通过在一系列新方法(NAMs)中测试全氟烷基和多氟烷基物质(PFAS)库获得的见解。

IF 8.1 2区 医学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Grace Patlewicz, Richard Judson, Katie Paul Friedman, Barbara A Wetmore, Michael J DeVito, Joshua A Harrill, Kelly E Carstens, Keith A Houck, John F Wambaugh, Stephanie Padilla, Katy N Britton, Timothy J Shafer, Sigmund Degitz, Jo Nyffeler, Anna Kreutz, Ann M Richard, Antony J Williams, Katherine Coutros, Michael W Hornung, John Cowden, Logan J Everett, Clinton M Willis, Marci G Smeltz, M Scott Clifton, Madison Feshuk, Jonathan T Wall, Risa R Sayre, Jason Brown, Russell S Thomas
{"title":"通过在一系列新方法(NAMs)中测试全氟烷基和多氟烷基物质(PFAS)库获得的见解。","authors":"Grace Patlewicz, Richard Judson, Katie Paul Friedman, Barbara A Wetmore, Michael J DeVito, Joshua A Harrill, Kelly E Carstens, Keith A Houck, John F Wambaugh, Stephanie Padilla, Katy N Britton, Timothy J Shafer, Sigmund Degitz, Jo Nyffeler, Anna Kreutz, Ann M Richard, Antony J Williams, Katherine Coutros, Michael W Hornung, John Cowden, Logan J Everett, Clinton M Willis, Marci G Smeltz, M Scott Clifton, Madison Feshuk, Jonathan T Wall, Risa R Sayre, Jason Brown, Russell S Thomas","doi":"10.1080/10937404.2025.2521615","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) comprise a large class of human-made chemicals that are in widespread use and present concerns for persistence, bioaccumulation and toxicity. Whilst a handful of PFAS have been characterized for their hazard profiles, the vast majority of PFAS have not been extensively studied. A comprehensive evaluation to characterize the hazard profiles of the thousands of available PFAS would require extensive resources in terms of cost, number of animals and time. An alternative and more efficient approach is to develop a structural chemical categorization approach to prioritize which PFAS or categories of PFAS should be subject to additional study. To that end, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), in collaboration with the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) Division of Translational Toxicology (DTT), initiated a research project in 2018 to screen approximately 150 PFAS through a battery of alternative model organisms, <i>in vitro</i> cell and biochemical assays, and <i>in vitro</i> toxico kinetic (TK) assays in order to inform chemical category and read-across approaches. The aim of this review summarizes the experimental testing undertaken, how data were processed, what insights were derived from a category perspective and how these might potentially inform subsequent tiered testing.</p>","PeriodicalId":49971,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health-Part B-Critical Reviews","volume":" ","pages":"1-69"},"PeriodicalIF":8.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Insights derived from testing a library of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in a battery of new approach methods (NAMs).\",\"authors\":\"Grace Patlewicz, Richard Judson, Katie Paul Friedman, Barbara A Wetmore, Michael J DeVito, Joshua A Harrill, Kelly E Carstens, Keith A Houck, John F Wambaugh, Stephanie Padilla, Katy N Britton, Timothy J Shafer, Sigmund Degitz, Jo Nyffeler, Anna Kreutz, Ann M Richard, Antony J Williams, Katherine Coutros, Michael W Hornung, John Cowden, Logan J Everett, Clinton M Willis, Marci G Smeltz, M Scott Clifton, Madison Feshuk, Jonathan T Wall, Risa R Sayre, Jason Brown, Russell S Thomas\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10937404.2025.2521615\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) comprise a large class of human-made chemicals that are in widespread use and present concerns for persistence, bioaccumulation and toxicity. Whilst a handful of PFAS have been characterized for their hazard profiles, the vast majority of PFAS have not been extensively studied. A comprehensive evaluation to characterize the hazard profiles of the thousands of available PFAS would require extensive resources in terms of cost, number of animals and time. An alternative and more efficient approach is to develop a structural chemical categorization approach to prioritize which PFAS or categories of PFAS should be subject to additional study. To that end, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), in collaboration with the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) Division of Translational Toxicology (DTT), initiated a research project in 2018 to screen approximately 150 PFAS through a battery of alternative model organisms, <i>in vitro</i> cell and biochemical assays, and <i>in vitro</i> toxico kinetic (TK) assays in order to inform chemical category and read-across approaches. The aim of this review summarizes the experimental testing undertaken, how data were processed, what insights were derived from a category perspective and how these might potentially inform subsequent tiered testing.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49971,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health-Part B-Critical Reviews\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-69\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health-Part B-Critical Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10937404.2025.2521615\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health-Part B-Critical Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10937404.2025.2521615","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

全氟烷基和多氟烷基物质(PFAS)是一类广泛使用的人造化学品,存在持久性、生物蓄积性和毒性问题。虽然少数PFAS已被描述为其危害概况,但绝大多数PFAS尚未得到广泛研究。就成本、动物数量和时间而言,对数千种现有PFAS的危害特征进行全面评价将需要大量资源。另一种更有效的方法是制定一种结构化学分类方法,以优先考虑应进行进一步研究的PFAS或PFAS类别。为此,美国环境保护署(EPA)与美国国家环境健康科学研究所(NIEHS)转化毒理学部(DTT)合作,于2018年启动了一项研究项目,通过一系列替代模式生物、体外细胞和生化分析以及体外毒性动力学(TK)分析筛选大约150种PFAS,以便为化学类别和跨读方法提供信息。本综述的目的是总结所进行的实验测试,如何处理数据,从类别角度得出的见解以及这些见解如何可能为后续分层测试提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Insights derived from testing a library of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in a battery of new approach methods (NAMs).

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) comprise a large class of human-made chemicals that are in widespread use and present concerns for persistence, bioaccumulation and toxicity. Whilst a handful of PFAS have been characterized for their hazard profiles, the vast majority of PFAS have not been extensively studied. A comprehensive evaluation to characterize the hazard profiles of the thousands of available PFAS would require extensive resources in terms of cost, number of animals and time. An alternative and more efficient approach is to develop a structural chemical categorization approach to prioritize which PFAS or categories of PFAS should be subject to additional study. To that end, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), in collaboration with the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) Division of Translational Toxicology (DTT), initiated a research project in 2018 to screen approximately 150 PFAS through a battery of alternative model organisms, in vitro cell and biochemical assays, and in vitro toxico kinetic (TK) assays in order to inform chemical category and read-across approaches. The aim of this review summarizes the experimental testing undertaken, how data were processed, what insights were derived from a category perspective and how these might potentially inform subsequent tiered testing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
6.90%
发文量
13
审稿时长
>24 weeks
期刊介绍: "Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health: Part B - Critical Reviews" is an academic journal published by Taylor & Francis, focusing on the critical examination of research in the areas of environmental exposure and population health. With an ISSN identifier of 1093-7404, this journal has established itself as a significant source of scholarly content in the field of toxicology and environmental health. Since its inception, the journal has published over 424 articles that have garnered 35,097 citations, reflecting its impact and relevance in the scientific community. Known for its comprehensive reviews, the journal also goes by the names "Critical Reviews" and "Journal of Toxicology & Environmental Health, Part B, Critical Reviews." The journal's mission is to provide a platform for in-depth analysis and critical discussion of the latest findings in toxicology, environmental health, and related disciplines. By doing so, it contributes to the advancement of knowledge and understanding of the complex interactions between environmental factors and human health, aiding in the development of strategies to protect and improve public health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信