运动引起的神经肌肉疲劳的评估方法:范围综述。

IF 1.6 Q3 SPORT SCIENCES
International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy Pub Date : 2025-07-02 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.26603/001c.141230
Jose L Muñoz-Gracia, Eduard Alentorn-Geli, Martí Casals, Timothy E Hewett, Ernest Baiget
{"title":"运动引起的神经肌肉疲劳的评估方法:范围综述。","authors":"Jose L Muñoz-Gracia, Eduard Alentorn-Geli, Martí Casals, Timothy E Hewett, Ernest Baiget","doi":"10.26603/001c.141230","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Neuromuscular fatigue (NMF) has been defined as the exercise-induced performance decrease associated with muscular activity. # Purpose The primary aim was to identify the available evidence regarding the testing tasks used to assess NMF in the lower limbs and to determine the most commonly used test in specific sports. The secondary aim was to group the tests found according to the type of sport. # Study Design Scoping review. # Methods A literature search was conducted in PubMed, ScienceDirect, SportDiscus, and Web of Science databases. Search terms were \"neuromuscular fatigue\" and (\"test\" or \"tests\" or \"testing task\" or \"task\"). Studies that analyzed healthy humans, voluntary contractions, and participants under 50 years old were included. Studies in which the main focus was not NMF, the lower limbs were not analyzed, the knee joint was not involved, the pre-post analysis of fatigue was not used, or there was no sport fatigue protocol between tests were excluded. The PRISMA-ScR guidelines were followed. # Results A total of 97 studies were included. Most of these included males (68.0%) and professional athletes in their samples (46.4%) . The data most commonly studied for NMF were athletes from team sports (74.2%), specifically soccer (32.0%) and rugby (18.6%). Matches and trainings sessions were the fatiguing protocols (59.8%), whereas vertical jumps (82.5%), measured by force platforms (77.5%), was the test most commonly used. The most commonly evaluated parameters were jump height (75.0%) and peak power (41.3%). Tests varied different according to the sport, and vertical jumps (77.8%), and sprints (15.3%) were the tests most commonly used for the athletes in team sports. For athletes in individual sports, vertical jumps (72.0%) and isometric knee extension/knee flexion (24.0%) were most utilized. # Conclusions Different fatigue protocols, test tasks, materials, and variables are used to assess NMF. Veritcal jump is the most commonly utilized test task for athletes of both team and individual sports. It appears necessary to choose the most appropriate test tasks according to each type of sport.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level 2b.</p>","PeriodicalId":47892,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy","volume":"20 7","pages":"943-956"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12222557/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment Methods of Sport-Induced Neuromuscular Fatigue: A Scoping Review.\",\"authors\":\"Jose L Muñoz-Gracia, Eduard Alentorn-Geli, Martí Casals, Timothy E Hewett, Ernest Baiget\",\"doi\":\"10.26603/001c.141230\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Neuromuscular fatigue (NMF) has been defined as the exercise-induced performance decrease associated with muscular activity. # Purpose The primary aim was to identify the available evidence regarding the testing tasks used to assess NMF in the lower limbs and to determine the most commonly used test in specific sports. The secondary aim was to group the tests found according to the type of sport. # Study Design Scoping review. # Methods A literature search was conducted in PubMed, ScienceDirect, SportDiscus, and Web of Science databases. Search terms were \\\"neuromuscular fatigue\\\" and (\\\"test\\\" or \\\"tests\\\" or \\\"testing task\\\" or \\\"task\\\"). Studies that analyzed healthy humans, voluntary contractions, and participants under 50 years old were included. Studies in which the main focus was not NMF, the lower limbs were not analyzed, the knee joint was not involved, the pre-post analysis of fatigue was not used, or there was no sport fatigue protocol between tests were excluded. The PRISMA-ScR guidelines were followed. # Results A total of 97 studies were included. Most of these included males (68.0%) and professional athletes in their samples (46.4%) . The data most commonly studied for NMF were athletes from team sports (74.2%), specifically soccer (32.0%) and rugby (18.6%). Matches and trainings sessions were the fatiguing protocols (59.8%), whereas vertical jumps (82.5%), measured by force platforms (77.5%), was the test most commonly used. The most commonly evaluated parameters were jump height (75.0%) and peak power (41.3%). Tests varied different according to the sport, and vertical jumps (77.8%), and sprints (15.3%) were the tests most commonly used for the athletes in team sports. For athletes in individual sports, vertical jumps (72.0%) and isometric knee extension/knee flexion (24.0%) were most utilized. # Conclusions Different fatigue protocols, test tasks, materials, and variables are used to assess NMF. Veritcal jump is the most commonly utilized test task for athletes of both team and individual sports. It appears necessary to choose the most appropriate test tasks according to each type of sport.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level 2b.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47892,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy\",\"volume\":\"20 7\",\"pages\":\"943-956\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12222557/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26603/001c.141230\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26603/001c.141230","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:神经肌肉疲劳(NMF)被定义为运动引起的与肌肉活动相关的性能下降。主要目的是确定用于评估下肢NMF的测试任务的现有证据,并确定特定运动中最常用的测试。第二个目的是根据运动类型对检测结果进行分组。#研究设计范围审查。方法在PubMed、ScienceDirect、SportDiscus和Web of Science数据库中进行文献检索。搜索词是“神经肌肉疲劳”和(“测试”或“测试”或“测试任务”或“任务”)。研究分析了健康人、自愿宫缩和50岁以下的参与者。研究的主要焦点不是NMF,没有分析下肢,没有涉及膝关节,没有使用疲劳的前后分析,或者在试验之间没有运动疲劳协议被排除。遵循PRISMA-ScR指南。共纳入97项研究。其中男性占68.0%,职业运动员占46.4%。NMF最常研究的数据是来自团队运动的运动员(74.2%),特别是足球(32.0%)和橄榄球(18.6%)。比赛和训练课程是疲劳方案(59.8%),而垂直跳跃(82.5%)是最常用的测试,由力平台测量(77.5%)。最常见的评价参数为跳跃高度(75.0%)和峰值功率(41.3%)。不同项目的测试结果不同,团体项目运动员最常进行的测试是垂直跳远(77.8%)和短跑(15.3%)。在个人项目中,运动员使用最多的是垂直跳跃(72.0%)和等距膝关节伸展/屈曲(24.0%)。不同的疲劳方案、测试任务、材料和变量用于评估NMF。垂直跳远是团体和个人项目中最常用的测试项目。似乎有必要根据每种运动类型选择最合适的测试任务。证据等级:2b级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment Methods of Sport-Induced Neuromuscular Fatigue: A Scoping Review.

Background: Neuromuscular fatigue (NMF) has been defined as the exercise-induced performance decrease associated with muscular activity. # Purpose The primary aim was to identify the available evidence regarding the testing tasks used to assess NMF in the lower limbs and to determine the most commonly used test in specific sports. The secondary aim was to group the tests found according to the type of sport. # Study Design Scoping review. # Methods A literature search was conducted in PubMed, ScienceDirect, SportDiscus, and Web of Science databases. Search terms were "neuromuscular fatigue" and ("test" or "tests" or "testing task" or "task"). Studies that analyzed healthy humans, voluntary contractions, and participants under 50 years old were included. Studies in which the main focus was not NMF, the lower limbs were not analyzed, the knee joint was not involved, the pre-post analysis of fatigue was not used, or there was no sport fatigue protocol between tests were excluded. The PRISMA-ScR guidelines were followed. # Results A total of 97 studies were included. Most of these included males (68.0%) and professional athletes in their samples (46.4%) . The data most commonly studied for NMF were athletes from team sports (74.2%), specifically soccer (32.0%) and rugby (18.6%). Matches and trainings sessions were the fatiguing protocols (59.8%), whereas vertical jumps (82.5%), measured by force platforms (77.5%), was the test most commonly used. The most commonly evaluated parameters were jump height (75.0%) and peak power (41.3%). Tests varied different according to the sport, and vertical jumps (77.8%), and sprints (15.3%) were the tests most commonly used for the athletes in team sports. For athletes in individual sports, vertical jumps (72.0%) and isometric knee extension/knee flexion (24.0%) were most utilized. # Conclusions Different fatigue protocols, test tasks, materials, and variables are used to assess NMF. Veritcal jump is the most commonly utilized test task for athletes of both team and individual sports. It appears necessary to choose the most appropriate test tasks according to each type of sport.

Level of evidence: Level 2b.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
124
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信