青少年药物治疗后的死亡率:来自单一临床地点的21年随访。

Frontiers in child and adolescent psychiatry Pub Date : 2025-06-20 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/frcha.2025.1600101
Christian Thurstone, Cassandra Etzig, Eileen Chen, Haley D Seely, Ryan Loh
{"title":"青少年药物治疗后的死亡率:来自单一临床地点的21年随访。","authors":"Christian Thurstone, Cassandra Etzig, Eileen Chen, Haley D Seely, Ryan Loh","doi":"10.3389/frcha.2025.1600101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite known risks of substance use, mortality following adolescent substance treatment has not been examined. Knowing which youth have greatest risk and how youth die may inform future interventions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective chart review combined records from a single adolescent substance treatment program at an urban, safety-net health system (<i>n</i> = 2,957, ages 10-19 years) with a public health registry of deaths from 2003 to 2024. Records from the child mental health treatment program at the same health system (<i>n</i> = 4,400, ages 10-19 years) were used for comparison. The crude mortality rate per 100 person years was calculated for both samples for all 21 years. The standard mortality rate using death within one year of intake was also calculated. Finally, a logistic regression model was used to test the project hypotheses that self-identification as a person of color, no engagement in care, male sex at birth, and involvement in substance treatment would predict mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 92 (2.1%) adolescents in mental health treatment had a death record compared to 119 (4.0%) of adolescents in substance treatment. The crude mortality rate per 100 person years for adolescents in mental health treatment was 0.19 (CI: 0.18-0.20) compared to 0.37 (CI: 0.36-0.38) for adolescents in substance treatment. The standard mortality rate was 120 (32.7-308) for adolescents in mental health treatment compared to the standardized mortality rate of 944 (CI: 599-1,420) for adolescents in substance treatment. Accidental death, which includes overdose, was the most common cause of death in both groups. Results of the logistic regression showed male sex at birth (<i>p</i> = 0.0434, OR = 2.10, CI 1.06-4.53) and substance treatment (<i>p</i> = 0.0035, OR = 3.02, CI 1.47-6.55) as predictors of death within 5 years of treatment intake.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Adolescents in substance treatment compared to those in mental health treatment are more likely to die within 5 years of intake. Males compared to females are also more likely to die. Interventions to prevent overdose and other causes of mortality may be indicated.</p>","PeriodicalId":73074,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in child and adolescent psychiatry","volume":"4 ","pages":"1600101"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12226572/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mortality following adolescent substance treatment: 21-year follow-up from a single clinical site.\",\"authors\":\"Christian Thurstone, Cassandra Etzig, Eileen Chen, Haley D Seely, Ryan Loh\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/frcha.2025.1600101\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite known risks of substance use, mortality following adolescent substance treatment has not been examined. Knowing which youth have greatest risk and how youth die may inform future interventions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective chart review combined records from a single adolescent substance treatment program at an urban, safety-net health system (<i>n</i> = 2,957, ages 10-19 years) with a public health registry of deaths from 2003 to 2024. Records from the child mental health treatment program at the same health system (<i>n</i> = 4,400, ages 10-19 years) were used for comparison. The crude mortality rate per 100 person years was calculated for both samples for all 21 years. The standard mortality rate using death within one year of intake was also calculated. Finally, a logistic regression model was used to test the project hypotheses that self-identification as a person of color, no engagement in care, male sex at birth, and involvement in substance treatment would predict mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 92 (2.1%) adolescents in mental health treatment had a death record compared to 119 (4.0%) of adolescents in substance treatment. The crude mortality rate per 100 person years for adolescents in mental health treatment was 0.19 (CI: 0.18-0.20) compared to 0.37 (CI: 0.36-0.38) for adolescents in substance treatment. The standard mortality rate was 120 (32.7-308) for adolescents in mental health treatment compared to the standardized mortality rate of 944 (CI: 599-1,420) for adolescents in substance treatment. Accidental death, which includes overdose, was the most common cause of death in both groups. Results of the logistic regression showed male sex at birth (<i>p</i> = 0.0434, OR = 2.10, CI 1.06-4.53) and substance treatment (<i>p</i> = 0.0035, OR = 3.02, CI 1.47-6.55) as predictors of death within 5 years of treatment intake.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Adolescents in substance treatment compared to those in mental health treatment are more likely to die within 5 years of intake. Males compared to females are also more likely to die. Interventions to prevent overdose and other causes of mortality may be indicated.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73074,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in child and adolescent psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"4 \",\"pages\":\"1600101\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12226572/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in child and adolescent psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/frcha.2025.1600101\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in child and adolescent psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frcha.2025.1600101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管已知药物使用的风险,青少年药物治疗后的死亡率尚未检查。了解哪些青年风险最大以及青年如何死亡,可为今后的干预措施提供信息。方法:本回顾性图表回顾了2003年至2024年城市安全网卫生系统中单一青少年药物治疗项目的综合记录(n = 2957,年龄10-19岁)和公共卫生死亡登记。来自同一卫生系统的儿童心理健康治疗项目的记录(n = 4400,年龄10-19岁)用于比较。计算了这两个样本在所有21年中每100人年的粗死亡率。使用摄入后一年内的死亡率也计算了标准死亡率。最后,使用逻辑回归模型来检验项目假设,即自我认同为有色人种、不参与护理、出生时为男性和参与物质治疗会预测死亡率。结果:总体而言,92名(2.1%)接受精神健康治疗的青少年有死亡记录,而119名(4.0%)接受物质治疗的青少年有死亡记录。接受精神健康治疗的青少年每百人年粗死亡率为0.19 (CI: 0.18-0.20),而接受物质治疗的青少年为0.37 (CI: 0.36-0.38)。接受精神健康治疗的青少年的标准死亡率为120(32.7-308),而接受药物治疗的青少年的标准死亡率为944 (CI: 599-1,420)。意外死亡,包括过量服用,是两组中最常见的死亡原因。logistic回归结果显示,出生时男性(p = 0.0434, OR = 2.10, CI 1.06-4.53)和药物治疗(p = 0.0035, OR = 3.02, CI 1.47-6.55)是治疗后5年内死亡的预测因子。结论:与接受精神健康治疗的青少年相比,接受药物治疗的青少年更有可能在5年内死亡。与女性相比,男性也更容易死亡。可能会指出预防用药过量和其他死亡原因的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mortality following adolescent substance treatment: 21-year follow-up from a single clinical site.

Background: Despite known risks of substance use, mortality following adolescent substance treatment has not been examined. Knowing which youth have greatest risk and how youth die may inform future interventions.

Methods: This retrospective chart review combined records from a single adolescent substance treatment program at an urban, safety-net health system (n = 2,957, ages 10-19 years) with a public health registry of deaths from 2003 to 2024. Records from the child mental health treatment program at the same health system (n = 4,400, ages 10-19 years) were used for comparison. The crude mortality rate per 100 person years was calculated for both samples for all 21 years. The standard mortality rate using death within one year of intake was also calculated. Finally, a logistic regression model was used to test the project hypotheses that self-identification as a person of color, no engagement in care, male sex at birth, and involvement in substance treatment would predict mortality.

Results: Overall, 92 (2.1%) adolescents in mental health treatment had a death record compared to 119 (4.0%) of adolescents in substance treatment. The crude mortality rate per 100 person years for adolescents in mental health treatment was 0.19 (CI: 0.18-0.20) compared to 0.37 (CI: 0.36-0.38) for adolescents in substance treatment. The standard mortality rate was 120 (32.7-308) for adolescents in mental health treatment compared to the standardized mortality rate of 944 (CI: 599-1,420) for adolescents in substance treatment. Accidental death, which includes overdose, was the most common cause of death in both groups. Results of the logistic regression showed male sex at birth (p = 0.0434, OR = 2.10, CI 1.06-4.53) and substance treatment (p = 0.0035, OR = 3.02, CI 1.47-6.55) as predictors of death within 5 years of treatment intake.

Conclusions: Adolescents in substance treatment compared to those in mental health treatment are more likely to die within 5 years of intake. Males compared to females are also more likely to die. Interventions to prevent overdose and other causes of mortality may be indicated.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信