美国儿童虐待导致烫伤的特点:系统回顾。

IF 1.7 4区 哲学 Q2 ETHICS
Wendy C Shields, Evelyn Shiang, Marisa Koontz, Jon Vernick, Shannon Frattaroli
{"title":"美国儿童虐待导致烫伤的特点:系统回顾。","authors":"Wendy C Shields, Evelyn Shiang, Marisa Koontz, Jon Vernick, Shannon Frattaroli","doi":"10.1017/jme.2025.10111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Hot tap water is the most common source of scald injuries, representing a quarter of all scald injuries requiring hospitalization in the United States. Children and older adults are at increased risk of scald burns. Evidence suggests that poor knowledge of burn risks and treatment among parents and the public may contribute to the burden of scald injuries in children. Medical and injury surveillance categorizes most scald burns as unintentional injuries. However, scald burns can also lead to investigation by the justice system if the injury is suspected to result from abuse or neglect. The Department of Justice recommends assessing criminal intent in childhood scald burns based on traditional indicators derived from medical research: burn uniformity, areas of sparing, burn locations, family history, and speed of medical care. In this study, we present an overview of the existing literature on intentional scald burns in children caused by hot tap water in order to improve their identification and prevention. This systematic review aims to answer two questions: (1) What are the indicators of intentional scald burns in children according to the literature and (2) Is the body of evidence for common indicators of intentional scald burns subject to bias?</p>","PeriodicalId":50165,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Characteristics of Scald Burns Caused by Child Abuse in the United States: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Wendy C Shields, Evelyn Shiang, Marisa Koontz, Jon Vernick, Shannon Frattaroli\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/jme.2025.10111\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Hot tap water is the most common source of scald injuries, representing a quarter of all scald injuries requiring hospitalization in the United States. Children and older adults are at increased risk of scald burns. Evidence suggests that poor knowledge of burn risks and treatment among parents and the public may contribute to the burden of scald injuries in children. Medical and injury surveillance categorizes most scald burns as unintentional injuries. However, scald burns can also lead to investigation by the justice system if the injury is suspected to result from abuse or neglect. The Department of Justice recommends assessing criminal intent in childhood scald burns based on traditional indicators derived from medical research: burn uniformity, areas of sparing, burn locations, family history, and speed of medical care. In this study, we present an overview of the existing literature on intentional scald burns in children caused by hot tap water in order to improve their identification and prevention. This systematic review aims to answer two questions: (1) What are the indicators of intentional scald burns in children according to the literature and (2) Is the body of evidence for common indicators of intentional scald burns subject to bias?</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50165,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-12\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/jme.2025.10111\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ETHICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/jme.2025.10111","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

热水是最常见的烫伤来源,占美国所有需要住院治疗的烫伤的四分之一。儿童和老年人发生烫伤的风险增加。有证据表明,父母和公众对烧伤风险和治疗的不了解可能会造成儿童烫伤的负担。医疗和伤害监测将大多数烫伤烧伤归类为非故意伤害。然而,如果烫伤被怀疑是虐待或忽视造成的,也可能导致司法系统的调查。司法部建议根据医学研究得出的传统指标评估儿童烫伤的犯罪意图:烧伤均匀性、保留区域、烧伤位置、家族史和医疗护理速度。在本研究中,我们对现有的关于热水引起的儿童故意烫伤的文献进行了综述,以提高其识别和预防。本系统综述旨在回答两个问题:(1)根据文献,儿童故意烫伤的指标是什么?(2)关于故意烫伤的常见指标的证据是否存在偏倚?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Characteristics of Scald Burns Caused by Child Abuse in the United States: A Systematic Review.

Hot tap water is the most common source of scald injuries, representing a quarter of all scald injuries requiring hospitalization in the United States. Children and older adults are at increased risk of scald burns. Evidence suggests that poor knowledge of burn risks and treatment among parents and the public may contribute to the burden of scald injuries in children. Medical and injury surveillance categorizes most scald burns as unintentional injuries. However, scald burns can also lead to investigation by the justice system if the injury is suspected to result from abuse or neglect. The Department of Justice recommends assessing criminal intent in childhood scald burns based on traditional indicators derived from medical research: burn uniformity, areas of sparing, burn locations, family history, and speed of medical care. In this study, we present an overview of the existing literature on intentional scald burns in children caused by hot tap water in order to improve their identification and prevention. This systematic review aims to answer two questions: (1) What are the indicators of intentional scald burns in children according to the literature and (2) Is the body of evidence for common indicators of intentional scald burns subject to bias?

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics
Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics 医学-医学:法
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
4.80%
发文量
70
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Material published in The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics (JLME) contributes to the educational mission of The American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics, covering public health, health disparities, patient safety and quality of care, and biomedical science and research. It provides articles on such timely topics as health care quality and access, managed care, pain relief, genetics, child/maternal health, reproductive health, informed consent, assisted dying, ethics committees, HIV/AIDS, and public health. Symposium issues review significant policy developments, health law court decisions, and books.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信