nab-紫杉醇加吉西他滨治疗转移性胰腺癌的真实预测模型。

IF 1.3 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Wspolczesna Onkologia-Contemporary Oncology Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-30 DOI:10.5114/wo.2025.150080
Agata Adamczuk-Nurzyńska, Paweł Nurzyński, Melania Brzozowska, Maciej Jewczak, Andrzej Śliwczyński
{"title":"nab-紫杉醇加吉西他滨治疗转移性胰腺癌的真实预测模型。","authors":"Agata Adamczuk-Nurzyńska, Paweł Nurzyński, Melania Brzozowska, Maciej Jewczak, Andrzej Śliwczyński","doi":"10.5114/wo.2025.150080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In 2020 in Poland a total of 3 589 people had pancreatic cancer (PC). Only 20% of patients were diagnosed with surgical disease. New therapeutic options that demonstrate statistically significant improvements in overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) are still being sought. However, the assessment of treatment efficacy and safety in non-selected patients in a real-life setting may provide useful information to support decision-making processes in routine practice.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The aim of the clinical study was a retrospective analysis of the medical history of 182 patients with the diagnosis of metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPC), who were treated with combination treatment of nab-paclitaxel with gemcitabine (GEM-NAB) between February 2017 and September 2023. Our study also aimed to identify important population-based predictors for survival in patients diagnosed with mPC.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median age was 66 years (range 37-84 years). Median OS was 9.2 months (95% CI: 8.3-10.03), and median PFS was 5.47 months (95% CI: 4.83-6.1); 26 patients achieved either a partial or complete response (overall response rate 14%). GEM-NAB was well tolerated. The most common adverse events were alopecia, fatigue, neutropenia, anemia, and peripheral neuropathy. This study identified specific clinical and laboratory parameters (neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio, antigen Ca 19.9, mechanical jaundice, peripheral neuropathy and 2<sup>nd</sup> and 3<sup>rd</sup> lines of treatment) as independent prognostic factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results confirm the efficacy and tolerability of GEM-NAB as standard first-line treatment in patients with mPC. Among the factors having the greatest impact on OS was the 3<sup>rd</sup> line of treatment, and for PFS the presence of peripheral neuropathy.</p>","PeriodicalId":49354,"journal":{"name":"Wspolczesna Onkologia-Contemporary Oncology","volume":"29 2","pages":"171-178"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12224266/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Real-world predictive models for survival with nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine in metastatic pancreatic cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Agata Adamczuk-Nurzyńska, Paweł Nurzyński, Melania Brzozowska, Maciej Jewczak, Andrzej Śliwczyński\",\"doi\":\"10.5114/wo.2025.150080\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In 2020 in Poland a total of 3 589 people had pancreatic cancer (PC). Only 20% of patients were diagnosed with surgical disease. New therapeutic options that demonstrate statistically significant improvements in overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) are still being sought. However, the assessment of treatment efficacy and safety in non-selected patients in a real-life setting may provide useful information to support decision-making processes in routine practice.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The aim of the clinical study was a retrospective analysis of the medical history of 182 patients with the diagnosis of metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPC), who were treated with combination treatment of nab-paclitaxel with gemcitabine (GEM-NAB) between February 2017 and September 2023. Our study also aimed to identify important population-based predictors for survival in patients diagnosed with mPC.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median age was 66 years (range 37-84 years). Median OS was 9.2 months (95% CI: 8.3-10.03), and median PFS was 5.47 months (95% CI: 4.83-6.1); 26 patients achieved either a partial or complete response (overall response rate 14%). GEM-NAB was well tolerated. The most common adverse events were alopecia, fatigue, neutropenia, anemia, and peripheral neuropathy. This study identified specific clinical and laboratory parameters (neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio, antigen Ca 19.9, mechanical jaundice, peripheral neuropathy and 2<sup>nd</sup> and 3<sup>rd</sup> lines of treatment) as independent prognostic factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results confirm the efficacy and tolerability of GEM-NAB as standard first-line treatment in patients with mPC. Among the factors having the greatest impact on OS was the 3<sup>rd</sup> line of treatment, and for PFS the presence of peripheral neuropathy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49354,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Wspolczesna Onkologia-Contemporary Oncology\",\"volume\":\"29 2\",\"pages\":\"171-178\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12224266/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Wspolczesna Onkologia-Contemporary Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5114/wo.2025.150080\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wspolczesna Onkologia-Contemporary Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/wo.2025.150080","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2020年,波兰共有3589人患有胰腺癌(PC)。只有20%的患者被诊断为外科疾病。在总体生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)方面表现出统计学上显著改善的新治疗方案仍在寻求中。然而,在现实生活中对非选择性患者的治疗效果和安全性的评估可能为日常实践中的决策过程提供有用的信息。材料与方法:临床研究的目的是回顾性分析2017年2月至2023年9月期间接受纳布-紫杉醇联合吉西他滨(GEM-NAB)治疗的182例转移性胰腺癌(mPC)患者的病史。我们的研究还旨在确定诊断为mPC的患者生存的重要的基于人群的预测因素。结果:中位年龄66岁(37 ~ 84岁)。中位OS为9.2个月(95% CI: 8.3-10.03),中位PFS为5.47个月(95% CI: 4.83-6.1);26例患者获得部分或完全缓解(总缓解率14%)。GEM-NAB耐受性良好。最常见的不良事件是脱发、疲劳、中性粒细胞减少、贫血和周围神经病变。该研究确定了特定的临床和实验室参数(中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值、抗原Ca 19.9、机械性黄疸、周围神经病变和二线和三线治疗)作为独立的预后因素。结论:我们的研究结果证实了GEM-NAB作为mPC患者标准一线治疗的疗效和耐受性。对OS影响最大的因素之一是第三线治疗,对于PFS来说,周围神经病变的存在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Real-world predictive models for survival with nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine in metastatic pancreatic cancer.

Introduction: In 2020 in Poland a total of 3 589 people had pancreatic cancer (PC). Only 20% of patients were diagnosed with surgical disease. New therapeutic options that demonstrate statistically significant improvements in overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) are still being sought. However, the assessment of treatment efficacy and safety in non-selected patients in a real-life setting may provide useful information to support decision-making processes in routine practice.

Material and methods: The aim of the clinical study was a retrospective analysis of the medical history of 182 patients with the diagnosis of metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPC), who were treated with combination treatment of nab-paclitaxel with gemcitabine (GEM-NAB) between February 2017 and September 2023. Our study also aimed to identify important population-based predictors for survival in patients diagnosed with mPC.

Results: The median age was 66 years (range 37-84 years). Median OS was 9.2 months (95% CI: 8.3-10.03), and median PFS was 5.47 months (95% CI: 4.83-6.1); 26 patients achieved either a partial or complete response (overall response rate 14%). GEM-NAB was well tolerated. The most common adverse events were alopecia, fatigue, neutropenia, anemia, and peripheral neuropathy. This study identified specific clinical and laboratory parameters (neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio, antigen Ca 19.9, mechanical jaundice, peripheral neuropathy and 2nd and 3rd lines of treatment) as independent prognostic factors.

Conclusions: Our results confirm the efficacy and tolerability of GEM-NAB as standard first-line treatment in patients with mPC. Among the factors having the greatest impact on OS was the 3rd line of treatment, and for PFS the presence of peripheral neuropathy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Contemporary Oncology is a journal aimed at oncologists, oncological surgeons, hematologists, radiologists, pathologists, radiotherapists, palliative care specialists, psychologists, nutritionists, and representatives of any other professions, whose interests are related to cancer. Manuscripts devoted to basic research in the field of oncology are also welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信