加纳阿散蒂地区以垃圾桶为中心的固体废物分类系统效率评估。

Q2 Environmental Science
The Scientific World Journal Pub Date : 2025-06-27 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1155/tswj/6169623
Lyndon N A Sackey, David Nii Ayi Anum, Ekua Yekowah Ampiah, Charlotte Adwoa Marfo, Kodwo Amos, Nana Ama Antwiwaa Ahorlley, Lawrencia S Y Agyemang, Hamlyn Samuel Tetteh Addy
{"title":"加纳阿散蒂地区以垃圾桶为中心的固体废物分类系统效率评估。","authors":"Lyndon N A Sackey, David Nii Ayi Anum, Ekua Yekowah Ampiah, Charlotte Adwoa Marfo, Kodwo Amos, Nana Ama Antwiwaa Ahorlley, Lawrencia S Y Agyemang, Hamlyn Samuel Tetteh Addy","doi":"10.1155/tswj/6169623","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology (KNUST) established a waste segregation system that provided plastic waste to feed a plastic recycling facility to improve solid waste management in 2017. However, since the establishment of the segregation system, there has not been any assessment to ascertain its efficiency. Hence, this research seeks to assess the efficiency of KNUST's waste segregation system. The study utilized a quantitative research approach method to assess the efficiency of the segregation system. A total of 500 randomly selected participants, including students, lecturers, administrators, cleaners, and other staff, participated in the survey. Also, to ascertain the efficiency of the segregation system, through stratified random sampling, 67 bins were selected for the segregation of plastic waste. The results indicated poor attitudes towards segregation, low adherence, and ineffectiveness. Analysis of the waste components generated on campus revealed that 64.7% of the participants generated paper as part of the total waste produced, a substantial 83.5% generated plastics, 82.5% generated food waste, and 28.2% generated tins/cans. A corresponding 9.4%, 11.24%, and 4.4% generated fiber bags, glass, and other waste types, respectively. The plastic waste stream consists of polyethylene terephthalate (PET), high-density polyethylene (HDPE), low-density polyethylene (LDPE), and polystyrene (PS). Of the participants, 43.9% knew about waste segregation on campus, and 75.5% had seen the bins. Of the participants, 56.5% knew what the color codes of the bins meant. Barriers to effective segregation included low publicity, insufficient bins, and low monitoring. Management should intensify publicity, introduce more bins, and diversify the system.</p>","PeriodicalId":22985,"journal":{"name":"The Scientific World Journal","volume":"2025 ","pages":"6169623"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12227260/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the Efficiency of Bin-Centered Solid Waste Segregation System in Ashanti Region, Ghana.\",\"authors\":\"Lyndon N A Sackey, David Nii Ayi Anum, Ekua Yekowah Ampiah, Charlotte Adwoa Marfo, Kodwo Amos, Nana Ama Antwiwaa Ahorlley, Lawrencia S Y Agyemang, Hamlyn Samuel Tetteh Addy\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/tswj/6169623\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology (KNUST) established a waste segregation system that provided plastic waste to feed a plastic recycling facility to improve solid waste management in 2017. However, since the establishment of the segregation system, there has not been any assessment to ascertain its efficiency. Hence, this research seeks to assess the efficiency of KNUST's waste segregation system. The study utilized a quantitative research approach method to assess the efficiency of the segregation system. A total of 500 randomly selected participants, including students, lecturers, administrators, cleaners, and other staff, participated in the survey. Also, to ascertain the efficiency of the segregation system, through stratified random sampling, 67 bins were selected for the segregation of plastic waste. The results indicated poor attitudes towards segregation, low adherence, and ineffectiveness. Analysis of the waste components generated on campus revealed that 64.7% of the participants generated paper as part of the total waste produced, a substantial 83.5% generated plastics, 82.5% generated food waste, and 28.2% generated tins/cans. A corresponding 9.4%, 11.24%, and 4.4% generated fiber bags, glass, and other waste types, respectively. The plastic waste stream consists of polyethylene terephthalate (PET), high-density polyethylene (HDPE), low-density polyethylene (LDPE), and polystyrene (PS). Of the participants, 43.9% knew about waste segregation on campus, and 75.5% had seen the bins. Of the participants, 56.5% knew what the color codes of the bins meant. Barriers to effective segregation included low publicity, insufficient bins, and low monitoring. Management should intensify publicity, introduce more bins, and diversify the system.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22985,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Scientific World Journal\",\"volume\":\"2025 \",\"pages\":\"6169623\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12227260/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Scientific World Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/tswj/6169623\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Environmental Science\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Scientific World Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/tswj/6169623","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2017年,夸梅·恩克鲁玛科技大学(KNUST)建立了一个废物分类系统,为塑料回收设施提供塑料废物,以改善固体废物管理。然而,自隔离制度建立以来,一直没有任何评估来确定其效率。因此,本研究旨在评估KNUST的废物分类系统的效率。本研究采用定量研究的方法来评估分离系统的效率。共有500名随机选择的参与者参与了这项调查,其中包括学生、讲师、管理人员、清洁工和其他工作人员。同时,为了确定分类系统的效率,通过分层随机抽样,选择67个垃圾箱对塑料垃圾进行分类。结果显示对隔离的态度差,依从性低,效果不佳。对校园垃圾成分的分析显示,64.7%的参与者产生了废纸,83.5%的人产生了塑料,82.5%的人产生了食物垃圾,28.2%的人产生了罐头。相应的,产生的纤维袋、玻璃和其他废弃物分别为9.4%、11.24%和4.4%。塑料废物流由聚对苯二甲酸乙二醇酯(PET)、高密度聚乙烯(HDPE)、低密度聚乙烯(LDPE)和聚苯乙烯(PS)组成。在参与者中,43.9%的人知道校园垃圾分类,75.5%的人见过垃圾桶。在参与者中,56.5%的人知道箱子颜色代码的含义。有效隔离的障碍包括宣传力度低、垃圾箱不足和监测力度低。管理部门应加大宣传力度,增加垃圾箱数量,使系统多样化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing the Efficiency of Bin-Centered Solid Waste Segregation System in Ashanti Region, Ghana.

Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology (KNUST) established a waste segregation system that provided plastic waste to feed a plastic recycling facility to improve solid waste management in 2017. However, since the establishment of the segregation system, there has not been any assessment to ascertain its efficiency. Hence, this research seeks to assess the efficiency of KNUST's waste segregation system. The study utilized a quantitative research approach method to assess the efficiency of the segregation system. A total of 500 randomly selected participants, including students, lecturers, administrators, cleaners, and other staff, participated in the survey. Also, to ascertain the efficiency of the segregation system, through stratified random sampling, 67 bins were selected for the segregation of plastic waste. The results indicated poor attitudes towards segregation, low adherence, and ineffectiveness. Analysis of the waste components generated on campus revealed that 64.7% of the participants generated paper as part of the total waste produced, a substantial 83.5% generated plastics, 82.5% generated food waste, and 28.2% generated tins/cans. A corresponding 9.4%, 11.24%, and 4.4% generated fiber bags, glass, and other waste types, respectively. The plastic waste stream consists of polyethylene terephthalate (PET), high-density polyethylene (HDPE), low-density polyethylene (LDPE), and polystyrene (PS). Of the participants, 43.9% knew about waste segregation on campus, and 75.5% had seen the bins. Of the participants, 56.5% knew what the color codes of the bins meant. Barriers to effective segregation included low publicity, insufficient bins, and low monitoring. Management should intensify publicity, introduce more bins, and diversify the system.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
The Scientific World Journal
The Scientific World Journal 综合性期刊-综合性期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
170
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: The Scientific World Journal is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research, reviews, and clinical studies covering a wide range of subjects in science, technology, and medicine. The journal is divided into 81 subject areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信