and GLY, reflecting a higher rate of increase in oxidative stress. However, regarding inflammatory cytokines, both grazing and stall-fed groups reflected similar effects. It also shows how important housing systems are to modulate the impact on livestock immunity because of EDs, in the general interest of animal health and the safety of food derived therefrom, since EDs could exert risks to human health through contaminated consumable animal products. Long-term effects of EDs have to be clearly understood among livestock, and methods ought to be worked out concerning how to minimize the presence of these risks.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11775,"journal":{"name":"Environmental toxicology and pharmacology","volume":"117 ","pages":"Article 104754"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Environmental factors influence goat immune response to PFOS and glyphosate: Difference between grazing and stall-feeding\",\"authors\":\"Francesco Molinari , Gianluca Antonio Franco , Francesca Inferrera , Nicla Tranchida , Antonella Iaconis , Maria Rizzo , Davide Di Paola , Giuseppe Piccione , Enrico Gugliandolo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.etap.2025.104754\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The aim of the present study was to investigate the interaction of EDs with both environmental and housing systems on the immune response of grazing/stall-fed goats. Chemical endocrine disruptors are reported to contaminate food chains. Some examples of ED chemicals are PFOS and glyphosate (GLY); both are reported to weaken immunity. Grazing, compared to stall feeding, results in a greater variety in diet and microorganisms’ animals are exposed to, strengthening their immune system. An ex vivo model was used: blood samples from both grazing and stall-fed goats were exposed to EDs to assess their impact on the function of immune cells and cytokine production. Outcomes indicated that goats which were fed under stall, having an immune response that was previously compromised, were more susceptible to the combined effect of PFOS and GLY, reflecting a higher rate of increase in oxidative stress. However, regarding inflammatory cytokines, both grazing and stall-fed groups reflected similar effects. It also shows how important housing systems are to modulate the impact on livestock immunity because of EDs, in the general interest of animal health and the safety of food derived therefrom, since EDs could exert risks to human health through contaminated consumable animal products. Long-term effects of EDs have to be clearly understood among livestock, and methods ought to be worked out concerning how to minimize the presence of these risks.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11775,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental toxicology and pharmacology\",\"volume\":\"117 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104754\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental toxicology and pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1382668925001292\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental toxicology and pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1382668925001292","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Environmental factors influence goat immune response to PFOS and glyphosate: Difference between grazing and stall-feeding
The aim of the present study was to investigate the interaction of EDs with both environmental and housing systems on the immune response of grazing/stall-fed goats. Chemical endocrine disruptors are reported to contaminate food chains. Some examples of ED chemicals are PFOS and glyphosate (GLY); both are reported to weaken immunity. Grazing, compared to stall feeding, results in a greater variety in diet and microorganisms’ animals are exposed to, strengthening their immune system. An ex vivo model was used: blood samples from both grazing and stall-fed goats were exposed to EDs to assess their impact on the function of immune cells and cytokine production. Outcomes indicated that goats which were fed under stall, having an immune response that was previously compromised, were more susceptible to the combined effect of PFOS and GLY, reflecting a higher rate of increase in oxidative stress. However, regarding inflammatory cytokines, both grazing and stall-fed groups reflected similar effects. It also shows how important housing systems are to modulate the impact on livestock immunity because of EDs, in the general interest of animal health and the safety of food derived therefrom, since EDs could exert risks to human health through contaminated consumable animal products. Long-term effects of EDs have to be clearly understood among livestock, and methods ought to be worked out concerning how to minimize the presence of these risks.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology publishes the results of studies concerning toxic and pharmacological effects of (human and veterinary) drugs and of environmental contaminants in animals and man.
Areas of special interest are: molecular mechanisms of toxicity, biotransformation and toxicokinetics (including toxicokinetic modelling), molecular, biochemical and physiological mechanisms explaining differences in sensitivity between species and individuals, the characterisation of pathophysiological models and mechanisms involved in the development of effects and the identification of biological markers that can be used to study exposure and effects in man and animals.
In addition to full length papers, short communications, full-length reviews and mini-reviews, Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology will publish in depth assessments of special problem areas. The latter publications may exceed the length of a full length paper three to fourfold. A basic requirement is that the assessments are made under the auspices of international groups of leading experts in the fields concerned. The information examined may either consist of data that were already published, or of new data that were obtained within the framework of collaborative research programmes. Provision is also made for the acceptance of minireviews on (classes of) compounds, toxicities or mechanisms, debating recent advances in rapidly developing fields that fall within the scope of the journal.